Thread 510301682

Can any form of genocide be justified?

>>510301682 (OP)
Yes, under fascism. Anything that is Other must be purged to sustain the ethnostate's health, which should be the end goal of any society that desires continual existence even to the stars.

The strong will do what they will, and the weak suffer what they must.

>>510301682 (OP)
look at india and try not to justify there a genocide

>>510301682 (OP)
When it's against a group of people as vile as the jews, yes.

>>510301682 (OP)
Genocide implies a certain race is executed.
What about pedophiles?

I mean we should probably take the opportunity to get rid of the tiny amounts of jews that are there now, and ban circumcision, and usury.... So yeah we gotta yeet those yids

>>510301682 (OP)
No, not even of jews.
But it is necessary.

>>510301682 (OP)
yes. genocide against kikes and niggers because it would better all of humanity

How about we sterilise the jews amd tale their money and ban the religion then?

>>510301682 (OP)
Yes.

Can't even watch a comedy roast without 90% of the unfunny fucks being heebs

Look at all of these chuds bringing up jews every time, their minds are so broken by us, sad!

>>510301682 (OP)
>Can any form of genocide be justified?
The Jews believe so, yes.

>>510302228
Tell everyone you rape children without telling anyone you rape children >>510300757

>>510301682 (OP)
>Can any form of genocide be justified?
When it's either you or them, make sure it's them.

>>510302896
What's this from, anyway?

>>510301682 (OP)
Justified to who?

>>510301682 (OP)
jews can justify anything they feel
like, and they'll use god as their scapegoat when they do it
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gujPXF1WLKI

>>510301682 (OP)
If there is an entire group that is detrimental to the development of your society and persistent and insidious enough that just kicking them out is not a long-term solution, then yes.
However if genocide is the chosen option then it must be fully committed to, not finishing the job completely is a greater crime than not starting at all.

>live in a village
>one foreign-born family with different customs move in
>does everything they can to kill everyone else in village
>no amount of jail time works
>no amount of negotians/bartering/reasoning works
>nope, they must kill everyone else in the village
>it is their culture
>exiling them will work, but now you potentially pass on the issue to another village
Killing another group who will stop at nothing to destroy you and your people is justified. I'm not concerned about morality or fairness at that point. What cannot feasibly be answered, however, is the ability to scale the village scenario upwards to an entire race of people. Many of (((them))) are secular and otherwise act like normal humans. If only there were some way to root out only the ones who adhere to the principles of the Talmud. I believe they must be eliminated, but will the world correct itself afterwards? Who can say?

>>510301682 (OP)

Ultima ratio where all other threat neutralization measures (implemented or projected) fail to achieve expectedly lasting results.

>>510302881
Shutup big nose with your mutilated dicklet

>>510305733
How do you determine if the individual is worth destroying? Who makes that call? What if only a small percentage of a certain race/group of people/etc are the ones who are detrimental to the development of your society and the majority of them are harmless? Not taking kikes' side here, but this is what I've been stuck on for some time.

bump, looking for discussion

>>510301682 (OP)
Yes, masturbation is natural and helps you to be way more calmer

>>510301682 (OP)
>justified
Of course it can.
All of the genocides which have happened have been justified.
Example. They tell you that you are being attacked and oppressed by a group. This group is your oppressors.
You are now justified in genociding your oppressors.
They tell you that Straight White Men are oppressing minorities. The minorities are now justified in genociding all the Straight White Men.
Many such cases throughout the 20th Century.

>>510307832
>How do you determine if the individual is worth destroying?
By looking at their actions? How is that even a question, if a group of fuckers is doing something that actively harms everyone else then they need to go. Same for outsiders who refuse to peacefully integrate into the host society and adopt it's norms and standards, they either have to be kicked out or exterminated before they spread.
>but who decides this
In a good civilization, it's leaders. In a shit one, all the people who aren't retards.
>what if a small percentage are detrimental
If the majority is silent then they are complicit or compromised, and thus must be removed as well. The only ones that could be spared are ones making every effort to point out what is happening and fight against it, and only if they're willing to take direct action.

>>510310849
>If the majority is silent then they are complicit or compromised
Implying they are aware of their leaders raping kids, then sure. But most Jews are unaware of this and are unaware of the core principles of the Talmud. I find it hard to fault the sheep for the actions of the shepherd.

