Thread 510981299

>US Army Soldiers from @7thATC, the Joint Multinational Training Group-Ukraine and @173rdAbnBde execute the Army's first live-grenade drop from an unmanned aircraft system in Grafenwoehr Training Area, Germany.
Isn't that impressive /pol/?: https://x.com/USArmy/status/1947265395733188705?

>>510981299 (OP)
That will be 100k plus foreskin

>>510981299 (OP)
Yes a lot in Ukrainian videos.

>>510981299 (OP)
Look at that over engineered, expensive as stupid piece of shit. Holy fuck we are cooked.

>>510981299 (OP)
Why would you want to? What tactical advantage is that over KAMIKAZE impact explosive drones?

>>510981299 (OP)
>spending 50k to do something that's can be accomplished with a 200 dollar temu drone and some zip ties
very semitic

>>510982614
Reusability obviously, however the survival rate for a drone of this nature will become so bad so quickly on a modern battlefield the cost savings of reusability are irrelevant

>>510981299 (OP)
why is it so overdesigned? Just throw a servo on a $200 analog drone and get to work, lmfao.

>>510982683
Well how do you expect the MIC to profit from this otherwise? they sure as fuck won't make hundreds of them a day for pennies in profits

>>510982317
Same but in lots of Russian videos since I'm not a tranny

>>510982788
It feels like a woman designed it. It’s trash. You would want some kind of propulsion style grenade on a drone, not a “drop” like a fucking hand claw prize machine. You would also want multiple rounds per drone. Not just one.

It’s a tactical failure from brainlet nigger or female designers.

>>510982614
It feels like it was designed by a retard in a special ed arts class. First of all a grenadier drone and a “kamikaze” drone should not have anywhere NEAR any similarity in design. The fact that you’re even bringing it up just illustrates what a FAILURE this drone design is.

>>510981299 (OP)
yes i saw ISIS do it about 10 years ago.

>>510982802
Women clearly designed it.

A grenadier drone should be capable of launching multiple rounds in reasonably swift succession. BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY. FOR WHAT FUCNING REASON DOES IT NEED TO BE A SOLO DESIGN.

A grenadier drone should be a standard infantry replacement drone design- modeled around the guncraft, parts temp dispersion and aerodynamics built up around that flowstyle. It should have a grenade launching attachment.

A stupid fucking woman made this one.

Is a grenade heavier than a water balloon, I've done that. 'Innawoods gearing up is going to need better suppliers in the near future.

>>510983609
Women or Indian DEI hires.

>>510982514
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OixSNQp0S_k
nigger don't be stupid

example of male-designed drones, done in the free market. no government contracts, pure product offering.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEXI6r08908

>>510983871
Literally looks like a civilian boomer neighbor harasser drone that somebody attached an arcade claw to

>>510981299 (OP)

all drone pilots should be executed without trial change my mind

Kek. You can make a dropper unit with an arduino nano, servo, battery, radio transmitter, and antenna. Costs maybe $40. I bet the army will spend $50k on these things.