>>511050181you're jewish and change definitions whenever it suits your argument, you're also lying, Hitler described exactly what you are doing in his lovely book
>The more I debated with them the more familiar Ibecame with their tactics in debate. At the outset they
counted upon the stupidity of their opponents; but when they
got so entangled that they could not find a way out, they
played the trick of acting the innocent simpleton. Should
they fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they
could not understand the counter-arguments and feeling
themselves cornered, hastily transferred the discussion to
another field. They uttered truisms and platitudes; and, if
you accepted these,took this acceptance as applying to other
problems and matters differing essentially from the original
theme. If you cornered them on this point they would escape
again, and you could not force them to make any precise
statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of
these apostles, one's hand grasped only a slimy jelly which
slipped through the fingers, but coagulated again a moment
afterwards. If your arguments were so telling that your
adversary felt forced to give in on account of those listening
and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground,
a surprise was in store for you on the following day. The
Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the
day before, and he would start once again by repeating his
former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. Should you
become indignant and remind him of yesterday’s defeat, he
pretended astonishment and could not remember anything,
except that on the previous day he had proved that his
statements were correct. Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I
do not know what amazed me the more—their quickness in
repartee or the artful way in which they dressed up their
falsehoods. I gradually came to hate them.
