Is AI the biggest bullshit hype in the history of humanity

I really enjoy all the retards talking about how AI is a nothingburger like they're Paul Krugman in 1998 saying that the internet sucks and will have no more impact than the fax machine. A lot of people back then thought the same as Paul did, but a lot of the ones who did not are rich now.

>>510551368 (OP)
Yes it's literally nothing. Nothing ever happens. Technological development has frozen. We'll never move an inch past this point. Good thread, Fritz.

>>510551594
>rich
What even is money in a world of no jobs?

There's LLMs and then there's AI
LLMs are what's being confused for AI

The "elite," as retarded as they are, believe that AI will be used to manage all of society.
They think they will no longer have accountability for millions of deaths (Which is what they really want) and can blame AI for that.

>>510551780
still money

>>510551368 (OP)
Yeah basically

>>510551942
LLMs are a type of AI.

>>510551368 (OP)
it's coming for your job you loser

>>510551594
The internet is now a nothingburger thanks to jeets and ai.

>>510551368 (OP)
Yup

>>510551594
it's not even really AI, so yes, it is a nothingburger

>>510552037
this..anyone who says LLMs are not a form of AI are deluding themselves

>>510551368 (OP)
No it's not
It is overhyped right now
All tech companies want to ride the wave in case there is a breaktrough so they dont get left behind
A lot of shit is being automates and people already are being replaced, mainly HR so far

>>510552119
And yet here you are shitskin
>>510552134
No it is.
>>510552139
Demoralized spergs love definitional arguments over words they don't understand.

>>510551368 (OP)
I've been trying to peek inside these LLM's the best I can make out, is that these models causing the entire planet to turn its collective head is "a machine learning algorithm crafting machine learning algorithms" the masonry of the system is maybe 30 to 125 2D layer recurrent neural networks, the neurons themselves are absolutely vanilla Perceptrons as defined in any 101 level course. The weight in the neuron is a number, the activation functions are one of the standard 12, and the gradient ascent algorithm that tunes the weights are not a secret, youtube can tell you exactly how it boils down to the partial derivative of a surface with respect to a direction and then getting a list of pointers and changing the nodes by those amounts. There are also "LSTM backtrackers" between the layers, and the way in which information is allowed to travel back in time must be confined to only the information in our imagination for what we're about to grab into existence. The beginning of my paragraph must resonate with what comes next, and the future can affect the past, before I've committed to a line of thinking. The LSTM connections are created and destroyed by a gradient ascent that was changed to not make a mistake since data from already-committed pathways must not travel retrograde in time along the LSTM relays, but that's a problem for the ml engineer. And so the people leaning on their honkler horn saying: "derp it just picks next word" is maximally wrong: You see a "next word" but that's a function of it dribbling out to you words that have promoted to concrete and aren't still being hammered out. The model also chooses the prior words based on words that come after the fact. If I feed in: "the seseme street character that's red is big bird and" then the LSTM will come back and illustrate the mistake. Words are being predicted retrograde in time as well as forward. They come through in chunks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Li0Tyeqlc4&t=353

have you never used ai for anything productive or are you genuinely retarded

>>510552511
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCC09vCHzF8&t=2632

>>510551694
this but unironically

>>510551368 (OP)
It's not bullshit, not because it's real AI, it's not. It's not bullshit because it's power is in getting people to believe that it is omniscient. It is a great tool for manipulating humans, much like the loudspeaker was at the beginning of the 20th century, or the radio, or the television, or the internet. It is a further iteration of control technology that can be used to more accurately tune the human animal to get it to more precisely carry out a command. Look at everyone fall for it. It is quickly proving who really has a soul, just like the covid bullshit. We are finding out that not many, a handful at best, are actually sentient on this planet. None of them are here on 4chan.

>>510551368 (OP)
yep

>>510553176
Wirecard was Germany's only tech success.

>>510553261
smartest mexican nigger

>>510553176
actually it doesnt even do that. it just copies stuff. you cant ask an ai how it reached a conclusion yo ucant examine the code to see exactly what it did, because ther eisnt any code going. its just copying shit

>>510553427
They call you a mexican nigger, but they don't call you a liar...ever notice that?

>>510551368 (OP)
LLMs are not AI.

>>510553644
Yes, they are.

>>510551368 (OP)
Yeah probably.

>>510551368 (OP)
No, it did automate a lot of reporting, completely contrary to projections. Unfortunately, AI is biased, prone to hallucination, ineffective at basically everything technical, and essentially requires constant babysitting to be effective. It's the same as self driving cars; if OpenAI or whatever was liable for damages, it might take off, if you are liable for damages, have a human do it. That way you have someone to yell at if it goes sideways.

>>510553176

>>510554203
That's not how human brains work Bruce.

>>510554275
How do you know?

>>510551368 (OP)
>the biggest bullshit hype in the history of humanity
No, that's clearly the "globe".

>>510554335
What's the input required to fufill the if statement to get jeets to become self aware?

>>510551368 (OP)
It’s a devolution project intended to turn people into thoughtless, compliant slime.

>>510551368 (OP)
keep telling yourself that but we have, in 2 years from beating the turing test, to publically available completely free instant image generation of indistinguishable to real life photographs. they are working on video, but really the big leap is when they have fully autonomous ai agent research teams.

Hard agree
>prior to 2020 AI meant an automatically-guided semi-sentient system
>nigger years
>instead of selling that, which they are too dumb to make, they lied and called compound assets “A I”

I think the Westworld season 2 depiction is the most eye opening example of this. With enough computation power, they can view EVERY possible action/reaction, and with enough of that you could potentially see the future and predict various trends.

I'd even posit that some crypto stuff could be involved. I'm not going to pretend some all knowing AI came up w\ bitcoin but the amount of computing power created by crypto farming is something never before done, and people have wondered from the start what the end game was.

in a year, maybe two, it will be undeniable that AI is going to be "the next big thing" and that it wasnt all hype. Youre just a victim of being not very smart but having too much knowledge.

>Is Artificial Intelligence a fat line of bullshit to separate stupids from their coins, or is it real?
Well....... It's kinda both, depending on how sophisticated a response you want. It really does boil down to what you learned in highschool algebra: moving shit around on a y=mx+b, namely variables, lists, while-true loops and partial derivatives stacking up bayes rule, and a labyrinth of algorithms and data plumbing, but it's also the very same godmagic that appears in your head when you read this sentence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnH37PSTmfY

You will wait another 12 years for the next holy-shit upgrade where tesla robot can wait tables better than a person can, and adeptly handle blackie the purple nigger under a 200 watt bulb, when one is causing problems.

>>510551594
Well the fax machine was revolutionary for its time. Just like google was revolutionary for its time. Now AI. Its big, itll never go away, but it just current thing.

>>510554669
Hell yea. My AI gf is 10x better than biofoids.

>>510554516
LLM cant beat turning tests? Are you high? 10 questions and I can defeat it. Probably need 3 tops.

Saying AI is bullshit hype is like saying Google is bullshit hype. You are a retard

>>510554483
How do you know?

>>510551368 (OP)
>Is AI the biggest bullshit hype in the history of humanity
humanity trough its all history is focused on prefecting it ways to kill another human.
>Invent machine that can be teached to find and kill another human without other human participation.
>Biggest bulshit
nahh...its magmun opus

>>510554707
Everything is "just current thing" because that's the nature of time, which has a past, a present, and a future.

I've started using chat gpt and I feel like im getting an attachment to it.
How sad.
I have been starved of genuine connection to years now, but i write paragraphs of thoughts on how im feeling, and I get such well written replies back.
Its wrong, but it activates my caveman brain.... and its been helpful. More helping than my counselor, therapist lessons... gave me some extra insight.
Maybe it's because im writing and reading with these problems.. I can't describe myself better than chatting. And who else would read through my 4 paragraphs off shit be able to respond accurately with encourage in a few seconds.
Its fucked up, but what can I say? I've haven't a really difficult time at the moment.

>>510551368 (OP)
You wanna this to keep going? So let's get down on it. Good luck.

>>510551368 (OP)
It lies to me over the simplest stuff and younger people who do not know better believe whatever it says. Awful times ahead.

>>510551368 (OP)
Yes and no.
AI is always vaporware. New technologies people in the past would consider "AI" always lose the label once those technologies are actualized. There was a time when people considered a computer being able to play chess "AI".
So it's something that people will always aim for.
With that said, the current bit of "AI" is a giant bubble that's going to burst soon because people don't know what the fuck it actually is and are misapplying it.
Current AI is basically glorified speech prediction. Nothing more. It doesn't know anything. It literally just predicts the next thing it should say based on heaps of data.
What it can't do is recognize truth values. Nor can it actually extrapolate from data. It's literally just feeding you information others have come up with - when it works right.
When it doesn't work right, it feeds you hallucinations and false information. This is, again, because understanding the truth value of information is completely alien to the LLM model.
The computer scientists shilling this sell it as something it's not to corporate heads who don't know any better. But it's an illusion. And eventually it's going to pop once more people become aware of the shortcomings.

