>>510493954
>211 Republicans
How
>the Majority Members who voted Nay
It was a shitty way to start a vote. Present a bill on this alone and let the whole House vote on it. Then it'll weed out congressmen like you want to, if you really do want to.
The obvious question that's also begged is, if democrats genuinely care about this, why didn't they try to pass something when they had the majority for several years? It's all the same shit.
>>510494004
There's nothing at all dictating that they have to do it this way. It's only done for malicious reasons. It was obviously not going to pass this way and it wouldn't really weed out congress members. They just decided it was time to score a PR win for democrats in the eyes of retards right now.