>>510704194>picYour graph is incorrect.
I'll explain it as simply as I can :
If you take all the humans in History that made it to adulthood
- About 80% of all females reproduced
- While only about 40% of males have reproduced.
That's 2x as many women.
This also means you have twice as many female anestors than male ancestors.
You'd think this Historic Hypergamy must have been long ago, but that's not the case.
Even during the strictly monogamous middle age era, this trend stays true.
Combine the sexual revolution with new communication technology and you have exacerbated the sexual competition between men, as well as made sexual promiscuity, divorce and polygamy socially acceptable.
Also on a statistic level, your pic is also incorrect.
There's a 2023 PEW Research poll in the US that showed that 63% of men under 30 were single, compared to only 34% of women under 30.
See? There it is again, that 2x factor imbalance.
One of the reasons is that a significant amount of women under 30 are dating men over 30, but it doesn't account for the full discrepency.
The gap goes down from 30 points down to 10.
There's a documented increase in men, especially young men, being single or even virgins.
Studies show single men are lonelier than single women, and that male loneliness is increasing, leading the "Male Loneliness Epidemic".
This is not happening on the women's side.
See the issue?
Of course, a lot of "chuds", /pol/ users, manosphereniggers and far right incels that say "80% of women go for the top 10% of men" is not true.
Hypergamy is real, but often overstated, especially on here.
The principle of hypergamy is that women don't date below their own score.
They either date someone at their level or higher, but that doesn't mean 2/10 fugly women only go for 10/10 gigachads.
That's just a stupid exageration.
There exists delusional women, but those are the exception rather than the rule.