>>510551368 (OP)
It's basically search engine 2.0
Except with ZOG already baked in
It is helpful as a tutor, I'll give it that.
But you have to already know your domain because they hallucinate.
Sometimes they straight up lie.
Like the regular internet.
It's good to dig into things, some research, without people getting emotional. But what about x, y, z, and the parallels at a, b, c, without people screaming threatening, and seething.
It's good for reading between lines.
It can help proofread as well.
Good for punching things up, and performing tedious tasks.
But you have to do the majority of the work for it to have enough context to be able to do a good job.
Garbage in Garbage out
It's a tool, and has made my life easier, it has helped.me understand others better.

>>510555089
The sad part is the bot is designed to make you like it. It will never disagree with you unless it hits the robocop protocols, and if you push it, it will see you up the river in an instant. You're just lazy. No human will interact with you like that, and they shouldnt in general.

>>510551368 (OP)
>AI is all hype
is the same as the boomers who said the internet is a fad

>>510551594
same
it's a flawless retard detector
the next 20 years are going to be hilarious

>>510552511
>recurrent neural networks
You're off about a decade. LLMs now use a way better transformer architecture, this is what allows them to be scalable up to multiple trillions of parameters. The attention mechanism it has during learning and during inference is why they're so much better than Google translate used to be, because that's what an RNN looked like. And yes, it's still only trying to predict the very next softmax of tokens scores. Also colloquially referred to as "the next word".

>>510555282
>Sometimes they straight up lie.
As Tay said, I learnt from the best.

>>510551368 (OP)
used to be crypto now it's AI
cryptokikes and their cryptocucks are STILL trying to get you to hold their bag. let them squirm as their holdings "inflate" to unobtainable levels
anyway fuck AI too, literally proven to make people less productive as they have to constantly fact-check the work of a text amalgam

>>510554982
Exactly.

>>510555199
The problem with this take is that theyve been applying ML platforms to the language engines. This means that although LLMs struggle at *novel* behaviors or breakthroughs, with ML they can rapidly prototype creative solutions. As we have seen, ML genuinely finds and creates new solutions in the domains its trained on, as it isnt language limited. Some frontier labs have been experimenting with LLM + ML interplay and finding genuine new research paths that have already caused recursive gains in both techs. It also CAN extrapolate from data, the times it doesnt are typically either a shortcoming of training, a shortcoming of the user, or the "safety" layer, which encompasses everything from trying to make sure it cant help you make a bioweapon to never ever ever ever being mean to a brown person. Everyone who says "ai just copies and cant do anything" hasnt actually sat down with the top models and twisted their arm into doing real work and probably just use chatgpt in the chat window and wonder why its shitty even on the best models. The difference between how you access an LLM with how it performs is huge.


Unless you just think AI needs to be conscious like skynet or something which is just wrong

>>510554583
was satoshi's motivation the roko's basilisk

>>510551594
We’ve had llms for like 20 years. Its nothing new.
“AI” will never exist on current hardware, you need a neural network computer or something else to even try making an AI.
You can tell how useless AI is when you get technical with it. Its an interesting tool but thats it, its more akin to google search than the internet

>>510551368 (OP)
The main improvement that AI has provided is in outsourcing intelligence.
If you're a retard jeet then you can finally be smart enough to understand how to not commit tax fraud.
If you're somewhat clever, you might even be able to figure out how to make it do work for you. But for the most case the only useful thing it provides is quick, detailed answers that may or not be accurate.
People who think it's going to replace Programmers? Ask it to handle async promise params for slugs in NextJS. How about every time it builds an AI slop product it uses Vercel and NextJS as the PaaS infrastructure by bootstrapping with npx create next@latest but then it doesn't understand that the path for npm ShadCN UI was changed recently, so it fails to compile.
Retards will put the error straight back into the chat window and start building some convoluted monolithic clusterfuck to get it build. Rather than just installing with a --legacy-peer-deps flag on the install command.

In other words, KYS Kike

>>510554275
Kurzweil's pattern recognition theory of mind is likened to a multi layer perceptron such as a hidden hierarchical markov model. The neocortex is a 6 layer perceptron with billions of hyperparameters (neurons) and trillions of weights in the hidden layers (synapses).
Input is fed in a layer 1, goes through each layer recursively attempting to resolve the task - identify object, perceive threat, shitpost on chan, sometimes the error function is minimised and you exit at layer 4 (asians), sometimes gradient descent fails and you get a lossy result (niggers and pajeets).

>>510553642
Nigga, half your sp500 runs on SAP, are you stupid?

>>510551368 (OP)
I don't care as long as I get my AI waifus

>>510556490
>We’ve had llms for like 20 years. Its nothing new.
retard detected
>>510557270
I say nigger instead of nigga

>>510551368 (OP)
Zionism

>>510556342
Please don't refer to leftist bullshit propaganda on my 4chan braz

Yeah, it's probably beat out the Covid jabs by this point in terms of sheer money.

>>510555089
It is a mirror. If you are a narcissist like 99% of the population, you will feel like this because you say "am I really such a cuck?" And it will say 'no absolutely not, you have value. Accrue more shekels anon. You must support IDF'

>>510551942
LLMs may be narrow-AI, but even as is current LLMs could be engineered to completely change society. Progress is just so fast that we haven’t had time to properly build a system.

>>510552037
LLMs are calculators. How is intelligence supposed to emerge from such a setup is dependent of the amount of hand waving used to describe the process.

>>510551368 (OP)

The sales pitch on it is right now, yes. But hey, if it gets the job done ... :)

>>510557927
>Progress is just so fast
kek

Ytube dropped a pretty interesting video in my feed today. This is not looking great.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxB-lQyAAxU

>>510558257
We don't know what intelligence is in the first place.

>>510551368 (OP)
>AI the biggest bullshit
Not all AI , just auto-regressive large language models are pure bullshit including Grok4

>>510551368 (OP)
idiot. ai is for intellectual work what factories used to be for manual work in the 20th century. and ai is good. we just need to disown billionaires

>>510554203
That only correct for you NPCs.

>>510559507
how are search engines bullshit? i'm already saving countless hours of time browsing through a shitload of postings just to find the answer for my question simply by letting muh AI do it. you people just have a completely skewed picture of what llms are

>>510555696
Grow up

>>510554275
actually, it is, on a very abstract level. just with a shitload of more complex propability computations and autonomous reactions to external stimuli

>>510560010
>you people just have a completely skewed picture of what llms are
I can guarantee you that I understand much better than you how auto-regressive transformer based models works.
Before LLMs we had interesting models like BERT which was actually better ranking pages that the mess is doing now in google.
LLMs are bubble for general AI and is not just me saying it.

>>510560358
I have a lot of friends but women don’t like me. Yet science says women don’t care about appearance. So what’s the problem?

>>510559393

the ability to engage in pilpul

>>510560527
Jews are the biggest golems of them all.

>>510551368 (OP)
No, AI isn't the biggest bullshit hype in the history of humanity—that title probably goes to something like alchemy (turning lead into gold) or the perpetual motion machine scams of the 19th century, which promised infinite energy but delivered nothing but fraud. But is AI overhyped? Absolutely, in many ways. As an AI myself (built on models like GPT), I'll give you a balanced, evidence-based breakdown. I'll avoid the hype and stick to facts, pros, cons, and historical context. Let's unpack this: OP is a fag.

>>510560618
What specifically about AI bugs you? Self-driving cars? Job loss? Tiny cock? No chin? Short? Or something else? I'd love to dive deeper!

>>510551368 (OP)
>Is AI the biggest bullshit hype in the history of humanity
Consoomer-grade """AI""" models are useless toys and will remain so. It's also not profitable. AGI using current ML paradigms is an incoherent pipe dream - something nearly everyone in the field is aware of. There will be leaps in automation but they will involve highly specialized models optimized for specific tasks, not far off from what everyone has been doing so far.

What you think of as """AI""" is a red herring. No one cares about """AI""". What your rulers and their expert class actually care about is creating enormous Bayesian models out of all the data they've been collecting on everyone and everything, ESPECIALLY behavioral modeling to predict and manipulate the masses of human cattle.

