>>510589212The US hasn’t ever been btfo.
The US lost Afghanistan because we failed to turn them into faggot trannies.
Oh, but we won on killcount by a factor of 100:1, and when we left we “accidentally” left a few billion dollars of equipment on China’s weakest border, right next to the region the chicoms have been ethnically cleansing muslims. Oopsie daisy ::headpat bleh::
The US lost in Vietnam because we failed to make them into another South Korea, but we won on killcount by a factor of 200:1 and tested out Agent Orange, Blue, Magenta, Purple, Fuschia, and any other concoction we didn’t want to use somewhere we could smell it. Now they make my shoes. Oopsie
The US lost in Korea, because we didn’t free the northern half of the country from Stalinist enslavement, but we won on killcount by a factor of 50:1, and created a little proxy Japan in the South with a near 100% circumcision rate. China won by propping up an unhinged concentration camp that they can’t disavow. Oopsie
I refuse to believe that any of the enemies of America are stupid enough to not understand what happens even if we “lose” a war.
Maybe that’s what China really wants: to take 200:1 casualties invading Taiwan, and to have Americans firebomb Shanghai in response. It’ll solve their excess male dilemma. They’re not worried about the fires— the chicoms know that the floodwaters from the 3 gorges dam burst will put it out. And then they’ll do what they always do, eat corpses of the weaker chinsects and achieve a decisive Tang victory. Oopsie
The only conflict I am actually worried about as an American who has been paying attention is Iran, because we can’t send a typhoon in, and because kikes are completely out of touch with reality with respect to what victory would cost.
The good news is that kikes are weak, and without material support from better men they are destined to scurry like rats, like they have from 109 nations or 1337 city states or whatever the count is