If Elon Musk is so "based", why doesn't he ban porn from X, formerly Twitter?

Free speech

>>511043670 (OP)
there is porn on X?
I have been using it for years and never saw any.

>>511043670 (OP)
He banned CP.

>>511043670 (OP)
Because there is in fact a difference between right and leftwing calls for porn banning.

>>511043670 (OP)
>Im Elon "Cyber Truck" Musk

>>511043670 (OP)
I only watch trad porn like Dad Crush or Shoplyfter

>>511045408
I don't like Musk and have not for many years, but I do appreciate that the cyber truck can out retarded consumerist cucks more effectively than any other vehicle on the road right now

>>511043670 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_zAlVv73HI

>>511043897
its usually spammed in replies, sometimes hidden by a "potential spam" filter. basically you need to lurk more.

>>511043828
This and can we pocket the christcuck stuff for a second and be honest... slutty sexually active women are what men actually want and porn is the way to satisfy that. An attack on porn is an attack on men, another attempt to make mens lives miserable to force them back to work and be slaves. Same goes with drugs, but I have to draw the line at biological urges, like cooming.

He's based? He's trying to get as many jeets imported as possible to lower his labor costs.

>>511043670 (OP)
>Collective shout

>>511043670 (OP)
Because he's a psychopathic zionist to entertaiin npc cattle like you

>>511043670 (OP)
Because he would lose even more of whoever is left on that shit web site.

>>511043897
Media tab, Hans.

>>511045717
>npc cattle
>nazi flag
fuck off kike

>>511043897
Go to
>settings
>Privacy
>Content you see (Uncheck the NSFW filter)
>Interests

From there uncheck all the SFW interests that are fucking up your algorithm and you'll start seeing it in no time

>>511043670 (OP)
>Collective Shout

>>511043897
OF girls post a lot of free content on Twitter.

>>511045750
jewish whore you're gonna pretend he's not a psychopath or a zionist?

>>511043828
didn't your court of some kind dictate that porn isn't speech?

>>511043897
it's taco tuesday, hans. go get your fill of tuna tacos.

Why does everyone say formerly twitter. Just say X.

>>511045704
They are experts on opposing the sexualisation of women

>>511046505
Just say Twitter because X is retarded

>>511046796
They're a feminist organization. That alone is enough for me to discard them as a gaggle of retards. They claim to be "experts on opposing the sexualisation of women" but from the feminist marches I've seen over the last few decades, feminists seem to want to sexualise themselves constantly while being allowed to berate others for staring.

>>511043828
Pornography is not speech and moreover terminates linguistic processing so what follows is no longer free speech but taxed speech vis-á-vis the reticular activating system shifting the brain to a state of sexual arousal whereby other parts of the brain. If you are sexually aroused, you lose interest and focus on the previous conversation. Even if one a priori does not consent to becoming aroused, the stimuli triggers arousal anyways no matter the wishes of the viewer impelling them to masturbate or spend the day distracted by horniness. This is facilitated by the prefrontal regions being desynchronized reducing their functioning so resistance to it is futile.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23356552/

Ergo, pornography is better considered anti-speech. It's not an expression of any higher part of the mind, and on the contrary shuts them down. It's trash and the only thing it furthers is reinforcement of sexual behavior which explains why everyone is gooning and always on the dating apps and can't go a day without sex. It also makes women more powerful because the same sexual response the coomer has will be primed for them in real life making one aroused and less prone to rational behavior, which explains all the simping.

>>511047902
>not watching for the plot

>>511046211
No.
Kill yourself.
This christcuck obsession is going to destroy the right wing in the west harder than ever before.
You should have at least waited another decade before going full mask off like this.

>>511043670 (OP)
Same reason he doesn't do something about all the bots and crypto scams. It's because Twitter is 90% Indians, and you know the jeets would chimpout if they could no longer watch bobs and vegana on Twitter.

>>511046796
they're a feminist troll group that are fucking salty that we'd rather stare at fictional characters breasts than engage with 3D pig disgusting slags.