>>510806144 (OP)
the nuclear family is a jewish trick

it's funny how atheists screech when you try to put them into an ideological box,
>atheism is merely the lack of belief in a gods! it has nothing to do with xyz
but in reality they all believe and vote for the exact same garbage things with almost zero divergence.

>>510806144 (OP)
What are rents like there? Job market?

>>510806144 (OP)
Amen sister

>>510807875
>>atheism is merely the lack of belief in a gods! it has nothing to do with xyz
Correct
>they all believe and vote for the exact same garbage things with almost zero divergence
You are a stupid person

>>510809136
i mean, it's statistically true, look at OP's data for example.
Christianity has actual dogma to point to yet they're all over the place in terms of politics.
atheism doesn't have official dogma, yet they almost always vote in lockstep with eachother and the jews.
dawkins and steven pinker ended up leaving the freedom from religious foundation citing how dogmatic and unthinking their
atheist peers within the organization had become, coyne left too saying it had become "quasi-religious."

>>510809476
>it's statistically true
Nope. You are.bery bad liar. Why do /pol/ Christians lie so much? Why is it so easy for you?

>>510810031
>nuh uh, ur a liar!!
what's your actual argument, kid?

>>510809476
>yet they almost always vote in lockstep with eachother and the jews.
Notnice how this clown went from >>510807875
>but in reality they all believe and vote for the exact same garbage things with almost zero divergence.
To
>well uh..they kinda vote the same..maybe.
You are a nigger

>>510807956
>What are rents like there? Job market?
Because of London bank parasites.
>Visa, mastercard, collect 4% off the revenue of every small , medium and large business
>while it is nothing for large companies, it is bankrupting small businesses en masse
>Visa and MC are controlled out of London

>>510810155
i qualified my statements with
>almost
>almost
atheism is whiniest religion in the world

>>510810088
Not only am I older than you but smarter than you.

You are a clown and a liar

>>510810261
You mean you changed your argument because you are disingenuous hack

>>510810261
>atheism is whiniest religion in the world
It's not a religion. You also know that too but continue to try and bring it down to your trash level

>>510810311
>Not only am I older than you but smarter than you.
yeah? show your face then coward.

>>510809136
>atheism is merely the lack of belief in a gods!
Please provide evidence for this claim. The burden of proof is on you.

>>510810499
How many other men do you have on your hard drive there faggot?

>>510810524
>Please provide evidence for this claim

>>510806144 (OP)
Now now anon, you know atheists will only show up in threads where they get to play offense and deflect and derail, they have never been able to fight their way off the ropes once you put em there so expect this thread to die with less than 100 replies because they are too big a pussy to confront statistics and reality.

>>510810650
>appeal to dictionary fallacy
Try again. We don't accept fallacies in this rational skeptic community, stupid christard.

>>510810764
>they have never been able to fight their way off the ropes once
You must be new here.

>>510810499

>>510810499
Can you skank for us?

>>510810821
>words don't have meanings!
You're an idiot.

>>510810847
I've been here ten years
You still haven't confronted the OPs statistic.

>>510810885
Whom are you quoting? Are you mentally ill? Still waiting for better evidence than the Appeal to Dictionary fallacy.
>https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Definition
>Using a dictionary’s limited definition of a term as evidence that term cannot have another meaning, expanded meaning, or even conflicting meaning. This is a fallacy because dictionaries don’t reason; they simply are a reflection of an abbreviated version of the current accepted usage of a term, as determined by argumentation and eventual acceptance. In short, dictionaries tell you what a word meant, according to the authors, at the time of its writing, not what it meant before that time, after, or what it should mean.

>>510810885
In fact, going by your one line (you) farming non argument bait responses
I would say you are that tattooed fat boy that believes pedophilia is ok so long as two "consenting adults" both agree to rape their adopted boy together.
Now post one of your pics of some fag wearing a priest outfit they bought at spirit Halloween store :)

>>510810929
>I've been here ten years
Nope
>>510810929
>You still haven't confronted the OPs statistic
Why do I need too? It's the most obvious shit ever. Lol. It also has nothing to do with me.

>>510811018
>Whom are you quoting?
You, the retard.

>>510811047
>that believes pedophilia is ok so long as two "consenting adults" both agree to rape their adopted boy together.
Sounds like something you made up. Why would you do that?

>>510811107
Ok, so you have literal psychosis. No wonder you believe in magical Big Bunga nothing-explosions that happen suddenly for no reason and create everything.

>>510811083
>Why do I need too?
it's your duty as an atheist to defend atheism at all times.
always remember the mantra:
>atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods
>atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods

>>510811083
>Nope
Ah yes, your go to wen you have no argument
LMAO it's the fat boy!
Ghost of mesa troll lmao

>>510811457
>retard says retard shit.
Ok retard

>>510811513
>it's your duty as an atheist to defend atheism
Not really. Atheism is just an opinion about a question. That's it.

I know you goons want to desperately make it into something else. But you fail. Everytime

>>510811638
>Atheism is just an opinion
But you said it's just a lack of belief. Now it's an opinion?

>>510811585
I dknt need an argument. You morons defeat yourself.

>maybe if I keep posting this picture it will make him go away!

It won't

>>510811675
This idiot doesn't understand nuance.

>>510809476
Atheists are mostly gay as almost everyone in our western society but christians are no better. As a christian you have to be pro open borders and love foreigners. Especially as a le based tradcath.

>>510811751
Is it a lack of belief or an opinion? Also, where's the evidence for your claim?

>>510810821
>appeal to dictionary fallacy
The dumbest post I've read this morning after
>>510807777

>>510811840
He has nothing, he will shit up entire thread without ever making a single point

>>510811840
why do you believe in God?

>>510811822
>As a Christian you have to [...] love foreigners
yeah, and i can do that from afar.
>As a Christian you have to be pro open borders
hell no i don't.

>>510811840
Since this child needs a coloring book


If someone says their favorite flavor of god is real. I say I lack belief in that.

Can you connect the dots you low IQ moron?

