Literal peasants had it better than us. They had a large house, a virgin wife, a stable job. They worked 14 weeks a year and enjoyed 160-180 days holiday.

>>510076139 (OP)
Not every peasant was poor. There were rich peasants. Medieval social classes were not based on wealth, only correlated with wealth.

>>510076211
What's the difference between a rich peasant and a rich noble

>>510076265
Family history.

>>510076139 (OP)
>us
Don't lump me in with your retarded ass.

>>510076265
One gets to tell the other what to do.

>>510076139 (OP)
If things were so good, why did they immigrate to both Americas? Also a ship ticket cost as much as their salary for a year.

>>510076139 (OP)
That's a multigenerational home, so enjoy living in a Home Alone size household.

>>510076265
It is relative, do you mean rich peasant by oeasant standards and rich noble by noble standards? If yes than the noble is far richer. Though the richests peasants were far wealthier than the poorest of the nobles. Blood and title would be the main difference.

>>510076265
they don't own the land they farm

>>510076265
In 11th century (first crusade), it was the same. Rich peasant and vikings are the ancestor of european nobility.

>>510076139 (OP)
Retards will believe any shitty AI generated picture is real
Truly the lowest IQ board

>>510076265
political rights

>>510076303
because peasant wasn't the lowest class

>>510076265
A noble was expected to fight if there was a war.

>>510076509
What was below a peasant?

>>510076139 (OP)
It's only when you find out that there were 20 unwashed families living in that house.

>>510076607
20 WHITE unwashed families.

>>510076559
serfs

>>510076559
An American.

>>510076486
The only right answer.
Nobles had way more political rights while peasants had to organize into municipalities or tribes. I also imagine lots of rich commoners mixed with poor nobility to gain rights while those nobles were able to stay afloat financially.

>>510076354
Class has nothing at all to do with wealth, you literal mouthbreathing macaque.

>>510076265
Nobles theoretically had to fight in wars, peasants didn't. Europe went to shit and disintegrated when nobles started to avoid their responsibility on various bullshit pretexts.

>>510076139 (OP)
>stable job
not everyone worked with horses back then anon...

>>510076758
>Class has nothing at all to do with wealth, you literal mouthbreathing macaque.
You should work on your English literacy more.

>>510076139 (OP)
>Literal peasants had it better than us.
yes their cute virgin wife with 3 teeth and the hygiene of a raccoon, and their 5 cute children (plus the 4 dead ones that didnt make it out of toddler age), and chronic typhoid fever
>They had a large house
imagine the work required on this shanty pigsty. I guess in lelgium this is considered some kind of romantic palace with top quality structural integrity and zero upkeep
>a stable job
you mean literally?
> They worked 14 weeks a year and enjoyed 160-180 days holiday
yes after working the land and dying in a war, everything else was comfy. they often went to Málaga for 3 months in the winter to escape the freezing and took the kids to Peasant Disney twice a year

>>510076139 (OP)
https://youtu.be/thJgU9jkdU4

>>510076559
Slaves and serfs.

>>510076139 (OP)
They worked 14 weeks and had nothing out of this work because all they made was taken from them by the nobles.

>>510076818
Not an argument you disgusting and deflecting kike.

>>510076139 (OP)
I hate ignorant, sheltered retards like you, op. You know nothing of those times.

>>510076139 (OP)
>They had a large house, a virgin wife, a stable job. They worked 14 weeks a year and enjoyed 160-180 days holiday.
I manage all of that on 20 weeks a year and I don't have to live with 5 other families, a bunch of livestock in winter or die of pneumonia at 25.

If you think peasants had it better you should have spent more time talking to your great grandparents.

Doesn't matter where you're from in europe, or the world really, you are only a few generations removed from horrific fucking living standards and at best one generation away from experiencing them again.

>>510076858
>es their cute virgin wife with 3 teeth and the hygiene of a raccoon, and their 5 cute children (plus the 4 dead ones that didnt make it out of toddler age), and chronic typhoid fever
typical (((civilization))) lies
Dental health is at an all time low
Deseases are at an all time high

The only reason child mortality is low and age expectancy is high because all the people who arent fit for life are kept alive. General health of "functioning" people declined significantly.

>>510077021
My post
>Medieval social classes were not based on wealth
His post
>Class has nothing at all to do with wealth

You should learn how to read too, at least he isn't a native English speaker, retard.

>>510076758
Noblisse oblige, at least being nobles always guaranteed them a leading position. They didn't have to be common footsoldiers or lead charges personally unless it was out of their own volition. Minor nobles from the 1700-1800s or close are way more deserving of respect, those people had every noble responsability but absolutely no benefit, yet they still fought whenever called for. They weren't just protecting their property like feudal nobles.