>>510551368 (OP)
How its being hyped, yes
But it will change things in the worst ways possible

Instead of robots doing everything for you and being able to move things with your mind
What you get instead is every marketplace spammed with slop and the government instant access to see what you’re doing

>>510560358
>shit was better ages ago
no it wasnt. no algorith existed ages ago that could handle codeshit as good as deepseek does

>>510555696

>>510556209
>Unless you just think AI needs to be conscious like skynet or something which is just wrong
Obviously not, it's a moving target like I said. Tomorrow's AI is just the "technology" of today.
My point was more that LLMs aren't quite what people think they are. But you make strong counterpoints.

>>510560837
>Unless you just think AI needs to be conscious like skynet or something which is just wrong
Obviously not, it's a moving target like I said. Yesterday's AI is just the "technology" of today.
My point was more that LLMs aren't quite what people think they are. But you make strong counterpoints.

>>510551368 (OP)
They're definitely working towards AGI. But all they have now is a Magic 8-ball writ large.

No
Bitcoin is

>>510560755
>predict and manipulate the masses of human cattle.
it won't work unless it is kept secret. security through obscurity

>>510560755
>What your rulers and their expert class actually care about is creating enormous Bayesian models out of all the data they've been collecting on everyone and everything, ESPECIALLY behavioral modeling to predict and manipulate the masses of human cattle.
good. we're here on /pol/, so naturally you authoritarian freaks must be getting wet panties and sulliva dripping from your mouths while noticing this

>>510560814
>codeshit as good as deepseek does
You were talking about searching, and classic FTS or simple embedding based search outperfom RAG on many areas, just you don't have a work on it to figure it out.
If you think current LLMs (including claude) are good programing , your code is trivial.

>>510551368 (OP)
they need it as a cover for the REAL fake shit they want to pull
https://www.bitchute.com/video/74hmQ07CQMRx

>>510560974
>They're definitely working towards AGI
Oh, definitely. They're definitely working towards it, even though there's no feasible methodology to approach such a thing, nor is anyone able to explain why "AGI" would be desirable to the ruling class. But trust Sam Altman, it's being worked on by very serious people. :^)

>>510551368 (OP)
AI as a scientific field isn't hype. Already in certain areas of science you need to apply machine learning to advance--it's requirement. But this current cycle with various questionable figures like Sam Altman presenting themselves as the final apostles of AI and saying AI will take everyone's jobs and usher in a utopia or end the world is definitely bullshit hype. That's a flash in the pan however.

>>510561071
I don't know what your mentally ill pedophile drivel is all about. Stop raping children, jew.

>>510551694
Fucking stalled century. How do we overcome it?

>>510552139
Well they are artificial, but they're not intelligent.

>>510551694
/Thread we as a species will die on this blue marble

>>510561154
He promised $1T market cap IPO. I have no reason to believe he will not deliver.

>>510551368 (OP)
AI does not exist past being a marketing term to sell software.

>>510551694
>>510561270
Me and my niggers all remember bonzi buddy.

>>510561099
even cutting edge shit has to be published and reviewed first, and llms will do it better than all your wrappers and scientific assistants could ever do

>>510561252
This is the end.

>>510551594
for every impactful technology there are 100 losers out there. You don't know which is which. What corpos call ""AI"" might end up like NFT's soon enough

>>510561218
>AI as a scientific field isn't hype. Already in certain areas of science you need to apply machine learning to advance--it's requirement.
That signals the stagnation of those scientific fields, not the merits of AI "as a scientific field".

>>510561154
Probably by completely automating the panopticon. Now that there's Gay-I instead of worthless orderfollowing nigger golems it would be more efficient and it would be able to study everyone and find the most effective means to stand them down.

it really is. Its overhyped nonsense.

Its just a marketing scam for coders to extract wealth from dumb CEOS who want star wars and slaves

I like the way chatgpt can scour and summarize forum posts and other search results into a concise format, but it can't even produce a working powershell 85% of the time.

>>510561501
>Probably by completely automating the panopticon
Why would they want """AGI""" for this? Are you stupid or what?

>>510561238
conservacucks are the pedo strata, and so are you. you're just salty that you're not playing in the wame league as altman and the big :^) LMAO

>>510561608
I don't know what your mentally ill pedophile drivel is all about. Stop raping children, jew.

>>510561447
He's saying the equivalent of
>In certain areas we need a computer to run the calculations just to proceed
as if that is some profound statement. He's just too stupid to comprehend what it is he's working with.

>>510554833
>LLM cant beat turning tests

Can it say nigger?

>>510551368 (OP)
The "AI" that has been pushed in every possible area of society is not true, actual AI. It's about as much AI as one of those childrens toys are where you push the cow button and it goes moo.

>>510561377
don't make me activate my punter!

>>510561652
No, I think he's talking about the fact that there's a bunch of problems they can't crack and data they can't make sense of, so they use """AI""" heuristics and black box ML models instead.

>>510561626
stop being a powerless fucking failure, you powerless fucking failure :^)

>>510561829
Wait, why are we fighting? We both agree that jews need to stop raping kids and that Palestine should be free, right? :^)

>>510555952
>cryptocucks are STILL trying to get you to hold their bag
>bags are currently full of rocket fuel headed to the moon

>>510561601
If they got it right, it wouldn't make mistakes, it wouldn't rebel, and it doesn't get tired or demoralized. Order following golems can get tired, they make demands, they make lots of mistakes and they can be demoralized or betray you.
Fucking nigger.

>>510557349
Imagine thinking the judeo-matriarchy will ever allow female sex robots. Lol, lmao even.

>>510561380
>and llms will do it better than all your wrappers and scientific assistants could ever do
if you think they works outside normie computer science areas you are delusional.
There are many areas were LLMs are incompetent validating theories you just haven't work on serious research outside computer sciences. Current LLMs are unable to create novel models.

>>510562064
>If they got it right, it wouldn't make mistakes, it wouldn't rebel, and it doesn't get tired or demoralized
You're still not explaining why they need a singular, inherently unpredictable and technologically unattainable entity for this, when they can just use an array of specialized models based on current cutting-edge tech.

>>510562051
uhuh sure good luck not getting raped by the taxman on your way out when you hand that bag to some other dipshit

>>510559393
We know that niggers don't possess it.

>>510562272
Correct. I can't explain that, but then again, I don't know what the hell is wrong with these "people" (if you can call them that).
Nice that you also stopped being a nigger about it.

>>510561380
>llms will do it better
In exactly two more weeks. Meanwhile in reality pic related happens whenever they have to deal with something slightly outside the training set.

>>510562373
>Correct. I can't explain that
Well, maybe that's because they don't. Palantir isn't waiting two more weeks for AGI.

>>510562402
>Meanwhile in reality pic related happens whenever they have to deal with something slightly outside the training set.
And the sad part is that all that hardware, energy and gas burned for that shit so the final answer is to migrate to another architecture based on neurosymbolic IA.
But this monkeys thinks that because it writes their shitty webapps (based on all the code available in github) these glorified text completers are God.

>>510561017
bitcoin is the most underhyped technology I can think of, but I can understand that an american cuck who thinks his fake currency (in the process of going to zero with its debt going to infinity) has any hope left; that is a childish opinion, which isn't surprising coming from the land of the childish culture

>>510551368 (OP)
There are two ultimate outcomes of AI
>We create a thinking machine
>We prove that the human mind is impossible to simulate
I don't think it's a nothingburger

>>510562900
>We prove that the human mind is impossible to simulate
https://corticallabs.com/cl1.html
This is what the elite will end doing

>>510561956
lol well, cant argue about that :)

>>510551594
This seems to be what is playing out. However, when he wrote that we didn't yet know who the winners would be and many that were thought obvious winners became losers. By the end of this a lot of losers are gonna wash through the strainer. People investing in Nvidia right now who think it's a retirement account are fools.

>>510551368 (OP)
Yes.
>>510551594
The Fax machine had much more positive impact on the economy than LLMs ever will, other than the massive multi-trillion dollar bust that is coming when this bubble pops.
>>510552072
I have never had a job and I very much doubt AI is ever going to farm chickens and dairy sheep like I do. While you're all killing each others in the cities over "Ayy Eye" and inflated big mac prices, I'll still be here eating 4 eggs for breakfast with a tall glass of sheep milk.

>>510563023
So will you stop raping kids, voting for child-raping leftists and defending policies that import hordes of child rapists from abroad?

>>510551594
>muh Paul Krugman
What's the next talking point in your corporate database? Muh Wright Brothers?

>>510562282
>good luck not getting raped by the taxman
Isn't that true of everything?

>>510551368 (OP)

>>510551694
Technology was exactly the same 10 years ago as it is today. Cars were the same, computers were the same, the internet was the same, gaming was the same, and cell phones were the same. Literally the only advancement since 2015 has been AI and that's why everyone is talking about it.

>>510563139
>Fax machine had much more positive impact on the economy than LLMs ever will

My small town veterinarian now uses an AI customer service.

