Thread 510598160 - /pol/ [Archived: 335 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: 5oLgSLkUUnited States
7/17/2025, 5:24:26 AM No.510598160
1752722651901
1752722651901
md5: 9a4656ffd09b9f7a48c4808e9086a959🔍
How do we fix this
Replies: >>510598330 >>510598714 >>510598904 >>510600339
Anonymous ID: k9G45sFoUnited States
7/17/2025, 5:27:49 AM No.510598330
>>510598160 (OP)
bury that shitjeet?
Replies: >>510598824
Anonymous ID: oNqrWF5gCanada
7/17/2025, 5:34:38 AM No.510598714
800px-Expenditure_on_pensions,_by_type_of_pension,_2022_(_,_relative_to_GDP)_SPS2025_V2
>>510598160 (OP)
I wonder....
>Expenditure on pensions was equivalent to 12.2% of the EU’s GDP in 2022.
Anonymous ID: /pzl/Sq4United States
7/17/2025, 5:36:37 AM No.510598824
>>510598330
I agree with anon. Bullying Indians will probably improve things.
Anonymous ID: AZUDLgQa
7/17/2025, 5:38:00 AM No.510598904
1752359526386479
1752359526386479
md5: c77a5cc7667631711977a9337dc10c20🔍
>>510598160 (OP)
Anonymous ID: 6eMNJ5f5United States
7/17/2025, 6:05:13 AM No.510600339
>>510598160 (OP)
the idea was the charging based on fuel usage was a good way to approximate how much wear&tear vehicles (especially semies, that tear up roads) were doing on a road. if fuel usage is no longer a good approximation (thought it is for semis because theyre too heavy to be battery operated) then you have to go to another metric

miles driven is good but requires extremely invasive ways for the govt to measure. a better way may be to still charge normal traffic on fuel used, but charge commercial traffic, like semis, based on their weight and miles, since they log that stuff extensively already. this aint without its downsides, to be sure.