>>510328282>It is not murder to defend yourself from being murderedNotice your very specific terminology which can only be fulfilled in very deliberate circumstances meaning defense in that situation would almost never occur and exists purely as head cannon. It actually precludes the need for the use of force to occur in the first place since a rational actor could be dissuaded and likely was driven to commit the crime out of want and because such cases require an actor with willful intent and foresight, the ability to deescalate and avoid bloodshed exists.
If you are in reality instead of lalaland, self defense is 100% illegal in all 50 states and the would-be actions of the aggressor conversely would not have been considered first degree murder.
This means, brainlet, the only real life scenarios where people are actually killed involve upsetting a petulant low impulse control person that snaps and kills you because you didn't walk on eggshells, not your abstract caped crusader crime stopper fantasy.
Imagine if you will, you are at a bar. You're flirting with a girl and suddenly her boyfriend isn't happy. Then you tell him "go away cuck", and he proceeds to break your jaw and pulverize you. If you do nothing, and he kills you, he will receive a reduced charged claiming he was impassioned and did not know what he was doing on account of the alcohol and being emotionally upset by the insults. And if you end his life, you will be viewed by the courts as the instigator because in their eyes, you instigated it with "fighting words" (translation, you made a crybaby upset) and charged with first degree murder. Texas v. Miller proves there is no actual right to self defense.