20 years from now? 50?

Not valuable at all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsdQeAGakL0

>>510578718 (OP)
Completely worthless in 20 years or less, if not already. Gone in 50. Credentialism dies with boomers. It actually is a legitimate form of discrimination.

>>510578718 (OP)
they will move online and sell the campuses for poc living spaces

>>510578718 (OP)
Soon, everything will matter less and less. Got cancer? Fuck it. Got aids? Fuck it. Jeets Chinks Arabs and Niggers are tearing down society at an incredibly fast rate. We will soon return to barbarianism and only select few will still maintain what appears to be remnants of civilization.

>>510578718 (OP)
Except for things like medicine and some elite degrees in STEM, everybody is better off just starting to work and learning over the Internet.

>>510578718 (OP)
Degrees completed before genAI will still have value. Their value will decline as genAI continues to evolve, except at institutions that transition to all assessments being in the form of in-person exams.

>>510578718 (OP)
About 90% - 95% valuable as it is now and has been on average for the last century. We have a concept called "educational devaluation", which is a relative measure between a living standards measure and the number of years of formal education.

For example, in the 1950's someone with 12 years formal education could live a middle class lifestyle (C1 equivalent) with a decent home and 2 cars. Now that requirement is 16 years. Meaning we have in 75 years, a total of 4 years of educational devaluation.

But you won't have accountants, solicitors, engineers, or doctors without degrees - which means the degrees retain their value for those faculties.
The issue is in the humanities, where fine arts, literature, or the worse of them all, social anthropology, are given degree status when they are little more than daycare centres for vapid bleeding cunts trying to get drunk and pregnant.

>>510578859
>(((Caplan)))
Be my plumber goy.