>>510825367 (OP)
bump

>>510825396

We must secure the existence of our excrement.

>>510825367 (OP)
joseph p farrell just released 2 books on this topic, "the richmond rialto" or something similar to that.

>>510825396

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white excretas.

>>510827179
>We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white excretas.

Not exactly. It's a great start, however.

>>510825367 (OP)
Most of the high level generals in the Civil War were free masons. This is why they had a lot of respect for each other (despite being "enemies"), and absolutely no respect for their own cannon fodder soldiers.

>>510825367 (OP)
Wern't the "serfs" freed right around the same time in Europe as the American Civil war raged?

>>510828992
Freemasonry wasn't always super fagged and they weren't actually all just Freemasons. Did you know Lincoln blamed the Civil War on the Jesuits and Rome?

>>510829034
The emancipation of the serfs in Europe had more to do with weakening European nobility in favor of the banks. Now that serfs were emancipated, they could store their earnings at a bank (Jews), whereas before this Lords would act as their serf's banker. The serf was just as unfree as they were before, since the bank would always miraculously lose their money anyway.

>>510829115
Nah they were almost entirely protestant, Catholics had no influence in the US back then. You could probably say this about the Irish being Jesuits as their reason for fighting against the South had more to do with fighting against their English oppressors. There was always bad blood between the English and the Irish in the US.

>>510825367 (OP)
Too simplistic.
Rothbard did a study of the last 150 years of elites in america and found three distinct power blocks, loosely joined by marriage bonds yet still distinct.
Morgans, the old anglosaxon money
Rockefellers, of oil and railroads power
Rothschilds, also called "wall street".
They get things done very fast when all three factions agree on something. They rule the united states but dont have any plan except a desire to not lose their power.

>>510829034
>>510829170
The Roman "Nobility" had been undermining Europe's Nobility for quite some time already. The Donation of Constantine is a perfect example. Then there's Jus Primae Noctis. Finally, if you want to really understand where European Nobility took its final blows, you'll want to see the Irish Potato Famine and the Highland Clearances.
We can't forget the French Revolution either.
>>510829345
I take it you'll enjoy reading this, seeing that you're wrong.
Also, my response above explains the Irish and English Hostility. The Brits starved them on purpose to clear them out of their ancestral homes.
Wait until you find out what Hadrian and Caesar were really looking for though. Funnily, I've already given you a serious clue.

>>510825396
Jews believe that they deserve to own everything in the world and have the goyim as slaves. The Talmud prophecies state that this will occur when their messiah arrives. This is why they hate Jesus and Christians so much.

>The Jewish people taken collectively will themselves be their Messiah. Its reign over the Universe will be achieved by the unification of the other human races, the abolition of frontiers and monarchies, which are the bulwark of particularism, and the establishment of a Universal Republic which will recognise everywhere the rights of citizens to the Jews.
>In this new organisation of Humanity, the sons of Israel, spread from now on over the whole surface of the globe, all of the same race and of the same traditional formation without, however, forming a distinct nationality, will become without opposition the leading element everywhere, especially if they succeed in imposing on the working masses the stable leadership of some of their number.

>The governments of the Nations forming the Universal Republic will all pass effortlessly into Israelite hands, thanks to the victory of the proletariat. Individual property can then be abolished by the rulers of the Judaic race who will administer the public fortune everywhere. In this way the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, that when the Times of the Messiah have come, the Jews will hold under their keys the property of all the peoples of the world.

> Baruch Lévy, in a letter to Karl Marx.

https://craighutchinson.substack.com/p/the-secret-origins-of-bolshevism

>>510828992

>>510825367 (OP)
Thanks for giving us your faggot bankers. Fuckin wanker

>>510829115
>>510829115
did you know russia sent warships over to help and that's just another reason this banking elite don't like them

Conthspirathy theorist!

