Thread 510189535

Why is it illegal to look at women in london?

There is a difference between looking at someone for a second and staring at someone for a prolonged amount of time. Staring has always been considered rude.

>>510189535 (OP)
>Why is it illegal to look at women in london?

>>510189535 (OP)
I like that they put blue eyes but this law was probably made because of jeets lmao.

>>510189777
This desu

I get endless passive-aggressive bullshit from women that makes me want to gouge their eyes out, but if you're ataring openly at them in an obviously lustful way you deserve to be shamed for it...

>>510189777
Yes, but the Brits turned being rude into a criminal offense.

>>510189535 (OP)
Trust, it isn't white men causing this, but Indians and Muslims. We all know, they will never call this fact out

>>510189535 (OP)
The main target audience for these types of campaigns are non-whites, so the eyes should be brown.
The blue eyes are a not-so-subtle way of portraying whites as evil.

>the offensive letters are white with blue eyes
Jesus fucking christ they're just pissing in your faces at this point

>>510189777
Does this mean there is no act that is (legally) "worthy" of being stared at?

I'm splitting hairs here, but it always felt that these were directed at pasty white boys, who don't do that to begin with, creating an aire of hostility, because the shitskin just sees "staring" (and doesn't read the rest) and is none the wiser, so... what exactly was this supposed to achieve?

There was no point, basically, or it's a public relations/warning signal science failure.

The person who stares is not going to be put off by a polite sign as that, ladies and gentlemen, good evening.

>>510189535 (OP)
>Why is it illegal to look at women in london
Because we live in an oppressive patriarchy, anon

>>510189535 (OP)
Tailless women should be illegal.

call this number every time you see a shitskin in london then let them deal with it, doesn't matter if they were staring or not