>do something
>win

>do nothing
>win

I'm starting to think communism is superior to capitalism

>>510279146 (OP)
China is a nation socialist state with Chinese characteristics.

>>510279146 (OP)
China is a national socialist state with Chinese characteristics.

>>510279146 (OP)

>>510279146 (OP)
>do whatever
>fertility rate falls to 1.0

Implessive

>>510279146 (OP)
Why did he catch fire?

Communism is Socialism with Antinationalistic characteristics, since the original goal of any communist revolution is for a global communist system of absolute equality.
The Soviets and Chinese had their falling out over this. The Soviets wanted globohomo internationalism and a mutting of the races while China was more worried about staying a sovereign state under its own rule.

Nowadays China is hardly Communist anymore, it's more of a Socialist Uniparty system heavily promoting Nationalism. Socialism, Nationalism, strict assimilation of subcultures and minority ethnic groups, I wonder where I heard that before...

Does nothing. Gets deposed.

>>510279146 (OP)
If you had to live under commie wagie conditions, you'd be taking a shotgun to your head before the shift's over. Kys already.

>>510279146 (OP)

>>510279146 (OP)
I’m starting to think you’re a gay jew, OP

>>510279976
The Soviet-Chinese split in the mid-20th century wasn’t just about internationalism versus sovereignty. It stemmed from ideological, strategic, and geopolitical tensions. The Soviets, under Khrushchev, pushed a form of internationalism that prioritized Soviet leadership of the global communist movement, which Mao saw as imperialistic. China, under Mao, wasn’t purely nationalist in the modern sense but emphasized self-reliance and revolutionary purity, partly due to distrust of Soviet dominance and partly due to practical concerns about China’s development and security. The “global communist system” was a shared ideal, but both sides disagreed on how to get there and who should lead.
Your point about modern China is partially correct. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has shifted dramatically since Mao’s era. Post-Deng Xiaoping reforms introduced market mechanisms, making China’s economy more state-capitalist than strictly communist. The CCP maintains a socialist framework but pairs it with strong nationalist rhetoric and policies. This includes assimilating minorities (e.g., Uyghurs, Tibetans) through cultural and political dominance, often justified as national unity. The term “Socialist Uniparty system” fits in that the CCP tolerates no political competition, but nationalism, not just socialism, is a core pillar.

The comparison to historical regimes that combined socialism, nationalism, and assimilation (e.g., Nazi Germany’s “National Socialism”) is provocative but flawed. China’s system lacks the racial ideology or militaristic expansionism of fascism. Instead, it’s a pragmatic blend of authoritarian socialism and Han-centric nationalism, prioritizing stability and economic growth over ideological purity.

>>510279146 (OP)
the Chinese superman wins.
the USA blew trillions (to offshore bank accounts) to end up with four shitty car companies, a broken plane company, a broken computer chip industry, a broken movie industry, and a software industry hanging on by a thread that mostly depends on allies not using superior systems. And the GDP mostly comes from foreigners brain drained here.
Letting religious fucknut psychos run the country probably isn't a good idea in the face of international competition. The functionality of the USD won't hold forever.

>>510279146 (OP)
The more I read about Xi's early life I'm almost certain he hates communism and spent a lifetime working his way up just to slowly crush it and free his people from yhat yoke.