>>510829785
>help lincoln

>>510829422
Rothschilds used Morgans as their goy pawns, often via their Schoenberg/Belmont agents
Rockefellers were largely independent from Rothschilds (who did provide early capital iirc) because Rothschilds initially missed the boat on petroleum (that's why they rapidly built up Shell as SO rival soon as they realized their mistake)

>>510829785
So Russia is actually very focused on expanded global infrastructure. The current regime would rather maintain China as the manufacturing hub and sees their population as more manageable (hence the Covid tests on the population).
Russia has expressed publicly that they would support a Texas Separatist movement in the US. The real meaning behind this is that Russia has made public their intention to support the reconfiguration of the current global power dynamic, where the USA is not controlled by DC, sort of like England not being controlled by London and so on.
London and DC are simply vassals, City-States.

>>510825367 (OP)
They're on up there, but Satan has his own head.

>>510829115
lincoln was a temple bar member of the city of london and the south was supported by the vatican
the war was a mercenary conflict hq'ed out of puerto rico
everything taught about it is a lie

>>510825367 (OP)
What we mean when we say
>its the jews

>>510830143
>So the Civil War was fought by agents of Roman "Nobility" pretending to be on opposing sides
Lincoln wasn't perfect or anything, but this seems a bit performative. What other suggestions do you have to throw us off the trail? Go ahead. This will be fun.

>>510825396
I'm more confident every day that Earth (a sentient being) will bring balance back. It's pretty much a law of nature. It's always trying to create equilibrium. Pray to God and Earth mother to extinguish these beings.

>>510829522
I don't doubt it, Jesuits have always hated the Freemasons for fucking everything up for them. First with the formation of the French republic and then with the founding of the United States, both are anti-monarchical. They are mortal enemies.

Unless you're one of those idiots who think they're the same.

>>510830494
Jesuits and Freemasons currently have the very same masters. The Founding of the USA was not a Freemasonry-sanctioned event. It was just the opposite.
No, we did not "keep it" either, unfortunately.

Still, Catholics never had any real influence or control in US politics. They were constantly demonized and the Vatican did try, but these were only feeble attempts at usurping US power.

If there was any attempt, it was a meager one. The side that "won" the civil war is in many ways much worse than the Vatican bogeyman.

>>510830678
>t-the Vatican never had any influence in the US, guys
topfuckingkek
Look at this guy squirm.

>>510825396
Jews are worthless parasites incapable of invention or production.
They are no more fit to lead than a tapeworm is fit to be a human brain

>>510825367 (OP)
there are so many people that trully believe that the civil war was not about slavery. Of course it was about slavery.

Not to abolish it of course, that would be stupid. The war was to stop the rich southerners to move west with their slaves and leave the north with nothing but the leftovers.

>>510830750
Sure bud, everything that came out of your mouth is the opposite of the truth.

>>510830946
Once again, the Vatican promised the South that they'd have backup if they fought back against North-inspired shipping blockades. The South had all the resources and the North wanted in on it. They freed all their slaves in an effort to dismantle production efforts and then blockaded shipments near the coast.
The Jesuits are agents of subterfuge and have been for a very long time.
>>510831084
Thanks for your support. Maybe if you keep cheerleading for the Vatican, you'll get a cookie or a perfectly unused young boy to fondle at your discretion.

>>510829115
>Lincoln blamed the Civil War on the Jesuits and Rome?
Those were rake quotes made up by Lewis Charles Levin.

>>510825367 (OP)
they are also responsible for dispensationalism becoming common in White protestant churches., the idea that jews retain their original covenant separate from the covenant Jesus established, which is the basis of "Christian Zionism".
Before that the predominant belief was that jews were in rebellion to God and needed to repent.

>>510830946
learn the history of the international bankers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IFhQBTupkI

>>510831175
Fifty Years in the Church of Rome by Charles Chiniquy.
The man was a former Catholic priest turned Protestant.
All you have is dumb ass fake bullshit. Typical Roman propaganda.

>>510830946
Emancipation is nothing more than the transferal of slaves and serfs from plantation owning masters to central banks. The freeing of serfs and slaves have more to do with taking property from the nobility and handing it over to Jews. In other words, Gentiles are not allowed to be noblemen, and so the ownership of serfs and slaves must be made illegal.

That is the Freemason's only accomplishment, and its consequences are disastrous (the modern world we're living in). We now get to experience the horrors of Communism in our lifetimes, we're already 80% there.

