FULL RETARD MODE

Reminder, if you're suing for defamation the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (Trump).

So either the letter doesn’t exist and he’ll humiliate himself by losing in court because he has no evidence, or it does exist and he’s about to prove it’s real when forensics confirm its his drawing/signature.

>>510767510 (OP)
>The xitter rants are getting more deranged
Meds, Donald.

>>510767510 (OP)
Doesn't matter, Murdoch will likely settle this case and give Trump tens of millions just to avoid going to discovery. Trump already got $30 million from ABC and 60 Minutes using the same tactic.

>>510767510 (OP)
You are a moron, if the letter doesn't exist (as in WSJ can't provide it during discovery) the entire basis for the WSJ article was built on a willful lie and thus Trump wins.

>>510767510 (OP)
The beauty of you retarded mother fuckers is that you never give up being publicly retarded.

>>510767704
Pedos in control.

>>510767704
Wrong. Trump has to prove WSJ knew it was false, not just that they were wrong. But WSJ says they saw the letter in Epstein’s album, with other witnesses. If that holds up, their testimony alone could sink him.

And lets be real, we all know it exists and he's on the list.

>>510767510 (OP)
>imagine not realizing he will get the most loyal MIGA chudge to rig this case in his favor

>>510768269
If the letter can't be produced during discovery, that means the WSJ lied about having it, and its impossible to construct and argument based around the fact they didn't know because the article directly said they have the letter.

>>510768504
No, they claim they saw it, that's a big difference.

>>510767510 (OP)
>suing for defamation the burden of proof is on the plaintiff
no it's not.
If a neighbor said i was on 4chan on july 18th, he isn't also allowed to go through my computer to prove it. he would have to subpoena 4chan first. he would also have to prove he found out before his claim.

>>510769182
>he isn't also allowed to go through my computer to prove it.
True, but you would have to prove he is willfully lying.

Why does he put random words in speech marks? Does he know what speech marks are for?

>>510769576
it's old boomer grammar for emphasis.
You can tell who is over 60 when they do that.

>>510767510 (OP)
>POWERHOUSE
LAW & ORDER

>>510769003
>>510768269
They have to prove they saw it you retard. If they can't prove the letter is even real, then Trump wins.

If they can prove it's real, but they can't prove Trump wrote it, Trump wins again.

>>510767510 (OP)
He’s already bullied two media companies he had absolutely no case against into submission

>>510767510 (OP)
>We will, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
soon
The American Dream is not to live it, but dream about it.

>>510767695
>Trump just get bribes
Amazing

>>510767510 (OP)
obligatory

>>510767510 (OP)
>So either the letter doesn’t exist and he’ll humiliate himself by losing in court
If the letter doesn't exist then he wins. Because the publication was slander.
Is your name Mohammed?

>>510768269
wsj can't use the "we read it, trust us." defense. They need to bring it, or pay up.

>>510767510 (OP)
wasnt the letter from epstein's scrapbook? cant they dust the letter for fingerprints and maybe even pull dna off of it? if it turns out he did send it, IMPEACHMENT TIME.

>using lawfare to tie people up.


He just used money to activate his trap card and waste everyone's time and make them talk about things while he goes and does other things.
You guys don't remember the fucking joke that the Brett Kavanagh trial and accusations were?
All court is is boomer shouting matches judged by a fellow boomer who's always going to side with the old folks and teach a lesson over actually dispensing justice.

>>510768504
problem is: there's a very good chance that the trump admin will, or have already, get someone from the FBI or DOJ or whoever can get access to epstein's scrapbook to remove the letter and burn it to ash.