Anonymous
(ID: RFDoryvs)
7/22/2025, 6:15:28 PM
No.511057866
[Report]
>>511058049
U.S. law limits how many green cards can be issued to nationals of any single country in a given fiscal year.
No more than 7% of the total number of green cards in a category (family-based or employment-based) can go to nationals of any one country (regardless of population).
According to the most recent VISA bulletin, the backlog on jeets applying for employment based adjustment is 12 years - EB-2/EB-3 categories. The system is clearly being abused by jeets. Is it time to flush the poo?
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2025/visa-bulletin-for-july-2025.html
Anonymous
(ID: qKnGDdgV)
7/22/2025, 6:16:06 PM
No.511057909
[Report]
>>511058562
>>511059819
By restricting immigration, the government directly intervenes in labor supply, artificially making it scarce resulting in inflated labor costs.
Anti-immigration is anti-free market. If you don't support the unconditional free flow of labor and capital you're literally a communist.
Anonymous
(ID: rN1xBrmZ)
7/22/2025, 6:24:53 PM
No.511058562
[Report]
>>511057909
It's ok to be a racist commie.
Anonymous
(ID: g9UX7YJv)
7/22/2025, 6:41:35 PM
No.511059819
[Report]
>>511057909
Based commies. Pools closed, 3rdies. Get the FUCK out and stay out fiveever.
Anonymous
(ID: RFDoryvs)
7/22/2025, 6:49:42 PM
No.511060433
[Report]
>>511062216
Overall EB Green Cards (FY2023):
India (14.5%)
China (13.4%)
Philippines (8.3%)
Brazil (7.1%)
South Korea (4.9%)
The 7% Per-Country Cap Is a Baseline, Not a Hard Ceiling
No country can receive more than 7% of family- or employment-based green cards unless there are unused visas from other countries.
How India Gets More Than 7%
When some countries don’t use all their allocated visas, the leftover visas are redistributed — and they go to countries with the highest demand and longest backlogs.
Anonymous
(ID: mzNttA3G)
7/22/2025, 7:10:26 PM
No.511061904
[Report]
>>511062222
Wow not a lot of brown people flooding this thread and talking shit
Anonymous
(ID: RFDoryvs)
7/22/2025, 7:14:41 PM
No.511062216
[Report]
>>511060433
Making the 7% a hard ceiling would be a step in the right direction to trim the number of jeets. If nobody wants to come but jeets, does it mean we will be receiving 100% jeets?
Anonymous
(ID: XghOAbez)
7/22/2025, 7:14:48 PM
No.511062222
[Report]
>>511061904
that's most this this entire board: angry brown shitskin fuming about white country he invaded unwelcomely