>>510825367 (OP)
Lincoln was a fag

>>510831366
>Emancipation is nothing more than the transferal of slaves and serfs from plantation owning masters to central banks.
welp

>>510831366
Look, I know you're trying and maybe you're not stupid on purpose. It's probably just a complex of psyops and you not being smart enough to internally understand the proper pathways, so let me help you out.
You're doing well on the whole rebranded Slavery concept; it's true that slavery for plantations was a far better position than slavery for central bankers. That's all perfectly true. The issue is you equate regular free men to Nobility, which is hilariously misunderstood.
Real nobles free their subjects from the confines of these Central Bankers, they don't lose them to such inert forces.
>jews
Rothschilds own the Vatican. Rothschilds created Israel. "Judaism" is a fake Matrix-esque ruse designed to get you to swat at ghosts while they reach into your pocket and take all your money.
>undermining Southern Plantation owners
Right. It's about restructuring their production means. If they no longer own slaves, they no longer have such a means of production. As such, losing their slaves halts their economic influence, subordinating them to said Central Bankers. Hamilton was spot on, for the record.
>Freemasonry's only accomplishment
Freemasons supporting Free Men and the Vatican propping up the control infrastructure are two sides of the same ruse, dummy.
For the hundredth time, the Founding Fathers outplayed the Freemasons. Anon, remember that London is Freemasonry just as London is Roman "Nobility".

>>510829522
What were the Romans looking for?

>>510831954
The Royals they'd been hunting for centuries.

>>510831143
At this point the crimes committed by Freemasons and their Judeo-bolshevik/Judeo-christian friends exceeds the crimes of the Vatican by 100-fold. If anything the form of colonialism employed by the Catholic Church was substantially less brutal, as evidenced by the fact that everywhere the British went the natives disappeared, whereas everywhere the Spanish/Portuguese went the natives (albeit mixed) are here with us today.

I'm sure if the English took over the Philippines instead of the Spanish we wouldn't have any Filipinos. Then again, Filipinos are fucking disgusting so, you may have a point that maybe the Vatican was too generous to their victims in the fact that they're still here with us today, whereas Indigenous north Americans are pretty much non-existent, as are any other indigenous peoples the British had the pleasure of wiping out. Fuck the English even tried to genocide the Dutch (protestant!) in South Africa, evil fucking pests. And don't get me started on the non-nuclear bombings of Dejima (Japan) and Dresden (Germany).

So tell me what has the Vatican done wrong here. They don't look like tyrants to me, it looks like the people who are in charge right now are the tyrants that have made the world such a miserable place to live in.

>>510832005
I’m sorry if i sound off base or stupid, but what kind of royalty? Carthage and Phoenician? Or a pre-date of even that?

>>510831350
The quotes about the Jesuits attributed to Lincoln were all created by the Know-Nothings.

>>510825367 (OP)
Are you sure? Their rise began almost simultaneously with chabad and there were close ties right from the start. I think it's possible that rothschild was only ever chabad's bankers. Note also that the earliest appearance of the name epstein was a chabad rabbi and that jeffrey epstein did his business through the rothschild bank in switzerland.

>>510832428
You're good at this, anon. I take it this is more rhetorical for you, though.
>>510832202
>whereas everywhere the Spanish/Portuguese went the natives (albeit mixed) are here with us today.
They literally committed mass genocides on at least three different well-known historically recorded occasions.
>Indigenous north americans are pretty much non-existent
My guy, do you not understand how much native pussy loved Quakers?
>tell me what the Vatican done wrong here
I mean, chopping off choir boys' balls so you can soil their butts seems pretty bad to me. Then you throw in the genocides, hunting down Jesus' family for thousands of years and attempting global enslavement and, voila, you've got Holy See = Evil Central.
Rome didn't fall, you simpleton. It just became "The Vatican". Guess what its "Nobles" are up to now. That's right, they're establishing countries like Israel and compromising all of your politicians with child orgies they conveniently film and dangle over heads like Damocles.
>>510832650
These are mere claims that you just sort of made up. Again, I suggest reading works like those written by men who spent 50 years being a Catholic priest and decided that was stupid. By all means, continue this desperate charade. I'm not going anywhere though.

