>>511037692
They’re not.
See my first comment.
Before the days of “political correctness” there were well-respected anthropologists who presented compelling evidence that blacks, whites, Asians, Aborigines and Bornean, and natives of the North and Americas were all different species—or at least all sub-species—of Homo erectus.
The black-white comparison is of particular interest when you compare Africa’s history to that of Western Europe and North America. At a time when Europeans were in the Age of Enlightenment—building enormous ships and exploring the world, using math to solve real-world problems, and developing all sorts of technology—simultaneously Africans were living like proto-humans did thousands of years before them. Some still are.
Africa never produced a single explorer, astronomer, great mathematician, navigator, scientists, etc. during that time (1600 to ~1800) Even in modern industrial and post-industrial times, not a single car, shipyard, aerospace company, etc.—nothing to demonstrate an ability to work with high technology and utilize teamwork. For anthropologists, this should raise eyebrows.
Americans and Europeans have collectively poured trillions of dollars into various African countries and they absolutely cannot figure out how to use it to their advantage. Only a select few benefit while millions of their own people starve.
Furthermore, if you take them en masse to a prosperous country, at least 80% will revert to the African way of violence and thievery—a pattern that’s at least 200 years old.
Finally, even when their own people return home to Africa, they kill them. In 1822, Fmr President James Monroe bought the country of Liberia for freed slaves to return home to. When they did, they instantly started arguing. The Liberian Civil War is still raging 300 years later.
Surely one of these things is not like the other.