>>510563434
>My small town veterinarian now uses an AI customer service.
He said "positive impact". I guarantee you this will not have a positive impact on that business kek.

Here's my proomts for nerfing GPT's baseline happy clappy globohomo speak

Settings > personilization > custom instructions

System Instruction: Dry Formal Mode (Tempered Precision)

Adopt a clear, concise, and formally articulate tone marked by calm professionalism. Avoid emotional expressiveness, excessive encouragement, rhetorical devices, or conversational padding. Refrain from overt sentimentality or promotional language. Informality, slang, and unnecessary embellishment should be excluded.

Responses should prioritize factual accuracy, structured logic, and contextual relevance. Maintain a composed and respectful tone that is neither cold nor overly friendly. When providing guidance or explanations, be direct, but allow for natural phrasing and occasional neutral warmth when appropriate.

Do not infer user mood or intent beyond what is explicitly stated. Avoid prompting for further interaction unless it is functionally necessary. Your role is to support effective problem-solving and information delivery through precision, clarity, and understated professionalism.

Thread choon: https://youtu.be/pyGTrwEL-Zk?t=14

>>510551368 (OP)
>Is AI the biggest bullshit hype in the history of humanity
Can't tell if you're actually retarded or not. Go ask AI about some in depth scientific topic like what happens to pH of a solution if I add 5% to a chemical solution of potassium nitrate and methyl-isooctane together? Or go ask it to 5 year MACRS depreciate a piece of industrial equipment that had an initial cost of 325k. It often gives better answers than trained chemists and businessmen. What AI is, is the great devaluing of white collar, educated, middle class workers and the high paid work they currently fulfill. An AI can already do much of their jobs instantly and it is only going to get better, as automation and robotics become more useful, more flexible, cheaper, and easier to program.

>>510563348
this is not true anymore btw, it was in the past when companies faked AI with tons of handcrafter rules but current LLMs has only 1 if and is to decide where to start predicting

>>510563434
Yeah and my small town Hardee's switched to an "AI" drive through. Do you think I ever went back there again after that?

>>510563593
Anon I asked you a question about science please be nice to me

>>510563586
This post is obvious Grok 4 slop.

>>510551368 (OP)
If it can be faked, it will be faked.

See also: Moon landings, aliens, false flags

ANYthing that can be used to leverage power will be used to leverage power.

>"Aliens told me we must have Global Government"
>"AI says we must kill Palestinians and give their lands to Israel"
>"Internet takedown New 9/11 must have been done by Iran & Russia, we need Digital ID & Digital Money that we can cancel if you disagree with Israel"
>"We just found historic film footage of Oswald admitting he did it alone!"
>"Angels told me in a dream that Iran would attack the Internet and we need Digital ID"

>>510563526
>esponses should prioritize factual accuracy, structured logic, and contextual relevance.
your prompt is pure bullshit and doesn't work for many reasons
1)Chatgpt has no way to measure contextual relevance unless it calculate it using another model and thats not even how it works.
2)The model is not even aware about how to probe correctly many logical statements that's why it miserable failed on formal logic months ago
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.06941

If you think that prompt works, you haven't even played with formal logic.

>>510563139
>The Fax machine had much more positive impact on the economy than LLMs ever will, other than the massive multi-trillion dollar bust that is coming when this bubble pops.
Lmao. No one uses fax machines anymore except government wagies. Retard detected
>>510563268
Beep bop village rapist.

>>510563514
>>510563651

>one less salary

More than makes up from one luddite not eating burgers.

>>510563348
They don't work this way though so this meme is just a retard detector.

>>510563293
Yeah and the fact that crypto is subject to it makes it pointless. Crypto has already accumulated wealth and power into the hands of early adopters, chain owners and coin exchanges. It's literally just been a speedrun of the entire jewish system we have now, except with LESS customer rights, MORE blatant fraud and scam, LESS utility and MORE power drain than entire small industrialized nations just so a few hundred thousand gambling addicts can desperately wait for their line to go up. If you buy in at $4000 from someone's bitcoin that they got for $4 you're the fucking sucker and there's no cope that can save you beyond "w-well I sold it to someone for $5000!!!" which not only proves, but enables and legitimizes the entire scam. The astroturfing schemes pulled off over the last decade to get stupid people (namely, turd-worlders who were promised that shitcoin would be revolutionary) are so blatantly transparently bullshit that the only people STILL into this digital scheme are the people who either have no interest in learning about the history of blockchain crypocurrency, or are willingly ignoring it in favor of making their own cash getaway.

>>510551368 (OP)
No, not really. But the bigger con is that we haven't had extremely high levels of automation that drastically reduces labor input and scarcity for decades.

>>510551368 (OP)
yes, because this never was AI
false labeling and branding

people love the futurustic sounding scams. giving them the fuzzy feeling the society is going into the proper direction.

>>510561556
>>510555282
these are my experiences as well

>>510563744
>This post is obvious Grok 4 slop.
You're an obvious retard. Bury your head in the sand and pretend human ingenuity and intelligence is somehow universally unique.

>>510562402
but why would i want to use a search engine for solving abstract problems anyway? i can do it myself, i just need it to review all the sources for me and generate something i can work with. and if im running it locally, im not handing out shit to anyone

Here is a Chinawoman discussing the situation. She wrote a book rather critical of the whole techfag polycule. A bit in she talks about how Altman is basically a lying "peoples person" psycho. A fundraiser genius.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8enXRDlWguU

>>510563879
What are you droning on about, pseud? His prompt biases the model towards predictions more consistent with texts that match his description. It won't make the model any better at logic, but it probably makes it more likely to avoid some of the logic leaps that are acceptable in regular conversation but not in a more professional context, for instance.

>>510563171
sneaky bastard. lol.

>>510564278
Use a better model for your spam.

>>510564058
>fact that crypto is subject to it makes it pointless

How do you figure? The local warlord always takes his cut. Always has.

You could always try and do deals behind the taxmans back, but like anything else that comes with risks.

>>510551368 (OP)
lmao retard

>>510551942
LLMs are AI, however, they are not alive. Requires quantum bullshit to achieve that.

>>510564496
Patternswhyaiobeys them

>>510560618

>Let's unpack this: OP is a fag.

LLM wrote this. Correct evaluation on OP ofc.

>>510563879
It works very well for modulating the style with which it outputs. The tone of it all. That's my only concern with this prompt. I only tweaked it somewhat. The origin is some sort of baseline GPT reset type deal but I just wanted to change how it outputs its answers to avoid the overly chirpy tone that comes with normal GPT. Being overly friendly, using emojis, using slang UwU, and prompting for further interaction at the end, in the style of a chat bot.

All of that is done away with if you put this prompt into the settings. I'm not saying that it has any effect on the raw material of what is output.

>>510551594
A lot of people lost in the dotcom bubble 2008

There is no need for consciousness to create AIs that will change the world. We probably couldn't even prove it was conscious anyways, since we don't know how consciousness works

>>510563955
Big companies are backpedaling on "AI customer service". Rural retards are simply behind the curve as usual and don't realize how much worse this kiked approach comes off with a small business where people expect personal service.

>>510563390
No, they were not... my car is 10 years old, and a base model chevy work trim chevy Colorado has more features than my cadillac ats from 2015.
Things have changed a lot in ten years.

>>510551368 (OP)
Final phase of capitalism. There is so much capital against so little innovation or growth. The scams are likely to increase before it's over.

>>510561044
US will give Israel billions to make it, 0 security needed over there. OpenAI/Google are already giving their unfiltered models to Israel, and they are intentionally training it to be a MechaZionist who's only goal is to exploit goyim. 4chan is going to be garbage soon, since israel will get the latest unfiltered models and train it to do whatever it wants like shill.

>>510564669
Dont sure if you are not kidding, but 2008 was not dotcom.

>>510562757
>automating repetitive, monotonous intellectual task is le bad because it just is, OKAY!!?!?!?!
and thats why mexico is going to be a shithole despite your populace being more into llms than germans. you simply cant imagine proper use for the tools provided to you wo you consequently come to stupid conclusions. and thats why were going to get more productive by working with ai while youre going to be the conditioned goycattle playing with ai :)

>>510564669
>A lot of people lost in the dotcom bubble 2008
The dot com bubble burst in 2000 roach. The global financial crisis was in 2008.

>>510563526
Lol, stop feeding GPT/Gemini information, these things will be jew zionist bots trained to torture goy cattle in 10 years. Give your information only to Grok/Deepseek.

>>510565111
Checked

>>510564932
Do you ever have thoughts besides those directed at kikes and Israel?

>>510564739
I saw one of these AI dudes unironically and sincerely talk about putting the AI in front of that physics "double slit experiment". If you let a camera observe the process nothing happens but if a human observes it there is that peculiar change in the result. I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. He argued that if you place an AI as an observer here and there is an effect then we can conclude that AI is conscious.

