Here you are arguing about minorities when they might not even exist in the way you think they do.

>>510080809 (OP)
No, but it confuses and angers the brainlet no end. Pretty funny really.

well regardless of whether or not there's a teapot floating in space that's not helpful thinking

>>510080809 (OP)
>cannot be disproven
Then it is an empty and invalid ideology because it is non-falsifiable. It's not even considered proper logic.

>>510080869
Your atheistic talking point highlights an ironic lack of scepticism ie scepticism about the nature of reality aka philosophy aka the science of metaphysics aka sometimes a biology professor can't even conceive of

>>510080944
Anything other than solipsism is an empty ideology as it doesn't address solipsism which is the only non ideological idea there is

>>510080944
my unkel has this fat buddha statue in gold

>>510080944
The thing though is that the worldview that most people choose to run with has just as little proof.

>>510081200
Sold gold? Is your uncle Tay Za?

>>510080809 (OP)
here's a good book

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5827/5827-h/5827-h.htm

>>510080809 (OP)
it can.
Why do you have no memories from the second you were born? Why did your consciousness not shown until 3-5 years or so?

Materialist answer: Because your brain hasn't developed yet to process and store long-term memories.
Idealist answer:???fuck you

Solipsism is satanic and evil, it is to deny the suffering of billions of people. It is a means to justify any crime or sin, any evil against any person. Buddha had compassion for living things, he did not deny their suffering by denying reality.

Freemasons promote gnostic solipsism and a satanic inversion of morality. Reality is no illusion. God is real and so is His creation. He also gives us a choice to sin or obey Him, meaning free will exists.

>>510080809 (OP)
>Solipsism can't be disproven
The space tea cup lives in my head rent free.

>>510083487
Not an argument. You, OP, and everyone else in this thread should study logic.

https://archive.org/details/logicorrightuseo00watt

>>510083487
>Solipsism is satanic and evil, it is to deny the suffering of billions of people. It is a means to justify any crime or sin, any evil against any person. Buddha had compassion for living things, he did not deny their suffering by denying reality.
>Freemasons promote gnostic solipsism and a satanic inversion of morality. Reality is no illusion. God is real and so is His creation. He also gives us a choice to sin or obey Him, meaning free will exists.

100% correct. The opposite, "We are all one we must return to Unity" is the shadow of this sentiment and is perhaps even more evil. We are separate but interconnected. God air gaps himself from extremists of either side, they are infected by Adharma.

>>510085061
study logic

>>510085163
Not an argument.

>>510085210
kek
swedecuck btfo

>>510085210
You're right, it's just a recommendation, seeing your total lack of arguments.

OP's proposition to be discussed is "solipsism can't be disproven". Both of you then start talking about the psychology of the person who chooses to cram either solipsism or some other belief into their head and just "believe" without proof. This has nothing to do with whether or not solipsism can be disproven or proven. It's ad hominem (psychologization), listen to this at the timestamp:

https://youtu.be/U3Jm8zF7bJ8?&t=2857

Then begin studying logic. I posted a few examples of materials here:

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/508076799

One of the first things you learn when you study logic, which is a very important thing to know, is the difference between a proposition and an argument, you both demonstrate not knowing the difference. Picrel is from https://archive.org/details/logicorrightuseo00watt but all logic books talk about this difference early on because it's absolutely fundamental. We learn zero logic in school these days, you have to study it on your own, which most people don't do.

>>510085794
Arguing is for worthless satanists like you who get high off conflict and discord. Touch grass.

>>510085892
What exactly are you attempting to do then, if not argue?

>>510086088
Why did you feel the need to insert yourself into my statement of facts to a fellow mystic?

>>510086453
Nobody cares about your "statements of facts" if you aren't backing them up, in other words propositions and not arguments. When you're posting statements/propositions you do it to persuade the reader, and mere propositions persuade nobody, unless they're coming from authority, and you're a nobody. Your ego response is due to not knowing logic, literally programmed to fight to defend the walls of your prison, as all the other NPCs on here. I gave advice, take it or leave it, I don't care.