>>510811877
>https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Definition

>Using a dictionary’s limited definition of a term as evidence that term cannot have another meaning, expanded meaning, or even conflicting meaning. This is a fallacy because dictionaries don’t reason; they simply are a reflection of an abbreviated version of the current accepted usage of a term, as determined by argumentation and eventual acceptance. In short, dictionaries tell you what a word meant, according to the authors, at the time of its writing, not what it meant before that time, after, or what it should mean.

Seethe more and keep committing fallacies. You will never be a real rational skeptic banana sodomy chad.

>>510811946
Is atheism a lack of belief or an opinion?

>>510811887
>He has nothing
Other way around. I've destroyed you so much that you can't approach within anything but insults hahaha

>>510811822
>You have to be pro open borders
This argument might work on an east German
But it doesn't work here

>>510807527
This. Ideal system is a white bull man in charge for 4 wives 3 femboys, and a gay nigger buck.

>>510811948
Look at you, appealing to a definition

Hahahaha

>>510811980
>can't connect the dots.
Lol

>>510807875
The belief that there isn’t something is a belief in itself. Science is your “god,” Faggots like degrasse tyson are your “preachers” and the devil and his band of kikes are your masters.

>>510811910
not the guy you asked,
but for me it was a live hypothesis (nothing invalidates it) that had better explanatory power over the human experience (it provides grounding for meaning, purpose, the truth value of moral claims) than other views like naturalism/materialism, and i hold to doxastic voluntarism rather than the view that we're all meat robots and can't choose what to believe, and decided to believe it.

>>510811997
Every single group in that list that supports that at a rate greater than 50% has praying for Israel as a foundational doctrine. Baptists are effectively kikes.

>>510812101
That's cool bro. Whatever works for you

>>510811910
>why do you believe in God?
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

>>510812120
>B-but Adam Greenberg told me
Lol you coping tryhards always try to counter facts with anecdotal fallacies

>>510811948
China is an atheist country and banned LGBT.
Some east Asians are atheists and never followed Christians morals to have 180'd on homosexuals..
is that something you can understand?

>>510812256
>he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs.
See
>>510812147
So that's not true

>>510812018
>>510812055
Is atheism a lack of belief or an opinion? You said it's one, then you said it's the other. I'm very confused. ;^(

>>510812067
>The belief that there isn’t something is a belief in itself.
i agree mostly.
they'd carefully frame it as
>it's not that i hold a belief, it's that i don't feel i have enough evidence to warrant belief in your proposition
so that they don't have to defend their view,
but this is still a propositional attitude, a mental state, and what people typically mean by "belief" in the context of epistemology.

>>510811980
Atheism is a lack of belief in god based off an opinion.

Similar to Christians worshiping a jewish guys cock based off their opinion.

Agnostic Chads see no evidence for either and largely rule out neither. I do however rule out jewish gods.

>>510807527
Marriage is objectively one sided to benefit the woman. Women have disproportionate control of government (over 50% voting are women) and leading private industry atm (make up over 50% of employed). Once ypu are married, you are locked in as a half slave to the woman forever by law, else lose half of what you had to actually work for (vs women get things by being existing). Then once you have kids, you become full slave and indebted to work for boss goysteinberg till death. And that best case scenerio, in reality this entire process will include having to watch your wife be a slave to her boss as well.

>>510812270
>muh china
>muh LGBT
You seem to have a psychotic illness. I was just rubbing your nose in some page from the atheist bible about why you shouldn't make appeals to the dictionary.

>>510812422
>thread starts with gay stats
>east Asia being atheist, anti-lgbt, and prosperous
cope.
words have meanings.

>>510812257
Ok, so why do they pray for Israel and all their churches send their pastors to go touch the wall? How many young southern baptists actually are in leadership in those organizations? Obviously I am not going to even bother with discussing the idea of being a Baptist, and being 100% going to hell just like an atheist, but still explain?

>>510812303
>So that's not true
What isn't?

>>510812313
>retard can't into nuance
You're too dumb for these conversations

>>510812422
They always go for the china defense hoping you won't look beyond their arbitrary framing.
but if you look beyond the surface china is an absolutely failed state that is without any soul

>>510812394
marriage is against the bible

>>510812676
it's good to question yourself like this, especially if your worldview is as worthless and nihilistic as atheist materialism.

>>510812386
>so that they don't have to defend their view,
It doesn't need to be defended. Lol.

It's a disbelief or lack of belief in God or gods. Saying it's still a belief is irrelevant because whether I say I believe God doesn't exist is still lack of belief.

Why are you this dumb?

>>510812788
So again, what's not true about what the other anon said?

>>510812788
>atheist materialism.
Oh hey it's the ASSMAD and SEETHING guy lmao

>>510812743
>They always go for the china defense
And yet they won't just immigrate to China where their godless bugman ilk dominates. Curious!

>>510812805
>doesn't need to be defended.
>26 posts contradicting this statement
Lol

>>510812745
Source?

>>510812846
Kek nvm
>>510812945
>I've been dunked on 26 times
Lmao

>>510807875
Atheism is just spiritual cuckoldry that's a symptom of societal collapse.

>>510812846
i don't know, i wasn't following the conversation, just saw you talking to yourself and thought it was funny.

>>510813003
You've been dunked on 109 times by 109 different flags.

>>510813031
>uses spiritually as an insult
It's like you know how bullshit it is

>>510813063
>just saw you talking to yourself and thought it was funny.
Me too :^)

>>510813082
Nope. Lol

>>510813031
yeah.

>>510807527
Inshallah brother the ummah will grow

>>510812963
the bible

>>510812016
BASED
A
S
E
D

>>510806144 (OP)
That 4% is small but the most based group of people on Earth

The 94% there are this

>>510813200
God:
>He answered, “Have you not read that from the beginning the Creator made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and will be united with his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” (Matthew 19:4)

Paul:
>Now with regard to the issues you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” (1 Cor 7:1)
oh wait, he's not done
>But because of immoralities, each man should have relations with his own wife and each woman with her own husband. A husband should fulfill his marital responsibility to his wife, and likewise a wife to her husband. It is not the wife who has the rights to her own body, but the husband. In the same way, it is not the husband who has the rights to his own body, but the wife. (1 Cor 7:2-4)

>>510806144 (OP)
Still more evolved than Jew worshipers.