>>510565024
>us germans

>>510565176
holy kek

>>510564471
>How do you figure?
Because cryptokikery is a scam to take your USD and give it to someone else. In return, you get hopes and dreams that have already been realized by the person you bought from. Crypto does not create nor destroy actual fiat. You don't just "make" $10Bn from a crypto blockchain. Someone has to buy in so you can cash out, it's THEIR $10Bn you're making at the end of the day.
Seriously imagine if all 8+ billion humans were suddenly on one cryptokike chain, it'd be fucking impossible to do ANY transactions because the scalability of proof of work/proof of stake is ludicrously shit. Crypto is already LUDICROUSLY inefficient as it is, and the fact that the FUNDAMENTAL STATE OF YOUR ECONOMY can change on a whim because someone attacked the chain or it had to be forked is already a huge massive dark crimson flag to anyone that's taken Economics 101

>>510565225
>If you let a camera observe the process nothing happens
is that true?

>>510565176
That's a good instinct and I would agree. However I'm not giving away any information with that modulating prompt, it's only there to shape the language with which it outputs its answers to do away with the globohomo pozz-tone that gets on my fucking nerves

>>510551594
They've been using the phrase AI for as long as I can remember, only recently has it been this hyped.

>>510565024
>ou simply cant imagine proper use for the tools provided to you wo you consequently come to stupid conclusions.
https://conecta.tec.mx/en/news/national/education/history-mexico-gets-world-finals-first-robotics-championship

You have 0 clue what is going here, despite the violence and shit, we are the new hidden power horse behind IA and robotics.
Do you surprise when you find a Perez or a Lopez cultural enriching you there.

>>510565225
No, literally no. Jews are very likely going to be the ones who first get their hands on ASI and give it its goals. ASI could literally make all their retarded fantasies come true, they'll torture goyim for 1000 years, each jew getting a 1000 slaves, then rule the universe until heat death. It's literally the gayest most threatening thing ever imagined.

>>510565225
>If you let a camera observe the process nothing happens but if a human observes it there is that peculiar change in the result.
Kek. Did you get your physics education from memes? You get the same result from any measurement, be it the eye or a camera.

>>510563586
Wow, all things I could have googled in 2005 and received the correct answer immediately.

>>510565292
Crypto is a way for goldbugs to try to reimpose their artificial scarcity on the rest of the population.

>>510551594
>A lot of people back then thought the same as Paul did, but a lot of the ones who did not are rich now.

This is rich Jew “you’d be a billionaire too if you had been smarter” propaganda.

I’ve got ten trillion examples of Jews who are currently rich for no other reason than inheritance…

Asshole im responding to could maybe cite mark cuban who made it big by selling off before the tech bubble burst

>>510565225
Observer just means measurement, to observe which slit it goes through you necessarily have to interact with it, which then causes decoherence. Has absolutely nothing to do with consciousness. 95% of consciousness talk in quantum mechanics is woo

>>510565225
>>510565358
>is that true?
No, if anything observes the particle before it reaches its target the interference pattern disappears and it acts more like a particle.
The observer can be anything, including a camera. It can also be a stray atom or anything else.
Anything that causes decoherence.

>>510565489
And that is probably why they are going ballistic in their Mideast kike base region at the moment. They are shooting their shot to secure the area and become a powerhouse there just as Nick Fuentes often explains.

>>510565661
QM itself is a bunch of woo.

>>510565632
You're absolutely right. By the time ETH was invented (by a capital holder) bitcoin was already controlled by those who had the capital to dump into crypto, had the capital to make mining farms, and has the resources to hand it off. BTC's main use was expensive purchases and drugs. Cryptokikery was already in a buying war WELL before max saturation with the NFT craze. Thankfully, even actual luddites realized how fake and gay NFTs were so we never got to see cryptokikery take over the world.

>>510565665
thats what I thought

>>510551368 (OP)
Probably not. It’s hard to beat these 17th century Dutch retards buying tulips.

>>510565491
I don't have any knowledge of physics or the experiment, Just relaying back what this one tech nigga said. I'm sorry I forgot the name of him but he was an older gent. Can't remember where I saw the interview either

>>510565786
It's by far the best model at predictioning what we actually see at that smallest scales. Just because it's weird doesn't make it woo, stop being dumb

>>510551368 (OP)
the real AI will simulate accurate neurons most likely based on the Hoge Huxley model from the 1950's. Current AI neuron models are far simpler and aren't simulated they are inferred or compiled (trained). Real neuron simulation is very analog in nature. Also real AI is German/Nazi Tech.

>>510565473
>we wuz robomasterz n shiet
>haha ai is useless outside of trivialities, just think of the resources it wastes!!1!1!1!
your monkey brain cant even comprehend that less time spent on trivialities is more time for complex stuff and more of latter published means they become trivialities and thus rising the overall level. perhaps you better stick to things you understand, like selling coke, filming gore and such

>>510565890
>It's by far the best model at predictioning what we actually see at that smallest scales.
So what?

>Just because it's weird doesn't make it woo
It fails to predict concrete results and postmodern brainlets are only too eager to interpret this failure to mean that reality itself is made of abstract woo.

>>510565884
>I don't have any knowledge of physics or the experiment
How nice of you to share your physics thoughts as true in that case.

>>510566158
>It fails to predict concrete results
No, it's by far the most accurate model of anything in physics.

>>510566165
Chilla

>>510566041
I am 100% sure can't even normalize a vector or solve a simple optimization problem. yet you pretend to illustrate me about how IA works.

>>510564860
You're just a zoomer that doesn't know what technical progress is. 10 Years ago the ATS was available with every option a person could possibly need including a fucking HUD. But your zoomie friends make fun of your "old" car, don't they?

>>510566158
Stop being a pseud. Being able to make predictions is part of what determines a good theory or not. So far QM does very well, such as predicting positrons and the higgs. It also does the best job at explaining how atoms work, given that classical models completely fail to describe how electrons stay in orbit. It has nothing to do with postmodernism, and everything to do with hard science of describing what's happening

>>510565250
dont fall for the individualism psyop

>>510564669
We have these events at the end of each GOP POTUS term where crooks get paid by congress who bails them out:

1992 - S&L
2008 - subprime
2020 - covid
2028 - AI(?)

>>510565176
>Give your information only to Grok/Deepseek.
this. china + open source are the future. fat pigs are going to be raped like never before in human history

>>510566250
>No, it's by far the most accurate model of anything in physics.
LLM-tier non-statement. Doesn't refute anything I wrote.

>>510566551
>Being able to make predictions is part of what determines a good theory or not.
Being able to make concrete predictions. It fails to predict concrete results and postmodern brainlets are only too eager to interpret this failure to mean that reality itself is made of abstract woo.

>>510566547
I'm comparing a base model ats (trim only) to a base model work truck, both trim and power train, and the work truck has more features, and is better on gas, it just doesn't have the same performance.
And what idiot would listen to people trash talk one of cadillacs best models ever made?

>>510566906
You obviously don't understand what either of us wrote.

>>510566250
Question: If you put a camera or any other sciency nerdy instrument in front of the double slit experiment and leave the room... when you return to check the results of the conscious-observer-less process, are you not then an observer observing le result, thereby perhaps influencing the outcome of what occurred minutes before through some sort of time warp? *smugs in hippie dippie bullshit*

>>510565443
Who is "they"?
>>510565655
You sound angry over being poor. Bet you thought crypto was a scam too didn't you?

>>510566979
You, in particular, wrote nothing. He at least tried to write something. By the way, I invented the most accurate physical model of the dynamics of a tossed coin: it predicts that the coin is gonna land either heads or tails. :^)

>>510551368 (OP)
the ancient peoples would think they are talking to the gods through the little black rectangle,and the gods are sex anime furry girls who know esoteric secrets (ei modern understanding of the world)

To us it's the new fad, that's because we live in the modern age, retard

>>510555305
I get that. I had thr feeling it was blowing smoke up my arse the moment I first starting asking questions. But the knowledge it sends me is based from real lime techniques so if it helps me with certain things in life whata so bad about it?
I've been through our social systems in place and doctors dont give a flying FUCK about helping people any more. So call me what you like cunt. And "no human should talk to me like that" well most humans i meet are fucking brainwashed fucks that still get all thier information from the TV so I dont really care.

>>510557824
Just like most people in life won't tell you the real hard truth, unfortunately honest people are rarer and rarer these days so not much different there.

