was never on the Lolita Express btw, in fact he never even met Jeffrey

nothing to see here folks

Niggers

Nigger

>>510641103 (OP)
Maybe he doesn't remember? He is as old as Biden...

>>510643723
Then it should be easy to jog his memory by showing him the documents

>>510641103 (OP)
his retard room temp iq cult followers will most likely forget by tomorrow, they already saying how raping little girls is actually based kek

bump

>>510644716
This article is a doozy. It couldn’t be anymore obvious what he’s into

>>510641103 (OP)
JE bought the island in 2002 though

>>510644979
Ya and before that he had properties all over the place . Palm beach was his playground and that’s when he first came on the authorities radar

>>510641103 (OP)
>>510641674
First entry and second entries are flights from Palm Beach to New York. Second set of entries is a a flight from Palm Beach to DC and then back to Palm Beach.

>>510641103 (OP)
>>510641674
Neither of those flights went to Epstein's island.

>>510645043
Trump banned Epstein from his properties and was a witness to the FBI during their investigation of Epstein.

>>510645330
>>510645208
Why was he on the plane at all? Why did he lie about not being on the plane?

>>510644951
New one just dropped, although the interview is CNN

>>510645412
Trump “banned” epstein from Maralago after knowing him for years and lied when he said epstein was never a member

>>510645752
Nice

>>510645330
>we have the list
>actually there is no list
>actually the dems made up the list
>its a hoax
>I never knew the guy
>I wasn't on the plane

Trump also signed his daughter up with Elite Modeling when she was 14, during the time it was riddled with sexual misconduct allegations.

.

>>510644784
this thread is being slide, I didn't fight for this men didn't die for this.

>>510646174
I have thousands of videos of people raping children but i will not tell you lolol

>>510641103 (OP)
>>510641674
Old shit long debunked.
Muskrats getting desperate.

>>510641103 (OP)
> Lolita Express
The plane was never called the Lolita Express. The people who flew on that plane were not necessarily involved in sex with minors. Calling it Lolita Express implies that they were, which is just guilt by association. Yet we see journalists using this term all the time, as if it were true. The whole story is a tapestry of uncorroborated rumors, fantasies, wish fulfillment, coupled with crass desire to exploit the theme, to get clicks, make money and develop a career.
If you ask Epstein true believers for their evidence, they lash out at you. The ones who believe it most have the least evidence. They just know.
> It's common sense
> I don't have to explain it
> You must be a shill if you doubt it
I just saw a clip from WhatIsTruthTV (rumble) that claimed that children younger than teens were also involved. But the video provided no proof, no evidence, and went on a detour into the Franklin Scandal, and surmised that since this other guy offered kids 7 or 8 years old, Epstein must also have done so.
What kind of reasoning is that? It's not evidence-based. It's reckless. And it amounts to nothing. People have been turned into dogs chasing their own tail of thought. They don't even know what's real or well proven or made up. They don't know where they get their facts. They don't read books. They don't care to come across as anything but a crazy conspiracy theorist.
Don't people tire of this nonsense?

>>510641103 (OP)
>>510641674
Yes this clearly an invoice for child sex slaves. We got the orange fascist right where we want him.

>>510641103 (OP)
From Palm Beach to New Jersey and back. From PBI to DC.

>>510648127
So what you're saying is, the document clearly shows that Donald Trump is a child sex slave?
Incredible.

>>510649110
Guess I'll just have to wait for those receipts to magically show up, maybe in two more weeks.

>>510645330
>Neither of those flights went to Epstein's island.
No flights ever went to Epstein's island, it doesn't have an airport and is only accessible by boat, seaplane or helicopter.
>>510645412
>Trump banned Epstein from his properties
Only after Epstein was arrested the first time.
>and was a witness to the FBI during their investigation of Epstein.
This is a lie.

>>510648075
Yes. And I just know that you don’t eat pork or work on Saturdays

>>510649270
May I see the ship manifest?

>>510648075
> Calling it Lolita Express implies that they were, which is just guilt by association
The person whose guilt is being unfairly assumed has the power to release all of the evidence and exhonerate himself at any time, yet he chooses not to. Odd.

Crazy how a completely innocent person won't exonerate himself with the evidence he has.

>>510649486
So no evidence, then?

>>510650025
What if the evidence is made from pure 100% nothingburger meat?

>>510649802
>another jewbot doing non-sequiturs
Sure is a lot of this right now. /ptg/ must be having a fit.

>>510650204
What evidence?

>>510650466
Things are bought and receipts are kept. Ships require manifests. These things would have been found via investigation if they existed.

>>510650204
Well if it's a pure nothingburger that would be a problem in a different direction, because Trump hired all these Epstein-pilled people like Patel and Bongino and it turns out they're so fucking incompetent that they've been chasing shadows all this time. Not the sort of instincts I want in an FBI director.

>>510650605
The evidence which will be revealed in two more weeks live on Tucker.

>>510650724

>>510649843
The "evidence" so far is that some people flew on a plane. You insist on evidence to prove that those people did not partake in an alleged sex trafficking scheme. You want Trump to prove a negative, which is impossible. There's a reason why we have the assumption
> innocent until proven guilty
People are not proven innocent. They are proven guilty. But in this case, for anyone who rode on the falsely named Lolita Express, the logic is reversed. They must be proven innocent.

In the UK they opened a number of inquiries into "historical abuse" cases, usually of an institutional nature. These tended to end in controversy as they attracted attention seekers, the mentally ill, and others whom enthusiastic prosecutors believed, but were often later proven liars. So even if we get another Church Committee, it's not clear that we'll ever know the truth beyond smearing a bunch of people who may or may not have done it. Irreparable damage has been done to public figures without any confidence that they were actually guilty of any crimes.

What is the value of such investigations?

In my view, a more Church Committee investigation is in order, into the intel agencies themselves. Epstein could be a part of that, with special focus on who he was working for, how he managed to operate on US soil for so long, having rubbed shoulders with prominent people for decades, while being known as intelligence.

But why would we trust anything that came out of that investigation, given how cooked the books must be by now, after 3 different Presidential terms. Anything the intel agencies haven't destroyed, anything the Biden administration hasn't destroyed, Trump has destroyed.

But somehow we're going to get the truth out of this. Not likely. Not ever.

And that, my friend, is what it means to live under a fake democracy under the rule of the intelligence agencies. Which is the real point of interest.

>>510652063
shit's a bit fucked mon ami

>>510649843
didnt you hear Pam Bondi? We have over 10,000 videos of high profile people raping children AND YOU GET NONE OF IT

All of your CP & Blackmail are belong to us

Bump

3.5 more years faggots!

Then JD for 8 more!

From Florida to NJ you fucking retard.
We all knew this.
>>510641103 (OP)
>was never on the Lolita Express btw, in fact he never even met Jeffrey

>>510656668
>>510656571
Thou art hebraic