Low IQ Americans shouldn't be allowed to vote. American voters should be required to take an annual IQ test

>>510688546 (OP)
The NAACP would file a lawsuit immediately.

>>510688546 (OP)
only land owning men should be able to vote as our founding fathers intended

>>510688546 (OP)
Rural retards not being able to vote would make every state blue though.

>>510688876
niggers vote blue and niggers cant pass a test worth shit

>>510688546 (OP)
I think everyone has a right to vote but not with the same power. IQ/100 would be a simple way to determine your voting power. Of course there should be other factors included in a VoteValue™ algorithm.

>>510688546 (OP)

>>510688876
>>510688980
so nothing would change, as per usual.

>>510688546 (OP)
But without the retard vote how would the media be able to control the outcome of elections?
>>510688693
The campaign should use exclusively rednecks and Walmart shoppers to throw them off the scent. It's mean, but would be worth doing if it could actually get the law through.

>>510688546 (OP)
https://youtu.be/MU1aD0xbNOw?si=c16wchJnuaPxXmn1

>>510688546 (OP)
>>510689001
These sort of proposals would give unbelievable political power to whoever's administering the tests at any level.
There's no way in hell it wouldn't be corrupt from the start.

>>510688546 (OP)
Even the very inventors of democracy - Greeks - knew that multi-ethnic multi-racial democracy can never work its an impossibility.
Of course, anyone with more than a single braincell immediately understand this to be true - in a racial and cultural jungle there will always be competing interests.

That is why only a person born to TWO Athenian parents could be a citizen - and only an Athenian citizen could vote.
Ancient Greece was the world's first White ethnostate democracy.
But I bet they left that part out in your civics class due to kiked schooling

>>510689655
So the ONLY people that should be able to vote in a White nation should be a White person born to TWO White parents.

But due to the age of internet, non-white propaganda could still reach the people so democracy is kinda fucked anyway.
This is where fascism comes in as the better alternative, it is much harder for foreign hostile tribes like jews to subvert it, when there are clear laws about that only native White people can stay in the territory and get into government, and any treasonous mingling with jews or other infiltrators would be punished with death.

>>510689772

>In this Anglo-French world there exists, as it were, democracy, which means the rule of the people by the people. Now the people must possess some means of giving expression to their thoughts or their wishes. Analysing this problem more closely, we see that the people themselves have originally no convictions of their own. Their convictions are learned, of course, just as everywhere else. The decisive question is who enlightens the people, who educates them
>In those countries, it is actually capital that rules; that is, nothing more than a clique of a few hundred men who possess untold wealth and, as a consequence of the peculiar structure of their national life, are more or less independent and free. They say: 'Here we have liberty.' By this they mean, above all, an uncontrolled economy, and by an uncontrolled economy, the freedom not only to acquire capital but to make absolutely free use of it. That means freedom from national control or control by the people both in the acquisition of capital and in its employment. This is really what they mean when they speak of liberty.

>These capitalists create their own press and then speak of the 'freedom of the press.'
>In reality, every one of the newspapers has a master, and in every case this master is the capitalist, the owner. This master, not the editor, is the one who directs the policy of the paper. If the editor tries to write other than what suits the master, he is ousted the next day. This press, which is the absolutely submissive and characterless slave of the owners, molds public opinion.

>Public opinion thus mobilized by them is, in its turn, split up into political parties. The difference between these parties is as small as it formerly was in Germany. You know them, of course - the old parties. They were always one and the same.
>These parties, with this press, they control public opinion.

- Adolf Hitler - Speech to the Workers of Berlin, 10 December 1940

>>510689801
Interestingly that speech could have been written today, thats how relevant it still is.
How jews can use media and even schooling to steer White people into jewish thinking that destroys White nations, like multiculturalism and by large allowing jewish parasites to live amongst our midst.

>>510689071
the iq level of the debates and propaganda would have to go up because theyre not trying to convince literal retards about things. thats a win