>>510312046
If most kikes are so stupid or blind they have yet to notice who's running the show and making the world shit for everyone else, then they need to fucking go. This is especially true with a community as tightly-knit as the jewish community and when thousands of anonymous internet users have been connecting the dots for decades.

>>510312720
No, what I'm saying is most secular kikes are normal fucking people and aren't thinking about how their leaders run the world. You saying that if they are so stupid or blind they have yet to notice, then they deserve it is synonymous with the Luciferian Code. Freemasonry and Kikes both think this way. Watch your shit and be careful not to speak like the enemy, lest you become what you despise.

>>510301682 (OP)
Yes. Chinese, niggers, Indians and spices should all be killed

>>510312046
>Implying they are aware of their leaders raping kids, then sure. But most Jews are unaware of this
Bullshit. They're willfully blind, at best. More likely, half of them have suspicions based on insider knowledge non-jews don't even have. This isn't a "one bad apple" scenario.
>>510313261
>No, what I'm saying is most secular kikes are normal fucking people
Up until 10 years or so ago, they'd write op-ed pieces where they do the tongue-in-cheek stuff with headlines like "We Need to Acknowledge We Really Do Run Hollywood/Banks/Whatever"...
Not normal fucking people. They belong to a stone-age blood cult, they refuse assimilation, they all benefit from the insular support structure their society provides, and all not-so-secretly love their automatic refugee-citizenship in Israel if things get hinky anywhere else (even, quite often, if they deserve the trouble they've caused elsewhere... they can just run off and avoid extradition). While I can't discount the possibility of one or two jews out there actually having a human conscience and something approaching typical decency, I would actually feel pity for such a soul, being born into an inbred clan of Machiavellian sociopaths hellbent on world domination. They are the very basis of the caricatures of mad scientists, supervillains, psychotic tyrants, etc.

>>510301682 (OP)
Yes; killing or sterilizing all but the very tallest and the very shortest in the population, so that we may have a race of giants and a race of dwarves like Führer Tolkien promised us.

>>510301682 (OP)
Yeah the mandeeps are giving birth to 750k infants a day in India alone. The world shouldnt be forced to sustain something like that

>>510301682 (OP)
Yes, of course. Should be obvious.
It really depends on how you value human life. Are all humans inherently valuable? Then you can't justify genocide.
People that are evil or some other descriptor that's bad and removes their valuable status and you can apply that to large groups of people? Then yes you can genocide them morally.

>>510301682 (OP)
yes because justification is opinion based

>>510303313
If he wore a pride flag you wouldn’t give a shit if he raped kids

>>510301682 (OP)
Yes, a species that does nothing but damage to the earth should be wiped out
Would you let cockroaches invade your home and take it over? Or would you kill every last one of them?

>>510314919
The reason this is such a difficult subject for me is the anecdotal evidence I'll bring up. I personally have a friend/acquaintance that I play irl /tg/ shit with. He's a self-proclaimed Jew, but acts like a white guy, with the Jew thing coming up as a joke about as often as a joke about a fat person would come up. He acts like every other irl Jew I've met. The collectivist hivemind of Jewish thought that I read about online just doesn't seem to exist where I live. The whole "silence is complacence" thing Brazilanon mentioned and the entire race being guilty for what their leaders have done are hard concepts for me to grasp. There is no hatred in my heart for any collective, but only for those who knowingly seek the destruction of my people. Help me out here, anon.

the military is voluntary most ppl support the military so when they genocide and get genocided it's all assumed to be justified desu

Yes. But it doesn't matter what justification you use if you don't have the strength and will to back it up.
Likewise, condemning it has no effect if you do nothing to stop it.

>>510301682 (OP)
Things will never change until the intelligence agencies, military-industrial-complex lairs and defense contractor facilities are stormed and the glowniggers and parasites who work there are executed and the data they collect is leaked to the public so that the rest of these government assets, zogbots, mercenaries, glorified jannies and authority figures can be hunted down and exterminated.

If we're ever invaded by aliens or demons or whatever, I feel like their genocide would be okay, although unlikely.

>>510313261
What you claim would only be the case for jews from such diluted bloodlines and so detached from their origins and jewish culture that even other kikes would consider them outsiders, and there are simply not enough kikes in the world for these would be kike mutts to be a silent majority.
The kike community is way too close-knit and way too distinct from other cultures for the "silent majority of ignorant innocents" to apply to them.