>>510103064I would say that the totality of the evidence points to Oswald as the single shooter. This happens two ways... with evidence that points to him as the lone gunman; and the evidence which eliminates the possibility of it being someone else.
Most conspiracy theories rely on a vast network of involved parties; in going that way, they also have to be able to defend the mechanical events they are claiming.
A good example... there are several theories which involve JFK's corpse being manipulated after the shooting. So several theories all pass through this same claim. But what of this claim? How was the body switched? How was a body that was under the eyewitness of dozens right up until hit was put back on the plane changed soon enough to account for what they claim are modifications of the body? Some have claimed that while the press cameras were focused on the officials on one side of the plane, that the casket was switched out the door on the other side of the plane.
This theory went on for decades before someone finally pointed out that AF1 didn't HAVE a door on the other side. This shoots to shit any theory based on that claim; but it doesn't matter, because supporting the CT is m ore important than the facts, so they simply make up another fake claim to explain away their first mistake.
I'm saying that when you take a close look at every theory other than Oswald acting alone; they quickly break down by provable facts, or self-contradiction.
There are several more examples of this