>>510595152I don't think you understand
if we entangle 8 electrons in a row, 8 for you, and 8 for me
And we travel apart
and I measure them as if it were a binary string, e.g. 00100100 with the 1's corresponding to the electrons I've measured
You, on the other end, cannot tell that I measured anything. There is no signal from the electron saying "I've been measured and my entanglement has collapsed"
To know what the spin of your electrons are, you have to measure them also
And when you measure them their collapse will be completely random for you
you cannot tell which electron superpositions were collapsed already by me
If you want actual real faster than light travel, it's theoretically possible with negative gravity and wormholes and some kind of universal "accounting trick" which forces any travel through a wormhole to undergo time dilation (according to the relativistic dilation between two wormhole points) that intrinsically prevents causality violations