>>510813354
>quoting fan fiction
I'm jewish

The funny part is when the last moron claimed its a historical fact that Jesus rose from the dead but could never give the non Christian sources for that.

Nor has any historian ever claimed the mass dead rising either

>>510813283
why should homosexuality be discouraged in a godless universe without inherent meaning?

>>510813854
Because it spreads more disease than any other group. Its also damaging to population growth.

Pretty simple really
.

I understand your God is your inherent meaning. But it's not needed by everyone

>>510807875
>nooooo you must vote for my candidate that worships Jews and Israel!

>>510806144 (OP)

>>510813973
>nooooo you must breed, you just must, okay?!

>>510814126
Doesn't matter to me if you do or don't

>>510813973
how does it prevent population growth though

>>510813973
if the universe has no inherent meaning, why prioritize disease prevention as an objective moral imperative?
if life has no inherent purpose, why is population growth inherently valuable?
fertility collapse is a real and present threat to the globe right now, but homosexuality isn't a driver.
even if every homosexual were forced into normal heterosexual relationships, birth rates in low-fertility societies wouldn't meaningfully rebound (see south korea's 0.7 TFR despite anti-gay policies)

in a godless framework, your objections reduce to personal preferences (i value biological reproduction) but without inherent purpose, that's no more valid that someone valuing happiness, pleasure, diversity, or sexual deviancy over raw population numbers.

>>510812909
>this butt blasted about a counterexample
keep coping

>>510813354
> your body is your wifes
Literal slavery.

>>510814301
their diseases also mostly only affect other homosexuals so it's basically a non issue

>>510806144 (OP)

>>510814262
I didn't realize gays can make babies

>>510814301
>if the universe has no inherent meaning
Why dies the universe need inherent meaning when I find inherent meaning in my life?

>>510814381
that's my fetish

>>510814301
>your objections reduce to personal preferences
Everyone has personal preferences..it's why you choose the God you believe in

>>510813973
Feminism is the primary cause of population collapse. Homosexuality is insignificant.

>>510812743
That's good for them. Imagine how much it would suck to hear someone speaking Chinese in your head all the time.

>>510814492
I can believe that

>>510806144 (OP)
how is support for british men relevant to domiciles?

>>510814414
you realize who makes babies?
women
and the amount of women stays the same so you're just a virgin coping loser

>>510814414
it wouldn't be "inherent" for one, your meaning would be self-made, subjective rather than woven into the fabric of reality.
for two, from the atheist materialist worldview, you don't need to find meaning or do anything else, because nothing ultimately matters.
you're just being sort of hypocritical and arbitrary for telling other people how they ought to live, pretending like there's a real right or a real wrong outside of social convention when there couldn't be.

>>510814601
>you realize who makes babies?
>women
And a man. Kek

>>510814489
>Everyone has personal preferences..it's why you choose the God you believe in
could it not be that i chose my particular brand of theism because that's where i believed the evidence led me?

>>510814641
>it wouldn't be "inherent" for one,
Empathy is exactly that.
>from the atheist materialist worldview
You really are that idiot from yesterday lol

>>510814742
So personal feelings. Like I said. Thanks for confirming

>>510806144 (OP)

You know what they say, mutations take millions of years to happen

>>510814641
>you're just being sort of hypocritical and arbitrary for telling other people how they ought to live
I've done no such thing. That's you actually.

>>510814714
a single man can make 100 woman pregnant in 1 mont nigger

>>510814414
>I find inherent meaning in my life
>inherent meaning
>inherent
Where does life (or anything at all) get its "inherent" meaning from under atheism?

>>510814908
Thanks for pricing my point :^)

>>510814945
Empathy.

Have a nice day dumb dumb

>>510814945
I get meaning from my hatred of jeets.

>>510814999
men aren't a limitation for reproduction nigger

>>510815039
>Empathy.
Empathy is subjective. Try again.

>>510814945
self growth?
morals?
empathy?

>religicucks have no arguments against atheism so they resort to calling them poopyheads
why is it always like this bros?

>>510815285
religion is subjective

>>510815287
>self growth?
>empathy?
Subjective therefore not inherent.

>morals?
That's just another thing that remains without a solid basis under atheism.

>>510815207
Thanks for agreeing again lol

>>510815285
Nope. But I do apply it subjectively

>>510814301
>if life has no inherent purpose, why is population growth inherently valuable?
the reason why there's a faction of elites fretting about birth rates is because of the financial system, national debt, and retirement accounts.
it's reasonable for there to be people who abstain from having children, just as there are theists who have sworn celibacy for spiritual reasons or religious roles.

>>510815323
You can screech that but it doesn't make your claims any more coherent.

>>510814821
>Empathy is exactly that.
empathy is a powerful gift from God, no doubt. but saying it's "inherent meaning" is nonsense.
empathy is a behavior rooted in emotional resonance and evolved social instincts, not an objective truth embedded in the fabric of the cosmos.
it's a product of minds in a physical system, shaped by neurons and culture, so its significance is self-made or decided on by convention, not universal or metaphysically inherent.
you can choose to elevate it, live by it, and base your meaning on it, but doing so just reflects personal or cultural values rather than cosmic absolutes.
>So personal feelings. Like I said.
no, what i meant was that my belief isn't merely a matter of preference or emotional comfort, but rather a conclusion i reached through careful study, reflection and weighing of evidence. just as someone might choose a scientific theory because they find it compellingly supported by data, i found certain theological claims far more convincing than others.
>>510814859
no, it makes sense in my worldview as there are real mind-independent moral duties values and obligations to point to rather than my own person feefees about ethics.

>>510815384
I accept your concession. ID goes to the filter now. Thanks for playing.

>>510815375
Empathy is the solid base. Even children understand it at an early age without any coercion

>>510815375
even simply doing whatever gives me a dopamine release is worth in life nigger

>>510815384
cope harder nigger it's not my fault you can't get laid

>>510815433
>empathy is a powerful gift from God
You're welcome to believe that.
>>510815433
>but saying it's "inherent meaning" is nonsense.
Nah. To you it is. But you never raised kids. So you don't understand how children understand it at an early age

>>510815433
>>So personal feelings. Like I said.
>no
Yup. Even detailed it as such
>>510814742
>I
>my
>me
All personal

>>510815493
>even simply doing whatever gives me a dopamine release is worth in life
I didn't ask you what you subjectively think is "worth in life". I asked some mouth-breathing retard where life gets its "inherent meaning" from under atheism.