>>510831818
>For the hundredth time, the Founding Fathers outplayed the Freemasons. Anon, remember that London is Freemasonry just as London is Roman "Nobility".

The very essence of the American republic is Masonic by design. You got played by Alex Jones.

The constitution was a big "fuck you" to the church. Freedom of speech, religion and assembly, aka Fuck the church. Honestly, fuck all non-Jewish religious institutions who do they think they are?

The document was a big "fuck you" to the so called "despots" of Europe, and now China and the Middle East. At face value the emancipation/liberation of the serf population from the then greedy "evil land owning capitalists" was a noble cause. In hindsight, this is no different than the modern pink-haired genderfluid abomination wanting even more liberalism today. Xhe is nothing more than a product of the very "Liberalism" you love so much.

The end result is a giant free range human pen where everyone is "free" for the Jewish run bank (as in, you cost nothing to a bank who can buy you for free). If I were a serf, I'd rather have a price tag attached to my head, rather than be seen as a "free commodity". Even better I'd rather be a fucking liability so I'm not exploited for my "free labor".

The same people who think liberalism is a disease fail to realize that Chris Chan and Benjamin Franklin are really no different from each other. Liberalism today is as much a disease as classical liberalism was back then.

I wonder what the world would look like if the Vatican won. It would probably be a better place than whatever the fuck it has turned into. I'm not even Catholic.

>>510832428
>Carthage and Phoenician?
>tophet stele
>has the fucking eiffel tower on it

cohencidence I'm sure

>>510833068
You can directly trace the Lincoln quotes to the Know-Nothings, led by the jew Lewis Charles Levin.

Jesuit conspiracy theories are unique in how much they rely on proven, unquestionable hoaxes. Talk to any black-poper long enough, and you'll hear an appeal to the fake Albert Pike letter.

>>510833306
>says things
>no proof

let's try giving proof for a change, how's that sound?

>>510825367 (OP)

>>510828852
Wrong. OP is exactly correct.

Duffalian

It equals 74 which Checks Out !


A turkish anon mentioned it ones .
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/503090960/#503090960

Thread got No replies

>>510833249

>>510833200
>The very essence of the American republic is Masonic by design. You got played by Alex Jones.
Washington was a famous Spy, you retard.
>The constitution was a big "fuck you" to the church. Freedom of speech, religion and assembly, aka Fuck the church. Honestly, fuck all non-Jewish religious institutions who do they think they are?
The FFs produced very public documents declaring that, although they're very displeased about the inevitable ramifications, they have to be purists in the right to freedom of religion. They explicitly named "Jews" and expressed their reluctance.
>fuck you to despots of Europe
That's right, they were fleeing the compromised "Royal" houses of Europe. Washington feigned a Freemasonic enterprise and was widely renowned for a very long time following the rebellious act.
>you love Liberalism
Classical Liberalism, sure. Freemasonry wasn't so bad at one time, but it's been quite a while.
>I'm not even Catholic
Yet you were a Catholic Cheerleader uniform and everything. You could have fooled all of us, with your desperate defenses and everything.
>>510833249
>muh tophets
Shall we explain Period Blood of the High Priestess and Semen of the High Priest, everyone?
No, muh Carthage and Phoenician Royals were not mass baby murderers like Rome was desperate for everyone to convince normalfags.
You're looking for the word "Scythian" and a man named Mil Espaine.
>>510833306
The trouble is I gave you a man's name and a book to read and you're still pretending that it was all made up.
The Vatican's agents have been globally known as a cult of assassins and political operators for such a long time now that this isn't much more than a humorous assertion.

>>510833068
Who didn't commit a genocide from the 1500s-1800s?. If anything the British were #1 by a huge margin, a victim of their own success. Communists are #2 by the way and they only achieved this in 300 years since the Jacobin revolution.