>>510076818
My English is perfectly fine. Are *are* a literal mouthbreathing macaque.

>>510076758
That's a period of time when armies became very small and professional armies made up of nobles

Then they started 1-uping each other by increase sizes of armies again which meant everyone had to recruiting masses of peasants to fill armies

>>510077386
Your English isn't fine. You struggle to understand basic sentences, don't feel too bad though, there's an American having troubles as well.
>>510077358

>>510076303
most immigration happened after industrial revolution. After it, there were few peasants left.

>>510076303
we paid for the trips in full if they were european immigrants, I don't know about how it was in the north though. The first europeans who arrived here got a such a ginourmous amount of benefits you wouldn't believe.

>>510076139 (OP)
>dumb opinion

Life was constant toil back then, to think otherwise is retarded.

>>510076139 (OP)
still looks like this here

>>510076818
No he's right, wealth and class can correlate somewhat but they're too entirely different things, unless you're American where the concept of class only really exists in certain demographics.

>>510077618
In north America people were given huge areas of land just for turning up at the right time.

>>510076803
Have a (Ewe) for the peak dad joke.

Too much obsession over this, and not thd fact that boomers lived the pinnacle human experience in 95% white nations, all owned property within 3-5 years of work, and enjoyed limitless upwards financial mobility. Only to completely rugpull every subsequent generation, replace wealth with debt, invite infinity third worlders to fuel ponzi bubbles, and now steer the earth toward an irreversible trajectory to hell.

>>510076265
One financed the communists the other got hanged by the communists

>>510077763
That's exactly what I said in my post.

>>510076265
Read Evola.
Nobility is about the content of character, morality, sense of justice and above all in Indo European culture, bravery in war.
The way you'd get a nobility title as a peasant was by distinguishing yourself in battle.
Of course, over the centuries it degenerated, nobles became decadent and then richfags with shitty character wanted power so financed and orchestrated the french revolution which is basically the globohomo bourgeoisie seizing power from the old nobility, money taking over bravery/morality. That's when everything went to shit exponentially faster.
See, your question is itself a good indication of the time, people can't even conceive anymore something other than money being the token to power.

Also on the question of land ownership, Evola explains very well why it land should be considered sacred and not purchasable with money. It has to remain tied to nobility. Peasants can get "rich" but shouldn't own their land. The land belong to the guy who fought for it and can crush the skull of the next guy trying to take it.

>>510077917
Fair enough

>>510077782
We only gave that benefit out to germans, 75 hectares of free land per family for the first wave. They were subsidized silver by each colonist too, even isented from military service and taxation. Even this gigantic amount of benefits only got a few thousand of them to come.

>>510076139 (OP)
>>510076265
>what are Franklins?

>>510077782
In Quebec, we supplied men with free cunny as well. Look up les filles du roi

Can you imagine getting to Colorado first and just saying welp, this 1000 acres full of aspen groves, peaks, fresh streams, and alpine eden are mine now. And if some Indians get uppity about it, the government literally backs you up with the military.

Now you get a cuck shack on loan to (((banks))).

>>510077285
yeah no they all had beautiful, perfect teeth back then, and the personal hygiene, pfaw.... way better than now

>>510078337
Mankind is best used on the frontier. Now we stagnate until a new one opens.

>>510076139 (OP)
thankfully I'm not cucked enough to pay 60% of my income (if I got a job) just to be able to rent a shoebox in a building filled with niggers and spics in a lower cost neighborhood filled with niggers and spics and chinks and jeets and leftoids
no, I'll keep living with my parents, who unfortunately need a lot of help for how old they are, in a place where I have room for hobbies and there isn't three families of spics sharing an apartment above me or any other gay retarded bugbox shit

>>510078393
Meanwhile you have no family and your genetic line ends while all those minorities you disparage have above replacement rate levels of kids.

If you are going to bitch so much, go start a family and work a job. Or be surpassed by minorities who somehow have no problem reproducing despite it not being ‘comfortable’ enough for you.

this is closer to reality.
and there were 10 people living inside.

>>510078714
where you got this picture of my house from??? do you also have picture of my virgin wife you fucking hacker???

>>510076559
>>510076711
Welcome to /pol/ the school for 10 yo kids

>>510078714
The house in the op pic probably didn't have much more living space per person either.
Most was barn or stable area.

>>510076303
Because that guy with the house and land was the oldest son. He also had 5 brothers who owned nothing. German immigration to America was all such landless 2nd sons.

Germany is massively over populated. The 33 least populated U.S. states (excluding Alaska) equal Germany's population when all combined.
Germany is 20% of the E.U. population but only 7% of the land.