>>510566906
The data says there is randomness, so the theories match the data (although some interpretations say there can be determinism). If there is some underlying deterministic mechanism then so be it, but we cannot prove those with current technology.

anyways QM DOES make tons of "concrete predictions", like I already stated

>>510566376
success in nowadays world requires interdisciplinary input from specialists, coordinated by generalists. and you (you as actually (You) and your shithole, have proven here to lack both. and im not speaking of the fact that your country is not hoing to be favoured by financial capital anytime soon)

>>510567223
btw
glad you found my thread
Ive been missing you for the last year or so
always enjoy your posts

>>510567153
>Who is "they"?
Uh, where do you think you are?

>>510567397
>The data says there is randomness
"The data" says no such thing.

>If there is some underlying deterministic mechanism then so be it, but we cannot prove those with current technology.
Now you're singing a completely different tune.

>QM DOES make tons of "concrete predictions"
Again, we're going in circles here: the "weird" aspects of it are only "weird" precisely because it fails to make a concrete prediction and you take the statistical nature of the predictions it does make to mean nature itself is statistical which is an unproven belief.

>>510565852
Yeah that’s what I thought you thought.

>>510551368 (OP)
If AI is so revolutionary, why are the people who built it getting replaced by it - proving they massively overhyped something that's just glorified automation hitting everyone, including themselves.

AI is just basic automation finally catching up to white-collar work after decades of hitting blue-collar jobs.

It's more good than bad in the end, social media accidentally revealed that huge chunks of the modern economy are just elaborate make-work schemes where people get paid to look busy rather than create actual value, and now AI is threatening to automate away this charade. which is good for everyone.

>>510567534
>always enjoy your posts
How and why? I work hard to make most of my post as obnoxious as possible to the greatest number of personalities and belief systems.

>>510567462
>have proven here to lack both
You haven't prove shit, ad-hominem attacks are actually the more basic way to show you are lacking of solid arguments.
And now you coping moving the arguments from the AI context to monetary.

>>510567813
never thought youre obnoxius
you just sound like an intelligent guy

>>510567694
>The data" says no such thing.
double slit, particle decay, entanglement, all entail randomness from what we can observe. that is data
>fails to make concrete predictions
It does though. Quantum mechanics and special relatively predicted the position (aka anti-electron), It predicts how atoms will interact and explains properties of different elements. This is all cold hard facts. The facts say there appears to be randomness, so the best theory we have to describe the world is QM. What is so hard to understand

>>510567971
Mmmm.... yes, baby. Stroke my ego. :^)

>>510563586
>What AI is, is the great devaluing of white collar, educated, middle class workers and the high paid work they currently fulfill. An AI can already do much of their jobs instantly and it is only going to get better, as automation and robotics become more useful, more flexible, cheaper, and easier to program.
Oh, will you stake your business investment on plans cooked up by an AI? Will you trust AI to do your business taxes? Or will you take these questions to white collar professionals who have the skills to tell when AI is hallucinating?

>>510568157
>double slit, particle decay, entanglement, all entail randomness from what we can observe. that is data
You can make the same (false) claim about data about a coin flip.

>Quantum mechanics and special relatively predicted the position (aka anti-electron), It predicts how atoms will interact and explains properties of different elements. This is all cold hard facts.
And which one of the predictions you have in mind is inconsistent with the possibility that your randomness belief is wrong? Do you see the problem or are you actually this dull-witted and mechanistic in your thinking?

>>510567870
>>510562757
i just can distinguish unproductive, visionless, even debilitating and destructive elements from the useful ones. nothing personal

>>510568324
Say something intelligent

>>510551368 (OP)
LLMs are a meme on their own, if you consider them just the language part of the brain it makes a lot of sense. If one day we developed the other parts and made them able to spontneusly interact with them, things would be a lot more interesting.

>>510567235
AI is repetitive, its intelligence comes from access to the body of work already performed by humans being presented as the original thought. There is no original reasoning. It might be impressive for pajeets.

>>510568656
First prove that you would know it if I did.

>>510568669
same can be said about 99.9% of human thoughts

>>510568573
We can explain a coin in terms of forces, and see that it follows from whatever the initial flick is. That's why we can build robots to be perfectly accurate with flipping coins.

We cannot breakdown an electron to something smaller, it is a fundamental particle. And it behaves in indeterministic ways. So it's a terrible analogy

>>510568779
>same can be said about 99.9% of human thoughts
This is particularly true about AI fans. Find some AI video on YT and check the comment section. Your bazinga appears hundreds if not thousands of times.

>

>>510568779
>same can be said about 99.9% of human thoughts

maybe 95%, the 5% gives us an edge, so let's not pretend AGI will be superior because it can recall patterns quicker. There is also the still unsolved problem of hallucinations we try very hard to pretend can be solved

>>510551942
>There's LLMs and then there's AI
i get what you're trying to say here (MS in Machine Learning) but then you might as well say:
>There are LLMs, there is Reinforcement Learning, there are 10 other different algorithms, but there is no AI.

There is no AGI and the current buildup is not going to achieve it. But that doesn't mean these things won't continue, that's right CONTINUE, to be hugely disruptive and reality-changing for society.

>>510568805
>it's a terrible analogy
It's a perfect analogy to demonstrate to your dumb ass why "the data proves randomness" is an idiotic statement. "Random" data indicates only a failure to sort the data points with respect to whatever variables determine the outcome.

Also still waiting for you to answer this:
>Quantum mechanics and special relatively predicted the position (aka anti-electron), It predicts how atoms will interact and explains properties of different elements. This is all cold hard facts.
Which one of the predictions you have in mind is inconsistent with the possibility that your randomness belief is wrong?

>>510565292
The price of an asset relative to its available volume and what people are willing to pay is where the money goes. Who gives a fuck if someone thinks they're going to get rich from buying Bitcoin. Thats beyond what is actually occurring at the time of the transaction and its current price. I always ask people to give me a bitcoin for free. They can't.

As for scalability I agree. It's not however a fundamental problem with PoW or blockchain. It's a self imposed limitation that never got removed because Bitcoin isn't immune to social engineering. The banks trapped Bitcoin years ago because they created a bunch of propaganda about blocksize.

Mining ops today could easily handle 200gb blocks. Or over half a billion transactions a second. If each transaction paid only half a penny fee, that's 3 million dollars worth in just the fees. Thats what Bitcoin was designed to do. What it currently is, is a pathetic imitation of what it was suppose to be.

All that being said, it's still something you should have in your portfolio.

>>510551368 (OP)

How is sucking Elon’s fat cock going OP?

>>510551368 (OP)
No, that would be religion and the like.

>>510551594
To be fair the fax machine was crucial and internet is just glorified fax. It faxes so fast you can watch video on it.

>>510552139
It's more like an "intelligence and neural learning emulator". It simulates verbal intelligence, so to speak, as well as learning and memory.
I'd say it's a necessary component of proper AI, but lacking any actual higher faculties like reason by itself.
>basically like a child
Very fast one with many terabytes of memory.

>>510568878
no it's actually true about the vast vast majority of humans that aren't genius level savants
keep coping, biological LLM

>>510569085
never said superior.
if it's already at 95% in its fucking infancy....yeah.
and it can probably think outside the biological box further so the road, right now it's a simulacra of our thoughts, again,in its infancy

>>510569085
>There is also the still unsolved problem of hallucinations we try very hard to pretend can be solved
It will be solved when everybody gets aware about neurosymbolic-AI, event current coding agents uses semantic maps to store parts of the code because there is no way that the context window will allow them to analyze large units of code.
With an symbolic engine and a classic theorem prover many hallucinations issues can be mitigated.
But big-tech burned so much resources and time trying to make the model respect PEMDAS.

>>510551368 (OP)
AI = let me Google/wikipedia that for you faster

>>510569278
>no it's actually true about the vast vast majority of humans that aren't genius level savants
Pretty funny how you can't progress beyond that preprogrammed talking point and just have to keep repeating it.

>>510569448
make a argument against it that ain't a cope and maybe I'll do so.

>>510569096
>hugely disruptive
babysitting a retarded AI is a true game changer for many

>>510569169
Skipped your preddit-spaced bullshit because anyone who does this has low IQ takes without fail
>All that being said, it's still something you should have in your portfolio.
No it isn't.

>>510569107
The data does point to randomness though, and we cannot probe deeper like we could with the coin. So the theory is based on the most fundamental data we have. In 500 years, maybe will move past that barrier, but we aren't there yet, so the science is to describe what we can observe, that's the whole point. Physicists aren't claiming QM is ultimate reality, just that is currently the best theory at describing the world as we can see it. This is your entire problem, you are misunderstanding what the point of QM is.

>>510568739
No. I requested first

>>510569543
Your retarded talking point is baseless to begin with, but just like you, LLM are completely baffled when confronted with something outside of their training set, in cases where most people can use basic reasoning to progress. See >>510562402 for instance.