>>510815487
i see people use this line of thinking a lot, but kids were assholes when i was growing up.
i remember a classmate of mine in elementary school put a firecracker up a frog's ass.

not saying all kids are demonic, just saying they're not angels like this bizarre argument would necessitate to be meaningful.

>>510815464
Whatever cope helps you get by

>>510815493
>cope harder nigger it's not my fault you can't get laid
I married with kids bud.

>>510815295
if churches lose members, they eventually close and the ministry has to get real jobs.
so attacking atheists is one strategy they try to stave off closure.

>>510815660
dopamine release NIGGER

>>510813105
Get out of my country you disgusting ESL pajeet

>>510815683
>but kids were assholes when i was growing up.
Sounds like a problem with the parents

>>510815734
I like how every atheist ITT is 80 IQ. How did atheism become the new religion for retards? They used to be midwits.

>>510815802
dopamine is also what brings happiness to religious retards RETARD

>>510815802
This is coming from the clown who can't into nuance

>>510815646
>nuh uh
>nuh uh
>nuh uh
thanks, phoneposter.
stellar argumentation.

>But you never raised kids.
you're right, i haven't been blessed with kids yet. we can't all be pussy slayers like this guy >>510811585

>>510815851
>dopamine is also what brings happiness to religious retards RETARD
80 IQ and also psychosis. I didn't ask you anything about what brings happiness to you or to religious people. You were defending some statement about life having a certain "inherent" quality. To say that it's "inherent" implies that it has that quality independently of your relationship to it. You then went on to justify this claim in entirely relative terms. This is incoherent. Try again.

>>510815955
>thanks, phoneposter
You're welcome.. it's easy when I'm dealing with your personal feelings..like I said do whatever works for you ma'am

>>510815955
>>But you never raised kids.
>you're right
And you never will

>>510807875
Yeah it turns out when your politics aren't informed by a religion you're probably not going to vote in accordance to that religion's arbitrary rules and instead vote based on weather or not something affects you personally enough to care about, which leads to similar voting patterns

>>510816227
you're evil.

>>510816083
>To say that it's "inherent" implies that it has that quality independently of your relationship to it
Which empathy has

>>510816083
yeah the goal of life is to feel happiness
happiness is a chemical reaction IDIOT

>>510806144 (OP)
kek

>>510815693
and I'm gay and I bet I'm happier than you

>>510814301
>fertility collapse is a real and present threat to the globe right now
not really. It's just a threat to muh modern jewish economy and muh retirement funds. The real threat to the globe is an abundance of niggers

>>510816314
Very nebulous of you

>>510816380
OK :^)

>>510806144 (OP)
>random chart
>LOOK, LOOK HOW BAD THEY ARE, PRAISE THE JEW RABBI RIGHT NOW!

>>510816340
Like I said... literal 80 IQ. You can't even grasp what's being talked about. ID goes to the filter.

>>510816583
>You can't even grasp what's being talked about.
Kek the irony

>>510816285
>instead vote based on weather or not something affects you personally
this is an absolute dogshit frame of mind as a citizen within a democracy.
>don't like abortion? don't have an abortion.
>don't like slavery? don't have a slave.

>>510816522
whites literally killed jesus too

>>510816522
>here's why atheism is gay
>b-but Christianity though!! right guys??
pathetic

REMINDER: ATHEISM HAS A SUICIDE SOLUTION.

These people find so much "inherent" meaning in life they -ack themselves.

>>510816774
>here's a random chart proving I'm right
denounce all abrahamic religions right now, goy

>>510816799
>These people find so much "inherent" meaning in life they -ack themselves
Not a problem for me

>>510806144 (OP)
No, we won't.

>>510816424
I'm happy you're happy anon
I just don't think you're so happy since you want to destroy others lifestyles which don't affect you

>>510816799
>slave your whole life
>trust the death cult
>two more millenia

>>510816956
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

>>510816956
whites killed jesus

>>510816939
>I'm happy you're happy anon
Cool. Have a nice weekend :^)

>>510816939
>since you want to destroy others lifestyles which don't affect you
Hmm where did you get that from?

>>510817039
I will have a lot of gay sex thank you very much

>>510816956
And in the end the only truth is what the jew schools teach you about hating your ancestors.
Looks like you can't have it both ways.
If it was yiddish, why did they get rid of it?

>>510817079
you want to get rid of gays?

>>510817081
Cool. Whatever works for you

>>510816939
i don't think he actually does, especially given the data in OP's chart.
i think he just doesn't want Christians to be able to use atheism's acceptance of homosexuality as a bludgeon against atheism on /pol/, because atheism is the most important thing in his life, it's what defines him as a human being and any perceived sleight against it is a vile blasphemy that he absolutely needs to shut down by any means necessary.

>>510817121
No?

>>510817155
ok thanks
being gay is perfectly fine

>>510816988
>he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs
but shoing a random chart and going "LOOOK ATHEISTS GAIS" is a totally valid argument

>>510817140
>i think he just doesn't want Christians to be able to use atheism's acceptance of homosexuality as a bludgeon against atheism on /pol/
Why would you. It has nothing to do with atheism or me lol.

It's a red herring>>510817140
>because atheism is the most important thing in his life
Incorrect

I see I've hurt your feelings so much that you begin to act like a woman hahaha

>>510817195
Doesn't bother me 2hat consenting adults do, as long as it doesn't hurt others

>>510817198
Both points stand unchallenged.

>>510817309
isn't that the same standard for everything though
also religion says it's bad

>>510817436
>isn't that the same standard for everything though
I mean it should be
>>510817436
>also religion says it's bad
Do you really care? I don't lol

>>510817140
>atheism's acceptance of homosexuality as a bludgeon against atheism on /pol/
atheists don't worship any gods. That's all there is to atheism. Yes, it's that simple.

>>510817541
I don't care about religion you're right
also whites killed jesus

>>510817574
>That's all there is to atheism
Evidence for this claim?

