>>510489492>They legally can't print the names of underaged prostitutes you realize this right?Yes they can. There are plenty of mechanisms to do so, and this is blowing up to a national security incident because you have high profile individuals (including those with security clearances from DoD/HSI/DoEnergy/DoJ/IC). There is national security implications that compromise has occurred. The Lolita Express has a tail number furnished by CIA which means that CIA was either compromised or involved, if not both. That justifies an NSC reviewed report, via congressional commission HSI and FBI into ALL USGOV owned documentation surrounding this person, to include all SAP/SPO related civilian and military intelligence documents.
>The client list is already knownNo. It is guessed not provided directly by government as an affirmative claim. We don't want our own opinions, we want adjudicated reports and for it to be public domain.
>there was 200+ lawsuits against Epstein and 2 Maxwell trials all of them public.Not all for one, and plenty were likely frivolous. It is not the citizenry's direct obligation. Rather, U.S.A. (as in, US Attorney) represents The People and is obligated to actually litigate all the criminal trials, and DoJ is obligated to hold hearing for indictment and if justified, try, for ALL the civil torts. This is NOT the layman's obligation to sift the shit, that's where the incompetence/coverup arguments come from, it's not our fucking job, but it IS our fucking problem, cause USGOV fucking owes us this, we literally pay for it.
Girls testified to everything they saw or who they fucked and you can read it anytime
In redacted manner such that you don't know many. Sure, we know Prince Andrew fucking Virgnia, we don't know who Bill Gates or Clinton fucked and how often and what their ages were nor when, as a start. Who did Alan Dersh his wits in?
also
>it's not redactedis contradicted by
>just their names.