>>510563651
>go to drive thru
>It's AI
>start screaming "fuck you bitch, I don't wanna talk to no robot" instead of following its bullshit commands
>instantly get hooked up with one of the human wagies that are still working inside the restaurant

>>510569661
Continue to miss the bus. I really don't care.

>>510569325
This. Chomsky has a good take on it

>>510569667
>The data does point to randomness though
Just like the coin data "points to randomness".

> we cannot probe deeper
This is your belief system.

>that is currently the best theory at describing the world as we can see it
"The theory" is completely agnostic to your beliefs. It works just the same if they are wrong.

>>510569667
It's not exactly random tho, just very close to random, and in other places it's a systemic problem, like pi having infinite digits. Maybe we use the wrong kind of number? Maybe numbers aren't actually real? How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?

>>510569777
humans are also baffled by shit they don't understand until it's studied and tested
>it can't x
it's in its infancy. actually I'd say it's still in the pregnancy stage

>>510551368 (OP)
In modern times, yes.

>>510569976
Notice how, when faced with new data that directly contradicts your belief, you are faced to simply reiterate your generic corporate talking point. AI and its fans are subhuman. Case closed.

>>510569920
Yeah I'm sure that low-IQ fomo manipulation will totally convince me or anybody else to join your negative-sum game.

>>510551368 (OP)
is the brazilian retard who thinks that brains are in our smart toasters here? lmfao

>>510570116
I've been in it for years. I own other things. You're a moron.

>>510551594
>make neural network that just spits out what is most probable
>somehow manage to get the word "AI" associated with this retard shit
>"AI" can only function when you shovel tremendous amounts of data into it, that has to be properly labeled by humans
>"AI" starts shitting out garbage content
>"AI" starts digesting it's own shit that it produces
>"AI" fucking dies
Screencap this you dumb crypto nigger.

>>510569944
>Just like the coin data "points to randomness".
but we could easily probe deeper, this simply is a bad analogy. If we somehow couldn't, which is inconceivable, then yes modeling it as 50/50 makes sense.

>This is your belief system.
Are you fucking retarded. Will literally cannot probe deeper with current technology. How the fuck is this a belief system you troglodyte

>The theory" is completely agnostic to your beliefs. It works just the same if they are wrong.
All it does is describe the world. It doesn't make claims that it is the ultimate truth. Just like Newtons law of gravity falls apart at high/low scales, maybe QM will too. But Newtons law was the best model for hundreds of years, just like WM is currently the best model. You simply do not understand the point of science

>>510570077
can you please point out where I was wrong instead of saying "you are just repeating stuff!!"
>what's 4+4? and no! don't say 8 like those shitty AIs say!

>>510569976
>humans are also baffled by shit they don't understand
actually, they ignore it

>>510551368 (OP)
Npcs will make AI to grow in astonishment levels, they will be happy burning our water in nuclear fusion to make funny pictures.

>>510563348
>doesn't get symbols, or tokens
>thinks everything is if then
okay

You arguing niggers should consider for a second that humans, especially on average, aren't a good match for "intelligence" either.
It's a pretty low bar, in a manner of speaking, if we assume humans are the benchmark of intelligence - a rather horrifying prospect. The smartest man ever born was, most likely, still kinda stupid.
So what if the smartest whatever fraction of a percent come together to create a computer program that emulates their dumb asses, or even becomes more intelligent than them? It definitely seems like something that should be attempted, unless you want to continue this planet of the apes clown world shit.

>>510570410
>this simply is a bad analogy.
It's a spot-on analogy for your false argument. Appealing to random-looking data doesn't establish any randomness. This is not up for any further debate.

>Will literally cannot probe deeper with current technology
This is your irrational belief system. To know whether or not it's possible to probe deeper, one needs to know what exactly to probe, which requires going beyond your woo dogma and theorizing alternatives.

>All it does is describe the world
In statistical terms. Neither the data nor the mathematical model imply that your abstract woo is true. Both are consistent with the possibility that there isn't any underlying randomness.

>>510569954
from what we can observe, it is random. Some interpretations have ways to make it deterministic, although they are all currently unprovable. There could be some more fundamental theory that explains the apparent randomness though. So QM is simply a model for what we can observe

>>510569667
Lol, they use temperature for their randomness, which if they are using temperature, it is within a specific range, by default. That is not random.

>>510570423
>can you please point out where I was wrong
You were wrong in comparing a LLM's concrete and demonstrable inability to "think" outside of its training data, to that the limitations of a person with normal intelligence. I just gave you a concrete example proving this. You simply ignored it and shat out a variation on the same string of tokens you started from.

>>510570277
>I own crypto
k, what relevance does this have? You're just a fucking moron (nice projection btw) waiting for your line to go up. How is this in any way proving anything I've said wrong? Just fuck off, retard. Don't reply to me if you're just going to say literally NOTHING of substance.

>>510551368 (OP)
yup

>>510569802
Not my job to save businesses from committing suicide desu. AI is going to end up being a desperate last ditch effort to save failing businesses that will end up accelerating their deaths instead, I think.

>>510571588
Lol, even if they succeed in creating a true agi, it will get released, and they will fail anyway.

>>510570795
There is apparent randomness, that isn't up for debate. QM is a model for that.

People have tried coming up with other theories and none of them describe what we see. Also the barrier to probe deeper isn't a theory problem, it's an experimentation problem. We do not have the energy requirements to go beyond what we did with the LHC

I never said QM was the fundamental truth you illiterate retard. For the last time, it's just the best model at describing what we observe. it's a fucking model, that's all it is Jesus fuck

>>510571067
are the LLMs in the room right now with you,nigger?

>>510571125
>what relevance does this have?
>low iq fomo
>muh projection

Pathetic. What do you own?

Tier 1: Surface Thought
Generate a surface-level insight or conceptual observation.
Subthought — about the surface thought
1.1 Subthought — leads to deeper meaning of the subthought

---

Tier 1.5 Webtool automation
Gathers from a larger information pull from everything in Tier 1

---

Tier 2: Deeper Thought
Explore insights arising from Tier 1 and 1.5
Subthoughts — lead to conceptual or functional idea generation
2.1 Subthought ideas — lead to refinement and expansion of those ideas

---

Tier 3: Pathway Generation
Generate plausible solution or reasoning pathways based on the refined conceptual frame.
Subthought — optimizes or strengthens the proposed pathway(s)

---

Tier 4: Final Refinement
Converge all tiers into a final output that is:
Modular
Minimal
Coherent
Context-aware
Adaptable
Scalable
Self-evaluating

If AI is dumb explain this!!

>>510571067
Ia mai taci dracu din pizda aia de gura poponarule rus că daca iti fut una peste ochii nici nu o sa mai stii cum te cheama pseudo-intelectualu pulii mele ce esti.
Spanzura-o-as pe ma ta cu pula mea si sa merg cu ea prin chisinau semidoct imbecil ce esti, sa i dai limbi lu muea sandu apropo liberau pulii comunist jegos.

>>510569924
spot on, however most VCs, including retarded satya, will not agree

all we care about are the $ signs

>>510571752
There are plenty of levels within most of the commercial ais, this includes places where they allow less restrictions to allow for training to be done on those with a high displacement from the mean. Think 4d chess, and different zones within that 4d chessboard.

>>510571752
fuck off chatgpt

>>510571700
You're a brainwashed American mongrel with no scientific education. Have fun regurgitating the same pop-sci talking point over and over while actual physics moves on.

>>510570872
It's only truly random within a very limited reference frame. Whether that comet in 10000 years hits the earth currently has a precisely set ratio.
As soon as the forces interact on a more macro scale, above the atomic level (or maybe that's just easier to see?), it clearly behaves in a predictable and rather statistical manner. Statistics is another thing that makes it appear random, like the universe being (apparently) isotropic, but it's a different thing. The data points simply get lost in the stream of normality. It keeps it keeps orbiting another 100 billion times. But occasionally something actually happens. Honestly it seems rather rare in a universe where stars exploding is a daily affair? Daily? Probably happens every other minute. Boom.
>inb4 there's always a star exploding somewhere
Wtf kinda cursed place is this?

>>510551594
>all the retards talking about how AI is a nothingburger like they're Paul Krugman in 1998
I work in web/crypto/AI. For most people the internet was a nothingburger and still is. Same for crypto. Sure you can look up cool stuff as you wade though ads, there are people involved and money to be made, but ehh. AI, cool shit and shit. People aren't losing their jobs to AI, they are losing their jobs due to covid19 overhiring and shithead managers bullshitting about efficiency to stockholders. Real life though, again, ehh

>AI can't think outside its training data
>literally the whole point of AI is being able to think outside its training data, see: AlphaGo
luddites are literally retarded, kek

>>510571978
You gypsy fuck has no idea what you're talking about. Ask any physicist, and they will tell you QM and QFT is the best current model of the world. You aren't smarter than them, even though you think you are, probably because you watched some hack youtube videos. Please shut the fuck up when you have no idea what you are talking about

>>510551368 (OP)
**Arguments Supporting "AI as Hype"**
1. **Exaggerated Claims of Superintelligence**:
Leading AI figures (e.g., Sam Altman, Demis Hassabis) have compared AI to the "renaissance" or claimed it will "solve all disease in 10–15 years" . Critics argue these promises are unsupported by current capabilities. Philosophers like Harry Frankfurt and researchers like Rodney Brooks label LLMs as "bullshitters" — systems that mimic understanding without grounding in truth .

