>>510674643let me sum it up for all the contrarians on here.
NATO has;
- 6x the GDP of Russia
- Better tech
- More vehicles
- Better training
- More soldiers
Russia has;
- more experience
here, let some journa do some numbers for you, dumb cunt.
"In April, Putin launched Russia's biggest conscription drive in over a decade, as he looks to boost the number of active servicemen to 1.5 million. While this would give Russia a bigger army than the US alone, it still falls well behind Nato's collective might. According to Statista, Nato has 3,439,197 active soldiers. Russia has only about 4,957 military aircraft compared with Nato's combined 22,377, and 339 military ships compared to Nato's 1,143. Russia is decisively outnumbered by Nato for tanks (5,750 to 11,495), and in terms of armoured vehicles overall its stock of 131,527 is dwarfed by Nato's 971,280.
The two forces are evenly matched in terms of known nuclear capability, with the Nato nuclear powers – the US, UK and France – able to field 5,559 nuclear warheads to Russia's 5,580."
cope and dilate loser.