The Catholics (who are tied with Muslims in the number they've killed) would simply genocide anyone who didn't convert whereas the British did not even give the natives the opportunity to convert. All I need to know is I have yet to see an indigenous American in my entire life other than a few wax statues at some museum no one visits, whereas there are Spanish speaking hobgoblins everywhere and they pour from the Southern border by the millions. Where did the indigenous Americans go?

Where are these mixed race Quakers you speak of? Quakers were the least terrible of the bunch, my guess is these English-Amerindian hybrids all reside in West Virginia now as America's rejects. Wow, so tolerant, so liberal! Definitely not despotic by any means.

>>510833769
>extended version

>>510834029
>extended version
Thanks anon. Saved.

>>510834169

>>510833746
>>510833769
>>510833839
One more time, Jus Primae Noctis, Donation of Constantine and Highland Clearances.
Caesar simply made up "they all eat babies".
Surely there were atrophied replications of the rituals. I'd never deny that and I doubt any sane person would either. But to suggest that all of them were just mass raping and murdering babies, as if that wasn't Rome's doing the whole time, is ludicrous.
Rome chased the former Royals (the actual Royals, not retarded mud bloods pretending to be "Royal") all the way into the British Isles, hunting down the remnants of the families their leaders had been hunting ever since "Jesus" and his family fled the area.
The rituals were about consuming hormone-rich sexual fluids. They were clearly atrophied and normalniggers had no idea how to progress the rituals or what to do with the leftovers, so they all went full retard. This was prior to "Jesus" fleeing, however.
To learn more about why "Jesus" had to flee, you'll need to learn about his family, what the "Refrigerium" was and why he and his friends were doing it and what it means to "talk to dead people" in a more colloquial context.
They've started spamming this thread in an effort to slide the information expressed here. You should all understand this to be a form of Signal Reduction by now.

>>510825396
Proof he said this? Looks like propaganda.

>>510833652
>No cold war
>No korea
>No Vietnam
But at what COST?
Eradication of millions of jews, blacks, gays, gypsies and mentally challenged, perhaps a still on going nazi rule over Europe if not world.
Is that what you'd want? REALLY?

>>510833957
The Brits and the Vatican have the same owners, moran.
>Where are these mixed race Quakers you speak of?
Now it's a distant memory and that was obviously a joke, you retard.
>Quakers weren't so bad
That's sort of the point, bud.
>English-Amerindian hybrids all reside in WV now
Nah, it's more like AZ, NM, the Dakotas, and a few places dotting the Mountain West region. There are fun theories about the Melungeon, however.
>2JGAY

>>510833068
I don’t think rhetorical is accurate? I asked cause I don’t know what other culture would have royals they would be hunting. Going back farther didn’t make much sense because, well, I am open to theories, but I do add some realism to the procedure. Babylon or Sumerian Royals seemed like a stretch.
>>510833249
Oh would you look at that!

>>510834332
You're asking for proof of a statement on the deathbed? There will probably be no more than the person who handed it down. If you want to read real propaganda, I recommend the tales of the chabad storyteller nissan mindel about the rothschilds.
>https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/112275/jewish/The-Rothschild-Family.htm
>https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/112390/jewish/The-Father-of-The-Rothschilds.htm

>>510825367 (OP)
Nice fanfic you retard. The north is where the bankers were you dumb faggot.

>>510834656
>Oh would you look at that!
makes ya think, doughnut

>>510834332
Rothschilds are not "jewish". They don't use "Religious" Morality Frames like they use on you.
>>510834656
I told you here >>510833828
The muh tophets fags are Signal Reduction bots meant to impede your understanding.
The "Rothschild" family, the Bauers, are mere usurpers. The whole "Rothschilds are remnants of Phoenicians and all the Phoenicians killed babies because of muh tophets" is a mindfuck operation meant to conceal what was actually happening. It co-opts the deprecation of the rituals, explained here >>510834276 vaguely, and uses the confusion to get you to both not try to find out who they stole the thrones from and also to not learn more about the Metaphysics involved with these subjects. This scares you away, hinging upon Evangelical frames of "good and evil", mostly taking advantage of your misunderstanding of Platonian Metaphysics, which would otherwise help you realize that Daemons aren't evil and that you're meant to use them, sort of like "Jesus" did here, when convening with Aurelia Prima via the Refriguerium.
Making all of this much more concise isn't really possible while maintaining communication coherence. We risk Idiocracying any further attempts at communication.