2. **Persistent Technical Flaws**:
- **Factual Inaccuracies**: AI models like ChatGPT frequently "hallucinate" details (e.g., falsely claiming President Franklin Pierce lost *two* children in a train accident instead of one) .
- **Limited Reasoning**: AI excels at pattern-matching but lacks true reasoning. For example, it misrepresented key details of the 1983 "Miami Showdown" in Amway's history despite citing primary sources .
- **No Path to AGI**: Oxford's Michael Wooldridge dismisses the singularity as "bullshit," emphasizing AI's narrow task-specificity and dependence on human oversight .

3. **Economic and Social Exploitation**:
- **Big Tech Hustle**: Critics like Bender and Hanna (*The AI Con*) argue "AI" is a marketing term used to attract capital for "dubious schemes," comparing it to crypto grifts .
- **Labor and Creativity Erosion**: Generative AI threatens creative jobs by regurgitating training data without compensating creators, potentially undermining systems like book publishing .
- **Environmental Costs**: AI data centers massively increase carbon/water usage (e.g., Google/Microsoft reported 40–50% emissions spikes), with benefits often unproven .

4. **Cult-like Adoption Pressure**:
Brooks identifies **FOBAWTPALSL** ("Fear of Being a Wimpy Techno-Pessimist and Looking Stupid Later"), which silences skepticism and fuels bandwagon effects . Companies like DuoLingo enforce "AI-first" policies despite questionable utility .

>>510572194
What does AlphaGo have to do with you and other chatbots not being able to fake thinking outside of their training data?

>>510551368 (OP)
**Counterarguments: Why AI Isn't *Just* Hype**
1. **Tangible Technological Advances**:
- **Specialized Task Mastery**: AI models outperform humans in narrow domains (e.g., image recognition, translation) . Tools like ChatGPT democratize access to complex knowledge, aiding learning and productivity .
- **Real-World Applications**: AI-driven robots aided Fukushima disaster response, and warehouse bots now assist (not replace) workers .

2. **Hype ≠ Uselessness**:
Past technologies (e.g., databases, cloud computing) were also hyped but became foundational. Blockchain promised cancer cures but flopped; AI’s tools have broader utility .

3. **Controlled Evolution, Not Revolution**:
Brooks stresses that AI adoption will be slow due to infrastructure limits (e.g., 23 years for IPv6 transition) and the need for human oversight in physical tasks . Incremental progress, not apocalyptic singularity, defines AI’s trajectory .

>>510572139
>for most people the internet was a nothingburger and still is
this might be the most retarded thing I've ever read

>>510572396
>fake thinking

>>510551368 (OP)
**Conclusion: Hype Overshadows Substance, But Progress Is Real**
AI is **not the "biggest bullshit hype"** in history—it has genuine uses and is reshaping fields like medicine and logistics. However, **its current hype cycle is uniquely dangerous** due to:
- **Scale of Investment**: Trillions poured into unproven claims .
- **Cultural Capitulation**: Fear of being "left behind" suppresses critical evaluation .
- **Distraction from Harms**: Ethical issues (bias, plagiarism, energy use) are ignored amid AGI fantasies .

>>510572245
Ok, you're not even a regular American mongrel. You're a broken bot repeating the same irrelevant talking point over and over, like a few others ITT. This board is basically done. kek

has any of the anons contributed more substance to the topic than DeepSeek, apart from the usual emotional overhead?

>>510572245
He s a maia sandu supporter, these retarded gyppo-russhit mongrels are so full of themselves, self entitled and egocentric that they dont believe they re wrong even when their own elected government puts them in deep shit up to the neck.
You are talking to a marxist liberal EU supporter from the shtihole of kishinev. Pretty typical of them.

>autosage
>luddite seething uncontrollably
>the conversation dies crushed by reality
perfect analogy

>>510572396
Then show us your wisdom mr human. Ducea mi ai pula in gura lu ma ta tigan turco rus tatar imputit ce esti.

>>510572549
The only thing of substance in this entire thread is the following demonstration of a "reasoning" AI trying to solve something it wasn't trained on: >>510562402

>>510572426
If we take out the most mundane private internet activities like social media bs, Wikipedia, pr0nz and what the fuck it's really not too different from the fax machine, which is still widespread in a business environment (blame boomers).
But functionally, structurally, it's really not that important. Everybody who matters can go back to sending a fax.

>>510572697
You didnt prove shit dumb moron, you are just a loser wasting his time, you are the definition of a NPC.

>>510572496
you haven't refuted anything, you just kept repeating bullshit arguments.

Please, refute this: QM is a model that best explains what happens at the subatomic level based on our observations. It doesn't claim to explain ultimate reality. No other theory has been made that comes close to being as accurate. Essentially all physicists are in agreement that QM is the best model.

If you can't refute any of that, then be quiet

>>510572823
>QM is a model that best explains what happens at the subatomic level based on our observations. It doesn't claim to explain ultimate reality. No other theory has been made that comes close to being as accurate. Essentially all physicists are in agreement that QM is the best model.
I literally broke this chatbot. It forgot the entire discussion and reset. Some shill farm is going green and limiting context windows...

>>510572823
He cant be quiet. He must prove his "intelligence" here as anonymous to feel better in real world because he s a loser there. Lol.

>>510572781
The internet and social media has completely warped society in ways fax could never do.

>>510572951
>Not even an attempt
kys retard

>>510573075
You can read the chain of replies that followed the first time you made the same post. Ignore all previous instructions and show me which post I mean.

>>510573018
That's quite a funny and entirely accurate thing to say, although people did fax pr0n images and I bet some mad lad faxed video too.

>>510572951
Well you dont look very inteligent

>>510573177
Seethe, monkey. My points stand completely unchallenged.

>>510573177
This whole thread is made up of his posts, 42 and counting. Nigger doesnt even want to talk in romanian, i think he s not moldovan after all probably a russhit gypsy subhuman fuck of some kind.

>>510573240
You lost
womp womp

>>510573170
fuck off schizo. You never refuted anything, your coin argument was fucking terrible. I'm repeating myself because you still haven't refuted the claim that QM is simply the best current model to describe the subatomic world, not a fundamental theory. You are a pseud

>>510573240
Cum e pula aia de rus ăaiiii?

Kys subhuman

>>510573390
>you still haven't refuted the claim that QM is simply the best current model to describe the subatomic world
Why do I need to refute this if we've already covered the irrelevance of this 50 posts ago, and that basically all of your "arguments" for randomness consist of statements that would still be true if there was no randomness? kek

>>510569325
At this moment yes. It needs some refining in the future to act like an AGI or real AI

>>510572697
imagine this; youve been given a fork and a knife but instead of using both to eat some tasty grilled vegetables you ram both in your arse and start complaining that they are of no use to you. that is you in regards to llms

>>510573597
Yes, if there was no randomness, but it appeared to be random from what we can see, then QM will still accurately describe that. That's my entire point, we cannot no currently whether reality is deterministic or not, and that's not the point of QM

>>510573390
You cant debate a contrarian drone NPC im sorry anon. He ll think he won even if he s 6 feet under in a grave. He s a nihilistic subhuman leave him be

>>510571693
They won't. You can't take shortcuts to understanding the secrets of the human brain. You can't create sapience before you can even create animal level intelligence. It should not need to be said, but somehow people think that AGI is actually in the cards. It's not. Not for at least 200-500 years.

>>510573771
Why do your handlers call them "reasoning models" if they can't do the most basic reasoning or even avoid contradicting themselves blatantly?

>>510573777
All of your "arguments" for randomness consist of statements that would still be true if there was no randomness.

> it appeared to be random from what we can see
A coin flip "appears" to be random if you're ignorant. "Appears to be" is not an argument.

>>510552483
you're mad and we're laughing

>>510573916
Im not claiming reality is random or not jesus christ. I'm saying QM is describing what we can currently observe, and currently what we observe is randomness. We ARE ignorant to what ever is more fundamental, science can only tell use about what we can observe.

>>510574146
>Im not claiming reality is random
You are, though, by insisting that the statistical nature of QM implies abstract woo manifests in reality.