>>510635725 (OP)
Where's Trump's name?

no document would use typefaces/formatting that hard to read

>>510635890
Omitted

>>510635890
Wasn't named in the court documents found here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66683865/government-of-the-united-states-virgin-islands-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-na/?page=3

>>510636010
Yes he was

>>510636182
Link to the document? I went through all of them and didn't see that. Also why is it so blurry?

>>510635725 (OP)
>Bill Gates listed twice
actually makes it more believable as a straight extract without any extra editing

>>510636221
You posted the link already. >>510636010

>>510636221
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66683865/237/6/government-of-the-united-states-virgin-islands-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-na/

>>510636323
Yeah, but which document? Clearly it says 07-25-23 so I am looking in July for that document.

>>510636340
That's a Jew York Times article.

>>510635725 (OP)
nothingburger.

>>510636439
Okay well you asked for a link and I gave it to you?

>>510636439
Just search "Trump." I am on my mobile right now.

This is one of the biggest bombshells we uncovered last night. Pic related shows Trump appointed Acosta to Secretary of Labor after Acosta gave Epstein a sweetheart plea deal.

>>510636688
Oh no, don't misunderstand. Thank you for the link. But that is a Jew York Times article and not a trustworthy source of information.

All the names in the list I created are from direct emails from Epstein to someone else that directly reference the name on the list.

Take Pic Related as an example of what I consider "good enough" evidence to link someone directly to Epstein. This is Epstein saying that Sean Parker is literally at his house at that moment.

Another example, this is Jeffrey Epstein saying that he is directly referring Kathy Ruemmler to JPMORGAN as a potential client.

>>510637092
Musk got subpoenad as well for something like that, suspected or otherwise idk. I think it was bullshit though honestly, seemed like a dart throw. Trump might be retarded and risky enough to pump up the Epstein files if he was guilty of something, but I cannot see Musk doing that.

>>510636702
>after he gave Epstein a sweetheart plea deal
11 years after
It's not good enough, its a one step removed relations to Epstein sorta-kinda like with Alan Deshowitz and Nick Ribis which I already mention in the list, and certainly not enough to say that there was a business relationship there like with the example of Sean Parker I give above.

Give me an email of Jeffrey Epstein directly contacting Donald Trump or one of his staff.

I would even accept a direct reference to Donald Trump in an email from Jeffrey Epstein as acceptable evidence.