>>510817574
>atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods
>atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods
>atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods

>>510817627
>also whites killed jesus
Like the Romans?

>>510817722
yes
jesus died to a Roman with a spear

>>510817702
We only need to say it once. You goons keep bringing it up, unable to refute it

>>510817767
I agree. If Jesus existed in the first place

>>510817409
>no argument
>>510817702
>>510817634
oh, what does it mean then?

>>510807527
Race is spirit.

>>510817634
>Evidence for this claim?
The lack of belief in God or gods

>>510817830
>what does it mean then?
A constellation of beliefs associated with the Atheist Movement.

>>510818008
>A constellation of beliefs
You mean the ones you strawman.

>>510806144 (OP)
They are simply out of touch

>>510818008
>A constellation of beliefs
such as?
no wait, let me guess: "ATHEISTS ARE GAIS"

>>510817830
>oh, what does it mean then?
depends on the context and how it's qualified implicitly or contextually
in some senses, it's
>a voter bloc
>a belief >>510812386
>a literal religion with its own churches, monuments in front of federal courthouses detailing statements of beliefs (pic), debaptism rites and ceremonies featuring hairdryers, its own symbology, its own leaders
>a worldview
>an ideology

>>510818200
So many things you clowns try to pigeon hole it into. It doesn't work though

>>510818166
Go watch some Banana Sodomite or Mike Dillahunty or Richard Dawkins or browse reddit and you'll get idea.

>>510818166
opposition of one religion while claiming to be against all while watching another religion conquer them and doing nothing about it and coping that you totally will once they completely take over

>>510817702
>christniggress is struggling to understand atheism
kek

>>510818367
kek roflmfao what's your argument though honk?

>>510818328
christians are the ones who insist on helping kikes though

>>510818430
Thay you don't understand atheism.
You really this dumb?

>>510818294
>nuh uh
stellar rebuttal.

>>510818526
Its funny you accuse me of what you do. Lol

>>510818497
i wasn't talking to you.
and "nuh uh" isn't an argument.
how the fuck can you be fat in arizona anyway?
isn't it like 130º there?

Why are there people out there so butthurt at atheists for arriving at the obvious logical conclusion? Every day these sophist threads are posted

>>510807875
trvke. gaytheists are ALL nigger loving faggots

>>510818570
show me one time i handwaved an actual argument without providing an explanation in this thread.
just one.

>>510818200
>a literal religion
>non-stamp collector
>>510818323
>seething goystian starts shitflinging the moment he has no argument
>>510818328
>why are you predominantly against the religion that is predominantly present where you live
I spit on all abrahamic religions

>>510818707
and christcucks are kike lovers

>>510818742
You sound like you're losing your mind with rage. I gave you a good sample of the relevant ideas and their representatives as embraced by the Atheist Movement itself.

>>510818619
>i wasn't talking to you.
You're in a public forum bud.
>>510818619
>and "nuh uh" isn't an argument
Neither is your strawman of atheism
>>510818619
>how the fuck can you be fat in arizona anyway?
I'm not. Are you?

>>510818739
>>510816314
Lol baby bitch

>>510818831
you sound like you want me to believe I'm mad, why is some random movement supposed to represent me? I don't believe in religions, I have no interest in some faggy movement.

>>510818833
isn't this you? >>510811585
i'd say you're 5'4", BMI of 27

>>510818831
atheism isn't a belief so there isn't a movement of it
just people coopting it for their own good

>>510818739
Here's another
>>510817702
Lol. You don't have any arguments really

>>510818904
>i'd say you're 5'4", BMI of 27
Try 6'2 and 215lbs. :^)

Here I am after bulking. About 245lbs

>>510818902
>why is some random movement supposed to represent me?
Because you embrace its label and regurgitate its talking points.

>>510819040
>Because you embrace its label
where
>regurgitate its talking points.
like what? show me the source too, you can't claim they say shit without source.

>>510819040
atheism isn't a club and it doesn't have rules

>>510819011
that's interesting I'm also 6'2" and 215, but I don't have nearly the amount of gut you do
you're frauding something

>>510819117
>like what?
Like the "atheism is a lack of belief" nonsense. It's one of their most popular talking points.

>>510819166
>that's interesting I'm also 6'2" and 215,
Not really. Lol
>but your gut.
This idiot can't read
>>510819011
>Here I am after bulking. About 245lbs

>>510818877
alright, i'll address the arguments you made here.
>it's easy when I'm dealing with your personal feelings..like I said do whatever works for you ma'am
this is not an argument.
>you'll never have kids
this is also not an argument.
>>510818932
the post i was replying to was saying "atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods" and i said "atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods"
it wasn't a handwave, it was an echoing.
>>510819011
is this the pic you use to catfish men on grindr you fucking sodomite?

>>510819145
>i-i-i-it's not a club
>regurgitates the club's standard talking point

>>510819282
atheism doesn't have any rules of what other things you can believe or not

>>510819334
yeah there isn't an atheist book telling you what to believe

>>510819321
>alright, i'll address the arguments you made here
No you won't watch
>>510819321
>it wasn't a handwave, it was an echoing
So you can't refute it is what you're saying .
>>510819321
>is this the pic you use to catfish men on grindr you fucking sodomite?
Kek he likes me. You're s fag hahaha

>>510819321
A-theism means without (a-) belief in gods (-theism) yes.
You made 40 posts itt without ever attempting to make an argument. Sad!

>>510819339
>atheism doesn't have any rules
Atheism is a constellation of beliefs.

>>510819282
>Like the "atheism is a lack of belief" nonsense
>what does 2+2 equal? DON'T GIVE ME 4
abrahamists, as disingenous as ever

>>510819585
cool
show me the source material then

>>510819553
>A-theism means without (a-) belief in gods (-theism) yes.
Provide evidence for your claim.

>>510806144 (OP)
Reminder there can be no morality without a moral lawgiver, atheists can't even prove lying is wrong.

