>>510722954>t. retarded neocon good goy suburbaniteThere's a few levels of retardation in your post so I'll try and point them out as best I can/
>Implying the options are either suburban tract housing, rural farms, or cities>Conflating suburbs with small townsSuburbs are not the same as small towns. Suburbs and small towns are two different types of communities that have a lot of geographic, cultural, architectural, and socioeconomic differences. Small towns are scattered across the country, with some of the best examples in New England and the Midwest. They're typically older communities with a long history, and a deep connection to the region and local culture. They're often more conservative and preserve a lot of the regional art and cuisine and politics and culture. Suburbs are much newer developments, mostly from the mid and late 20th century, and they're typically found on the edges of large cities and major metro areas. They're usually newer, planned developments that tend to attract mid-to-high income educated professionals who typically hold liberal attitudes and often commute to nearby cities to work.
Suburbs suck ass and are one of the purified forms of globohomo culture, much like the malls that go hand-in-hand with these shitty suburban communities. Don't get me wrong, there are nice things about suburbs, and they're often better than cities for raising a family, but it a pure globohomo pseudo-culture. Mast produced, consumer culture that was pushed on gentiles. The newer version of this is all the "New Urbanism" bullshit about "high density" and "mixed-use" developments.
Pic related is a good example of a small town in Vermont. A small town and suburbs are two completely different types of community. You live in the suburbs, probably outside of some major city, not in a "little town".