>>511027782The modern peer-review process only checks for obvious mistakes.
Neither the editors nor the reviewers are testing or making any attempt at replicating your results.
Even other readers most likely won't bother replicating your shit because they have limited time and resources.
If you're in a obscure field dealing with some niche topic, you can publish literal made up garbage and nobody will find out.
There're studies that prompet ChatGPT to writte papers with random non-sense and published those papers no problem, showing how bad the peer-review system is.
The only people that ever get caught nowadays are people who publish their bullshit in popular magazines about popular topics and make groundbreaking, potentially paradigm shifting claims.