>>510819282
>Like the "atheism is a lack of belief" nonsense
>what does 2+2 equal? DON'T GIVE ME 4
abrahamists, as disingenuous as ever

>>510819429
>So you can't refute it is what you're saying .
no, i addressed the argument that "atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods"
here: >>510812386 and here: >>510818200
were my arguments compelling?
irrelevant. my point was that you just say "nuh uh" like rebbit downvotes to arguments people make that attack your religion instead of even attempting to provide rationalization for your views that are counter to the arguments being put forth.
>>510819553
check the 4th line in this post

>>510819339
Atheism is the belief everything was created BY nothing. That "nothing" was the creative force that created everything, which is a scientific impossibility and obviously absurd.

>>510819618
Wow. You are a massive moron

>>510819678
The're all kikes anyway

>>510819751
>nuh uh

>>510819635
>what is empathy

>>510819748
see >>510819610

>>510819731
>i addressed the argument
Not really no. You make up more strawman.

>>510819813
see >>510815433

>>510819805
This idiot doesn't understand stand Greek. It's ok, you are a moron after all

>>510819833
>nuh uh
demonstrate how either of those posts were strawmen.

>>510819618
Open a dictionary, retard.
>>510819635
Both atheists and theists have situations where they would lie. The assertion that theists don't lie is a straight up lie. Your point is self-refuting and hilarious.

>>510816799
When you don't have insanity to fall back on.

>>510819906
>demonstrate how either of those posts were strawmen
It had nothing to do with atheism. Simple as

>>510819748
God came from nothing.

>>510819955
demonstrate how.

>>510820012
I already have. >>510812805
>It's a disbelief or lack of belief in God or gods. Saying it's still a belief is irrelevant because whether I say I believe God doesn't exist is still lack of belief.
And as for this post
>>510818200
Has nothing to do with atheism.

>>510819839
>empathy was given by GAWD
nice argument there

>>510819588
>>510819610
Concession accepted. You also almost certainly hold more than one of the following beliefs:
- Theism is irrational
- Atheism is a net benefit for society
- Public schooling is a net benefit for society
- The French Revolution was a good thing
- Materialism is true
- Consciousness is generated by the brain
- The Big Bang is real
- Science is the best way to understand reality
- Random mutation and natural selection are enough to explain all life on the planet
- Peer review is a good system

>>510819748
This is a moron

>almost 80 fucking posts by ONE fedora tipper
Holy fuck this nigger is SEETHING

>>510819980
God is timeless, He didn't "come from" anything.
>they why can't the universe be timeless
because it's contingent rather than necessary
>why can't the universe be necessary?
because it doesn't possess the qualities of a metaphysically necessary being: it changes, decays, and depends on prior states for its existence. a necesary entity by definition would have to eixst in all possible worlds independent of conditions or causes. the universe (space/time) as we observe it is bound by time space and physical laws, which all suggest contingency rather than necessity

>>510819926
>appeal to dictionary fallacy
Isn't it weird how all of you repeat exactly the same fallacious talking point and then try to back it up with the exact same fallacious argument, even though supposedly all you have in common is "lack of belief in God"?

>>510819980
God is eternal and didn't come from nor created by anything but has always been. Our universe on the other hand is a creation, which is why the second law of thermodynamics is a thing

>>510820116
>You also almost certainly hold more than one of the following beliefs:
When your argument hinges on a strawman, you have nothing and you are dumb

>>510819731
Not an argument, you're just rambling and attacking people personally. It's quite ridiculous that you make dozens of posts while saying nothing at all and still think you are in the right.
>>510819618
Open a dictionary lmao
godtards not sending their best, who is going to put up a fight and present an actual argument?

>>510806144 (OP)
>white atheists
China doesn't
>>510809476
Chinese don't

There are literally 4 christians fudgepackers for every 1 atheist fudgepacker. You can cope and say "yeah, cause there's more christians." Sure, valid, but there are ~2.3 billion christians globally and ~1.2 billion atheists so even if you balance those numbers you still get almost 2 christian gays for every atheist gay.

China is 91% atheist and they hate fags more than western christcucks do. Atheists in the west are faggots because they are westernized. The final redpill is that the US ans Europe are just innately pro-faggot, regardless of belief system. Hail China and death to the faggot loving west.

>>510820235
>appeal to dictionary fallacy
Isn't it weird how all of you repeat exactly the same fallacious talking point and then try to back it up with the exact same fallacious argument, even though supposedly all you have in common is "lack of belief in God"?


>godtards not sending their best,
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

>>510820197
>you can't use words that's a dictionary fallacy
lmao what a retard
That's all you have, circlejerk about definitions and semantics instead of having a real conversation. Pathetic!

>>510820200
You're welcome to your personal feelings and opinions

>>510820243
>There are literally 4 christians fudgepackers for every 1 atheist fudgepacker.
>80% of gays are christian
nah, i don't believe you.
let's see some numbers.

>>510820116
>I win, look at all these strawmen I made up
embarassing, you can't even understand the definition of atheism

>>510820410
>nah, i don't believe you
Kek this goon thinks Christians are honest and truthful and don't hide in a closet

>>510820097
>Saying it's still a belief is irrelevant
then what's your problem with me saying it's a belief?
>Has nothing to do with atheism.
that's the president of american atheism david silverman sitting at the atheist monument in front of a courthouse.

you're conflating all uses of the term "atheism" to mean one definition of the term

>>510806144 (OP)
>>510807875
>>510809136
>>510810031
>meanwhile

>>510820433
How many of those statements apply to you?

You will concede my point by refusing to answer.

>>510820343
Religious people are more likely to use exclamation marks. Did you know that?
From now on whenever someone uses the word "theist" in a conversation I'm simply going to ignore what 99,9999% of mankind agrees is the meaning of this word and act as if we're talking about excessive exclamation mark users.

>>510820531
>Larpagans exist
>But NOT LARPSTIANS
Make it make sense

>>510820200
You have zero understanding of what a scientific law is.

>>510820235
>>510820603
>appeal to dictionary fallacy
Isn't it weird how all of you repeat exactly the same fallacious talking point and then try to back it up with the exact same fallacious argument, even though supposedly all you have in common is "lack of belief in God"?