>>510825367 (OP)
It's dubious given France and German ststes were tacitly supporting the North with Russia officially endorsing the Union, while the U.K. sent both observers and investors to the Confederacy, it remained officially neutral...moreover this was probably because they figured the Confederacy would expand South and they could get a good return on investment and to cause itchybum in Washington.

I have doubts. Private Brits definitely helped run blockades and sell arms. Maybe there is some involvement there.

FUNNILY ENOUGH I personally know a Rothschild. He is a very nice guy, though infamously a womaniser lol. Talented in his fields, gives bsck to the community and didn't want any part in the family riches. He let his father (an American) buy him a very nice car and that was his compromise lol.

>it's a very big family

>>510835004
>In the fall of 1859, Salomon de Rothschild, the son of Baron James de Rothschild of Paris, came to the United States as a tourist. His travels in the North and South were recorded in a series of letters to his cousin Nathaniel in London, which are stored in the Manuscripts Division of the Library of Congress.
>Although Rothschild's visit was as a private tourist and not a business trip for his family's banking firm, he met with prominent personalities and commented intelligently on the issues of the day. His views on the conflict between the North and the South were decidedly pro-Confederate and his letters urged his cousin to use all his family's influence to gain the recognition of the Confederacy by the European powers.

>>510825396
Gentiles at least possess the one thing these kikes will never have. A soul.

>>510835074
>t-they're not all that bad
>it's a big family so they're not all on the same page
Maybe Rofsy was a good example here, but why should we be convinced?
A debt is a debt, don't you know?

>>510835074
>jeWb0cDR

At this point they may as well be dead since their descendants have no real institutional power. Their legacy (inheritace) is now in the form of institutions which have enough financial momentum to live forever. The people who work in these institution have no blood relation to the original rothschilds, they are just faceless employees who carry out their will. These are all in the form of tax sheltered foundations and endowments who pay people to work for them, and they're a money fountain since the entire structure of the financial system serves to pay these people to keep the structure intact.

The only way to kill this parasite is to have the government collapse and the taxpayer base, since these endowments are all taxpayer funded.

The people who pulled this off are long dead, it's a financially run automaton/parasite that feeds off the taxpayer now through interest. Their descendants are not to blame, they are riding the coattails of a legacy that was left to them by very powerful individuals hundreds of years ago.

>>510835406
Don't get me wrong, the man was a party animal in his day. But he's a good soul and now that he is middle aged and a father (to a non jewish kid) he seems more focussed on making an actual honest living and transmitting his skills for free.

>>510835440
If you told him about the deep conspiracy he would probably have only heard the vaguest terms. I had heard that some of the senior Rothschilds had actually converted to Christianity in recent years.

As it is however I'm not sure I fully agree that there is no conscious involvement in global finance on their part. Their wealth is somewhat overstated and they aren't the only "famiglia" out there. But you still see the name connected with two things: financial news, and ngos

>>510835440
It's abundantly evident you have no idea how an empire works, how Royalty has functioned through the ages, how influence is maintained or how Nepotism really works.
They've systematized control. It makes little difference if one of their descendants falls off the wagon or pulls a Rofsy. They have enough inheritors and the egregore is accessible enough that the descendants can simply progress the overarching goals without much need for manual control.
>>510835922
A debt is a debt. There will be no compromises.

>>510835967
>drama llama

It's too early for this. Time for some bacon and eggs

>>510836071
I bet framing it as "drama" makes loads of sense when shoes go on other feet.
That's too bad.

>>510836326
>Charles Manson babbling

This isn't the bus stop

>>510835036
Ok, Mil is new to me. I already know of the Scythians. However, they seemed to have a more Proto-Euro vibe than anything else. As one of the original horse lords.

Mil traveled and fought in Egypt and Hispania, but died to the Irish Gods in legend.

I am a bit taken aback by the Scythian connection. Are you implying the Scyths were the royals?