>>510327135No, you rebranded it how you want it to be. You blurred legal lines between consensual sex work and actual human trafficking, then weaponized media and law enforcement to punish people for behaviors that don't conform to your worldview.
Prostitution and human trafficking are not synonymous. Human trafficking is coercion, force, fraud, control. Prostitution, when consensual, involves none of that. Lumping the two together is like calling every bartender an accessory to alcoholism. It's intellectually dishonest and deliberately punitive.
Headlines aren’t verdicts. You’re talking about sting operations where undercover cops pose as sex workers on Backpage or escort sites. The guys think they're hiring an adult. There's no victim. The "crime" is manufactured by law enforcement. Then, to up the drama, it’s slapped with the label “trafficking.”
It’s not about saving victims. It’s about optics, stats, and virtue signaling—law enforcement wants funding, politicians want reelection, and DA offices want convictions.
the goal isn’t justice. It’s public destruction. You admit it. You want men doxxed, shamed, fired, ostracized—not because they hurt anyone, but because you want to make an example. That's not law. That's mob rule with a badge.
If the goal is rehabilitation, why is the system built to eradicate people socially and economically? Why is it gleeful? You don’t want reform. You want suffering. So now you're saying if a woman chooses sex work, she's trafficking herself? This is a theological position, not a legal one. You're trying to erase agency from adult women because it offends your personal view of “purity.” You claim to be defending women, but you're actually infantilizing them.
If a woman chooses to sell her time and her body, that’s her choice. Don’t pretend she’s a victim just because you can’t handle the idea that she’s not bound by your church-approved moral script.