>godtards not sending their best,
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

https://www.cato.org/public-opinion-brief/religious-trump-voters-how-faith-moderates-attitudes-about-immigration-race#attitudes-toward-racial-minorities

>>510820626
>can't debunk my claim
>"You...you don't understand science!!"
nigger, put up an argument or shut up faggot

>>510820521
>atheist makes some sort of gay monument
>AIIIEEE HELP ME YAHWEH (has a church every 2 blocks)
>>510820592
>I win because I'm applying these strawmen to you
again, embarrassing

>>510818328
>strawman inside some schizo’s head

>>510820626
He BTFO'd you. Your position is incoherent.

>>510820667
>>510817198

Why do christcucks post these statistics as if they don't know asking a western atheist their opinion isn't bad sampling?
There's more atheists in China then there are Americans, not American christans, not atheists, not atheists and christians put together, Americans in general. Guess which country lets you marry fags? Japan and Taiwan literally made gay marriage legal just because they want the USA to like them more and defend them from China. One of China's primary motives in reclaiming Taiwan is rebanning faggot marriage.

>>510820817
Notice how I correctly predicted your refusal to answer the question. Obviously, most of those statements apply. I can make a whole list of statements about you with 80%+ certainty just based on your identification with the atheist label, therefore atheism is NOT just a "lack of belief in god". This statement is an empirically demonstrable truth.

>>510821007
>There's more atheists in China
There are no atheists in China.

>>510820667
>Isn't it weird how everyone thinks I'm a retard that disrespects the agreed upon USE OF LANGUAGE as a way to transmit information between minds?
No, it's not weird. It's just that you are a retarded sophist and everyone else agrees on the purpose of language instead of redefining every word.
You are aware that I can use the same retardation on you and redefine every word you're using to mean something else, right? You're barely worth talking to desu

>>510820817
>atheist makes some sort of gay monument
>AIIIEEE HELP ME YAHWEH (has a church every 2 blocks)
my argument wasn't "the religion of atheism has too many monuments" it was atheism can be classed as a religion in some senses and one of many reasons i specified was that it has religious monuments outside of federal courthouses with the atheist logo on it detailing an atheist's statement of beliefs.

>>510807875
I don't vote in fact I'm gathering a collection of voter cards so when I'm about to die, I can put it all in my bed and die on them. Not that voting changes anything anyway

>>510820795
Your personal feelings and opinions about God isn't an argument

>>510821009
>give me the answer i want or I win
>WHAT IS 2+2 NO DON'T GIVE ME 4 GIVE ME ANOTHER ANSWER
>This statement is an empirically demonstrable truth.
>can't prove shit and only throws strawmen around
let me guess, you're going to strawman some more

>>510821009
Look, we can all point out christ fags whenever they have self righteous, hypocritical, liars who normally use the bible to make any argument. But that doesn’t actually classify you as a christian, does it, disingenuous bible thumping faggot?

>>510820235
>>510820603
>>510821096
>appeal to dictionary fallacy
Isn't it weird how all of you repeat exactly the same fallacious talking point and then try to back it up with the exact same fallacious argument, even though supposedly all you have in common is "lack of belief in God"?

>godtards not sending their best,
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

>>510821135
>>atheist makes some sort of gay monument
Prove its only limited to atheist.

You won't be able too

>>510821170
>we can all point out christ fags ...
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

>>510820531

>>510821209
>Prove its only limited to atheist.
it's not.
plenty of other religions have monuments outside of federal courthouses too.

>>510821192
>Isn't it weird how all of you repeat exactly the same fallacious talking point
Like how you appeal to the dictionary definition of the fallacy you quote.

>>510821166
Notice how I correctly predicted your refusal to answer the question. Obviously, most of those statements apply. I can make a whole list of statements about you with 80%+ certainty just based on your identification with the atheist label, therefore atheism is NOT just a "lack of belief in god". This statement is an empirically demonstrable truth.

>>510820621
>>510820682
Cool info, thanks anon

>>510821140
You are a butthurt faggot who loves your sin that's why you deny the most obvious and simple truth of Creation, atheists aren't serious people

>>510821273
>>Prove its only limited to atheist.
>it's not.
Ah so you're not arguing against atheism but someone's personal preference.

Thats what I thought

>>510821294
Racist Christians don't exist.

>>510821321
This isn't an argument either ma'am

>>510821229
Your post is basically
>90% of atheists are faggots
>therefore atheism is about faggots

While you’re crying that someone disingenuously misrepresents your stance and changes the meaning of your belief. Faggot

>>510821170
>>510821394
>disingenuous bible thumping faggot
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

Whoever is behind the moldovan guy's account you need to upgrade your gpt this was kinda boring

>>510821394
These people have zero introspection

>>510821135
>retards make an irrelevant monument
>SEEE ATHEISTS HAVE BELIEFS
so? you can have beliefs without believing in a god
>>510821278
>copypaste respones
peak abrahamist intellectual

>>510820235
>>510820603
>>510821096
>>510821451
>appeal to dictionary fallacy
Isn't it weird how all of you repeat exactly the same fallacious talking point and then try to back it up with the exact same fallacious argument, even though supposedly all you have in common is "lack of belief in God"?

>godtards not sending their best,
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

>>510821446
>bible faggot cries

Defend yourself, you disingenuous faggot. If your belief is worth a shit, you wouldn’t need these pathetic emotional pleading.

>>510821454
>peak abrahamist intellectual
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

>>510820116
> Theism is irrational
Very much depends on the specific type of theism, believe in Jewish desert fiction is irrational, other religions might be better.
> Atheism is a net benefit for society
Its more complex that just saying Atheism/Worse. Christianity, mediocre as it was, provided some useful function in maintaining society. The problem with the rise of Atheism is due to the ideological vacuum.
> Public schooling is a net benefit for society
School is child abuse.
> Consciousness is generated by the brain
There is zero evidence that consciousness exists. But in regards to observable behaviors, there is no evidence of this coming from anywhere other than the brain.
> The Big Bang is real
I lack sufficient qualifications to refute it, but it seems plausible and I have not been presented with any competing theories.
> Science is the best way to understand reality
Science is a formal process by which we can describe and model observable reality.
> Random mutation and natural selection are enough to explain all life on the planet
Its plausible, genetic optimization is a thing. Again I am not qualified to refute it, you would need to study for years to form a proper opinion.

