>>510551524>>he understands the separation of church and state>Show me where this exists in the Constitution. BTW, you can't because it doesn't.To start, it's in the first amendment. Go read the entire first amendment. Is it in there word for word? No, and I bet that because it isn't you'll rebuke it and say "NUH UH".
You seem very obsessed about his family and his wife's religion. Show me the catholic church doctrine where it says, specifically, that all who practice Hinduism are going to hell. Show me specifics that Hinduism is mentioned by name. You made the claim, you back it up.
As for his "lying" I'd wager that if you are so hard-core about God, then let him deal with Vance's "lies" and his family going to hell. Vance is keeping his religious life separate from his stateman's life and that's fine. Christ even said to do so when the pharisees tried to pilpul him into supporting Rome over God. Vance is doing what christ said to do: "render unto Caeser what is Caeser's, render unto God what is God's". In fact, he even expressed disappointment that the previous pope tried to leverage Vance's beliefs over him to try and allow open borders, which Vance rejected, DESPITE him being catholic and being told to do so by the supreme catholic authority. Vance so far has been the least disappointing in this administration and has kept himself very consistent.
The fact you're making a mountain out of a molehill tells me you're pretending to give a shit and want to be angry about something. He is very consistent with his Roman catholic beliefs and he's very consistent with his governance and keeping the two separate.
And just to head this off at the pass, you're making all these ascertations about catholic doctrine, but you have to show anything.
>inb4 cherry picked scripture that doesn't mean what you think it means. You are a huge, disingenuous, and probably Jewish, faggot.