>>510091925I'm not a biologist, so I won't make assertions to the categorization of what comprises as species, subspecies, relation, etc.
My point is rather that it doesnt even matter, you don't even have to go into that much detail, merely arguing from first principles like physics, game theory and incentive structures is perfectly adequate at explaining the obvious failings of liberal multiculturalism.
Blank slate theory is of course evidently flase, we have ample evidence that divergent behaviour between groups of humans is a causal relation between genetics, social and natural environment. I dont really care whether you want to call it human, hominid, homo, etc, what it means is the same.
>>510092672>Not if mother nature and the endless, unbending, uncompromising, unchanging cosmos has anything to do with. And they will get the final say on all you SCUM eventually.Correct. There is no such thing as FREE LUNCH in our reality. Energy cannot be destroyed or created, and the fundamental trajectory is entropic. Complexity only arises from local production of negentropy, at the cost of externalized entropy.
>to make something you gotta take somethingSimple as.
>>510092800>>510092736It hasn't escaped my notice that you selectively chose to ignore my point about game theory, the freeloader problem and defection incentives. Its fine, I'm not expecting a refutation, because I know there isn't one.
Given the slight chance that you're not just a just shill paid to shit up this board, all I'd ask of you is to consider how and why actual arguments several anons have laid out here are false (not "wrong" or "bad", just not true). You may learn something. The anonymity of this site brings the advantadge of being able to separate ego from assertion, after all.
You don't have to answer this, btw. Just keep an open mind.