>>510076139 (OP)
even if they did not own the land used they still had it better, without the technology and machines we have today mind you
where is all this work going

>>510076265
Less than the difference between a modern peasant and a modern noble.

>people during the fucking FRENCH REVOLUTION had better wealth distribution than current day America

lol. lmao even.

>>510076139 (OP)
The main advantage of being in a bugman apartment is that you have access to running water, internet, electricity, heating. AC.

>>510080384
I have all that in my 400 square meter 6 bedroom 4 bath home on 2 hectares.

>>510076139 (OP)
>Literal peasants had it better than us.

but anon... they were mostly illiterate.

oh, wait, you are trying to convince the population to give up their rights and volunteer to live under a neo-feudal tech monarchy, aren't you?

>>510076559
the term peasant was degraded to divide individuals who integrated into the collectivist system and those who resisted it. psyops as old as time.

>>510080320
Every neighborhood was 100% nigger free and women were in their place.
You need to adjust for societal quality degradation

“Formerly Chuck’s” signals not just a name change, but the invisible violence of rural consolidation—Chuck is gone, his name reduced to a footnote. Sneed is the new landlord of legacy.

>>510078084
It's not fair

>>510080925
Middle Ages were known for relative egalitarianism and distribution of wealth and power. What came before and after is the era of oligarchs and self described god-kings building castles and palaces and skyscrapers and aircraft carriers. None of these benefit the common man.

>>510076265
Owning land

>>510076139 (OP)
my phone alone is worth more than every human, animal, object combined in 1890

>>510081711
>building castles and palaces and skyscrapers and aircraft carriers.

Castles were quite useful in warfare, and sieges.

Skyscrapers are the best way we have of shoving as much useful space onto a single small footprint as we can. it's good economically, if used correctly.

And do I even have to defend aircraft carriers?

Or was aircraft carriers the little lie you put in there to attempt to subtly introduce the idea of de-militarization to a nation you are planning to attack in the future?

>>510076139 (OP)
But I have my bread and circuses of a World of Warcraft addiction and endless goyslop to eat.

>>510076139 (OP)
You’re looking at what is also used as a barn. All the farm animals lived in the main house with the 7 person family. It may look large and comfy, but in reality the peasant hovel was a disgusting mess. No plumbing. Shit everywhere

>>510076607
Don’t forget all their farm animals

>>510077432
The longbow did it. All of a sudden the nobles were outplayed. All of Frankish aristocracy was killed at Agincourt

>>510076139 (OP)
That house is made of literal shit though.

>>510076265
Peasant could only rent Noble owned land. Noble also had responsibility to those under him and over him. Being a Noble basically meant you had a small pocket of government you were Lord of a domain unless you pissed off the king or enough of your peasants in which case you would have a revolt or the kings army would show up and raze the place. It was basically being a governor/manager with a mix of privilege and responsibility until the system degraded as all social systems/games do

>>510076750
>American derangement syndrome rears it's ugly head again.
Don't you have an aboriginal to suck off?

>>510082417
Could a peasant become a noble?

>>510080178
wise answer

>>510082417
>Peasant could only rent Noble owned land
depends on the era

Doubt you retards would glorify peasant life so much after having to clean the outhouse lmao. Doesnt take much to give a chud reality break

>>510076265
Peasants weren’t allowed to own land until ~1290 in England. After this they could own land. That’s pretty much the difference

1914 - The Netherlands.

>>510081813
There were peasants without feudal lords all over Europe throughout the whole middle ages.

>>510082961
Throwing away some poo poo ain't that bad you literal tranny fag

>>510076211
>>510076139 (OP)
Also you'd never be allowed to build a house like that now.

Most of the cost goes into complying with bullshit regulations and taxes.
That house also isn't plumbed for water, electric, HVAC, gas, or sewage.

>>510083201
It was pretty bad in the 19th and early 20th century, the industrial revolution changed a lot of things. A lot of poverty, which is often forgotten by people who complain about "our" colonial history. Only after the war did things improve dramatically for the average person.

Medieval times are not really comparable to this, different challenges for different people, some things were worse, some things were better.

>>510076139 (OP)
Rent is $1800 now. I wish I was laying $1600.

>>510082600
Yes, but wasn't super common unless you were just bros with someone above you and a position was needed to be filled

>>510083201
Never forget what they took from you.

>>510086030
I believe this is a meme. Most people here are successful white men raising young families.

>there were rich peasants
The jew trying to psyop you into being a serf to a lord again lmao. The jew wants to be that lord.

>>510081891
To who? A phone would be useless in 1890

>>510076139 (OP)
What a steaming pile of shit. They spent those 160-180 days working hard on their own land growing their own food.