>>510821549
>bible faggot
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

>>510821451
>upgrade your gpt
what gpt, he's just having a meltdown copypasting the same reply over and over, I love these threads.

>>510821347
>Ah so you're not arguing against atheism but someone's personal preference.
sort of, yeah.
my point i've been saying over and over starting from the first post in this thread was that "atheism" can mean many things within different contexts and with different qualifiers, yet atheists have this creepy mantra that forces the definition of "atheism is not a belief, it is merely a lack of belief in a gods" to limit the use of the term "atheism" just mean one specific philosophically worthless definition, sagan's "agnostic atheism" which atheists use to hide behind since they can't actually argue for their real position, that they believe God doesn't exist.

>>510821563
>There is zero evidence that consciousness exists
>t. average atheist

>>510821555
>>510821591
>using pass to spam copypaste replies
again, for the third time, embarrassing.

>>510811018
>as evidence that term cannot have another meaning, expanded meaning, or even conflicting meaning.
Except that doesn't apply here, you fucking retard, because there is no other meaning. It's a very simple term, single digit IQ retards like you just started saying "hurr atheists just hate gaaawwwddd" and because most of you are single digit IQ retards (there are some theologians and individuals out there that have weird reasons for what they believe and are otherwise unretarded, unfortunately they're the minority) it caught on. Just because a bunch of retards got together and said something was true doesn't mean it is, none of you has ever elaborated, you just make vague statements that you think no one sees through because you think everyone else is as crater-skulled as you are.

>>510821563
atheists can't even cogito ergo sum

>>510821688
You're all following the exact same pattern of atheist behavior so I think it's worth pointing out every time you do it like the predictable atheist automatons that you are. :^)

>>510807875
>in reality atheists all believe and vote for the exact same garbage things with almost zero divergence
>vote in lockstep with eachother and the jews.
Post documentation for your claims, and post documentation for populations outside Israel and USA having ever seen a jew and even know how such do vote.

>atheism is whiniest religion in the world
Post documentation for irreligious = religious.

>>510821603
> my point i've been saying over and over starting from the first post in this thread was that "atheism" can mean many things within different contexts and with different qualifiers,

But it doesn’t and you’re wrong lmao.
>muh sort of

Just inagine most skeptics take your supposed meaning the same way a skeptic would tell you the meaning of being a christian.

>>510821710
>there is no other meaning
Evidence for this claim?

>>510821751
>*strawmans*
>i am so smart
peak abrahamist intellectual

>>510821651
Ok, provide evidence of any single thing in this world being consciousness. You can't do it, since consciousness is outside what can be observed.

If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

Every atheist ITT did this.

>>510821710
>there is no other meaning (to atheism)
there's strong atheism, weak atheism, positive atheism, negative atheism, explicit atheism, implicit atheism, practical atheism, theoretical atheism, philosophical atheism, scientific atheism, militant atheism, humanistic atheism, nu-atheism, existential atheism, skeptical atheism, gnostic atheism, agnostic atheism, marxist atheism, secular atheism, spiritual atheism, empirical atheism, nihilistic atheism, post-theistic atheism, cultural atheism, psychological atheism, methodological atheism, ethical atheism, political atheism, naturalistic atheism, dogmatic atheism, progressive atheism, critical atheism, quiet atheism, minimal atheism, maximal atheism, meta-atheism, etc

>>510821651
why post a picture of yourself

>>510821947
>provide evidence of any single thing in this world being consciousness
There's no need to. It's sufficient to point out your post as a good example of what atheism leads to.

>>510806144 (OP)
Kek

>>510821971
>holy buzzword collection batman

Did you get it from reddit? Lmao

>>510822080
kekw roflmfao do you see my point i was making though honk skeet?

>>510822148
Sounds like a collection of social media tags that have literally nothing to do with anything related to atheism lmao.

Reminder that if atheism was only a "lack of belief" it wouldn't be so easy to predict 80% of your beliefs based on your identifying with it. Seethe.

I would be embarassed to spend hours in a thread making 50+ posts and not a single post had any substance. Not a single argument made. Just seething and insulting. What was the point of that? Next time present an argument so we can at least have some fun.

>>510820235
>>510822352
>appeal to dictionary fallacy
Isn't it weird how all of you repeat exactly the same fallacious talking point and then try to back it up with the exact same fallacious argument, even though supposedly all you have in common is "lack of belief in God"?

>godtards not sending their best,
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

>>510822350
reminder your 4chan schizo headcanon doesn't apply to real life

>>510822512
>>510820817
Notice how I correctly predicted your refusal to answer the question. Obviously, most of those statements apply. I can make a whole list of statements about you with 80%+ certainty just based on your identification with the atheist label, therefore atheism is NOT just a "lack of belief in god". This statement is an empirically demonstrable truth.

>>510822350
But I bet you’d love it when an atheist starts dictating what is true christian behavior and meaning though. Imagine an atheist dictating to you tenets about forgiveness and humility? Tenets about your own belief?

>>510806144 (OP)
Fuck you, fuck trump, fuck christianity, fuck republicans and fuck all of the pedophilic origins it's all based on. You're all slaves in Talmudic scripture.

>>510821603
>>Ah so you're not arguing against atheism but someone's personal preference.
>sort of, yeah.
Cool. No need to keep up with the false equivalency via strawman

>>510822614
have a good night brother

>>510821603
>atheism" can mean many things within different contexts and with different qualifiers
All of it points back to a lack of belief

>>510822684
>But I bet you’d love it when an atheist starts dictating what is true christian behavior and meaning though. Imagine an atheist dictating to you tenets about forgiveness and humility? Tenets about your own belief?
And here we go again. If you argue a point with an atheist and he starts to lose, he will revert to tangential "arguments" based on slandering your supposed theistic beliefs. Even if you never express any. At that point, he has already determined that you are NOT an atheist. This exclusion isn't based on his bogus definition, but simply because you disagree with his pattern of thinking. Even the dumbest, crudest atheists have an intuitive sense that 'atheism' is not actually what they define it to be.

This is another characteristic shared by all atheists ^

>>510822786
gg. This was funny.