← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 510884765

16 posts 16 images 9 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: fx7nhzVP) United States No.510884765 >>510885333 >>510885485 >>510885520 >>510885789 >>510886174
Why don't shills want to talk about Epstein
I mean *really* talk about epstein, you know, his connection to israel and the ZIONIST movement.
Why are they so reluctant to talk about that?
Anonymous (ID: oFXF+ZZw) United States No.510885333
>>510884765 (OP)
Truly a mystery of all time
Anonymous (ID: 2dUBpr78) United States No.510885485 >>510886661 >>510887215
>>510884765 (OP)
I think you know the answer, but its basically sunk cost fallacy combined with a low level of intellect. They have put so, so much faith into trump (its been 10 years since he came into the political scene) that throughout it all, there has always been an ‘out’ to defend whatever he does. This, nor anything else will ever be enough to break the circuit. Its unfortunate, but thats why.
Anonymous (ID: 5R9MGm6+) United States No.510885520
>>510884765 (OP)
>constantly 50 threads about Epstein
>each where OP posts maybe once or twice
>allegations without sources against Trump
>get called every name under the sun for asking "Source?"
Who's the shill?
Anonymous (ID: TuleTj5E) United States No.510885789
>>510884765 (OP)
Because Trump is in the files
Anonymous (ID: pXBTuNpi) Canada No.510886174 >>510887169 >>510887295
>>510884765 (OP)
>2007
>this resulted in the collapse of the fund and the collapse of Bear Stearns itself only a few weeks later
I already tried correcting this slop in another thread but it's still posted. This is complete horseshit and brings into question the rest of the slop being presented.
1) Bear Stearns failed in March 2008, which is 11 months after Epstein's withdrawal.
2) The Bear Stearns funds collapsed in July 2007, which was 3 months after Epstein's withdrawal, so obviously not caused by it.
3) The writing was on the wall about subprime since Feb 2007, so many smart people were pulling their money out. It wasn't just a handful of people who saw the problems like Michael Lewis' narrative would have us believe. Lewis highlighted a few of them in The Big Short, but there were many, many people pulling their money out of these funds at least. Epstein's $57 million was a drop in the bucket when it comes to redemptions.

OP's picrel is slop. Do better.
Anonymous (ID: hrfvH64+) United States No.510886661 >>510886987
>>510885485
You're not talking about Epstein.
You're talking about Trump.
You're exactly what OP. is talking about.

Epstein's whole life defies belief, it's just Jew connection after Jew connection as he monkey branches his way from obscurity into becoming arguably one of the most powerful men in the world.

Yet you think the real story is an Trump.
Anonymous (ID: TuleTj5E) United States No.510886987 >>510887070
>>510886661
>stop talking about Trump in the files goy
Anonymous (ID: hrfvH64+) United States No.510887070 >>510887230
>>510886987
>Stop talking about the JEWS talk about the goyim!
No.
Anonymous (ID: fx7nhzVP) United States No.510887169
>>510886174
Incorrect, the selling of Epsteins assets that month began a repricing process and general freeze in the CDO market. The repricing of the CDO assets caused the collapse of the fund three months later in July, and the eventual collapse of Bear Stearns in March 2008
Anonymous (ID: DFm3YZBB) United States No.510887215
>>510885485
>They have put so, so much faith into trump
It's not faith. Trump is actually deporting illegals and everything else we asked for. Versus unfounded accusations after a decade of Democrat created hoaxes. At this point we know there's nothing significant against Trump. The FBI would have leaked everything years ago. No faith required.
Anonymous (ID: TuleTj5E) United States No.510887230 >>510887914
>>510887070
Look at you. You're tone policing Epstein conversations on /pol/.
Anonymous (ID: PRyQFqzT) United States No.510887295
>>510886174
The market can remain irrational longer than you can understand. Withdrawing funds takes months for the effect down the pipeline.
Anonymous (ID: hrfvH64+) United States No.510887914 >>510888070
>>510887230
>Look at you. You're tone policing Epstein conversations on /pol/.
Yes.
Is that supposed to be bad? You say "on /pol", like this is a board for shit posting. Shills like you have done your best to transform it into that, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be calked out for what you are

You are promoting a narrative.
That narrative is that America has a goy problem and not a Jew problem, which is why you only want to talk about the goyim and not the fact that Epstein is a JEW who ran a JEWISH (not Israeli) blackmail scheme which was a key component of the infrastructure JEWS use to control America and it's sphere of influence.
Anonymous (ID: TuleTj5E) United States No.510888070 >>510889796
>>510887914
What are your thoughts about this infographic?
Anonymous (ID: hrfvH64+) United States No.510889796
>>510888070
I remember I used to think Lovecraft was ridiculous, that the idea that there could be revelations that drive you insane was silly, but its genuinely true. Some revelations can be so terrifying that even just a glimpse of their implications can send you off spiralling into the realm of anything is possible because everything is a lie.

That's why I can't fault flat earthers. They're just victims who've had their minds broken by catching a glimpse of the beast.

The idea that Epstein was just a bit player in a much larger system, one blackmail scheme among many ( who is the gay Epstein, who is the ACTUAL pedophile Epstein that deals in genuine children and not teenagers, is there a snuff Epstein, is pizzagate all smoke and no fire?) is terrifying.