Thread 510131367

>teach boys not to harass women!
Why can't we also teach girls to not be sluts?

>>510131367 (OP)
harassment violates the NAP. being a slut is one's own choice.

>>510131424
lol

>>510131367 (OP)
OP would be a slut if he had tits and vagine

>>510131367 (OP)
Fucking dirty dirty slut

>>510131424
She will be fine, she can put it on her dating profile and simps will message her about how its not a big deal and they actually like herpes

>>510131424
women with hepes gives me the "ick".

>>510131367 (OP)
Must have been some real giga Chad she really wanted to keep with her if she let him go raw

>>510131424
Lmfao

>>510131367 (OP)
SHE FUCKED A NIGGER.

HU = hook-up

That's a tranny?

>>510132617
>a woman is not a key
she didn't even understand the analogy...

>>510131367 (OP)

What education does life need from you when God's judgment is very clearly demonstrated? Through impure and salacious vessels such as the one who made that short

Didn't George Floyd and Trayvon Martin both harass women? Didn't Joe Biden, Kamala's husband and Bill Clinton harass women?

So is this femcel AGAINST George Floyd?

>>510131367 (OP)
Trade femanon here.

I 100% agree with you OP. While we're at it, men or should I say boys, who still with their parents or play video games, shouldn't be allowed to vote. Also, you men must make more than 6 figures a year.

>>510135815
Vote? LOLOL someone that actually thinks Voting does something in 2025?

See Orange County and Milwaukee County over 100% turnouts or the 2016 primaries where everyone in a precinct voted for Sanders to have Clinton win it LOLOL

>>510135815
Female that doesn't pay attention during Economics (I'm shocked)

Only 21% of men make 6 figures or more, being extremely generous lets say only half of those are married or in there 50s+ that means only 1 in 10 single below 50 men make six figures or more . . . hmmm isn't that chart about 10 women and 10 men with all the arrows going to one man coming to mind again LOL

>>510136273
That's because manchildren like you will inherently vote for gibs instead of running the country like you are supposed to. I'd rather Clinton win than Sanders. You're part of the woke right aren't you

>>510136863
So I guess only 21% of men should have the right to vote. A manchild like you would probably vote for some women nonsense like unemployment benefits

>>510136934
LOLOL "manchild" (you know who is losing the logic of argument when the namecalling starts to fly)

Again a Female that doesn't pay attention during Economics (still shocked, shocked I tell you)

Men are supposed to run the country? I think Lilly Ledbetter would like to kick you in your very overweight but, equal pay sista, equal responsibility for "running the country". Seems like some Rosie the Riverter has to get back to the salt mines! Unless of course you are all in favor of repealing the 1964 Civil Rights Act giving women workplace rights? (funny how a Manchild has such an extensive and broad knowlege of society and governance, seems like someone in this discussion is just making up names and facts)

>>510137033
So you are voting FOR men to say things like . . .

"Only 21% of women we chose can (fill in the blank)"

Interesting, remember no one is above the law in America, we are all equal in the law. Forever it is written, a woman wants men to chose the 21% who get to (fill in the blank), thanks sista, you have put back women's rights by 250 years!

>>510131367 (OP)
I have argued for a long time now that we should teach girls to say no. Most of the alleged rapes happen because women don’t speak up and tell the guy to stop.

>>510137254
I'm just telling it like it is. If we are going to denounce sluts then we should denounce weak manchild who play video games, live with their parents, or make less than $100,000. How can men talk about being trad and then turn on a game console and spend 6 hours playing video games with Doritos stained fingers. That is so disgusting

>>510137470
No because women are actually very motivated to work hard and improve whereas the lonely manchild will only make excuses to play vidya and goon

>>510131424
You dun fucked up. Just kys already, ducklips, before you spread it... which you undoubtedly will.

>>510131424
Oh no, the consequences of my actions

>>510131424
Why is she talking about telling her parents when she is clearly old enough to schedule and go to her own gyno appointment? Fucking dumb whore, your parents don't need to hear about how much of a whore you are.

>>510137254
Anon, that isn't even a woman, it's a shitposter havin a giggle.

>>510137583
You make a reasoned logical well thought point then you turn around and revert back to $100,000 salary men.

Again put down the Feminist books and pick up an Economics book.

Only 1 in 5 men make over $100,000 and more than half of those are either 50+ or married.

So you are only talking about less than 10% of men who qualify in the $100,000 category.

If somebody told you you have to be prettier than the top 8% of the female population that is an impossible standard, so most women (and most men) just give up.

If "losing" as how you say a "manchild" means working your tail off following all the rules and you come out in the top 8.1% just to be called names and not get love, then why the F* even try?

>>510138394
Yeah and to think she throws around "manchild" when I am too much of a gentleman to simply state TOGTFO. Such is life, the "good men" learn not to be so good after all I guess Leo Durocher was right (remember female Anon, you are supposed to know the Durocher reference without looking it up)

>>510138088
over half of our world can be explained simply by remembering:
Daddys Lil Princess (and I'm talking about 30 somethings and 20 somethings LOL)

>>510133864
She was a malding whore. No normal man wants to risk dating a walking Petri dish.

>>510138886
>She was a malding whore.
*is
>a walking Petri dish
you never know

>>510131367 (OP)
What is a slut in your opinion? And what is the male equivalent called?