FYI women just released a "tea" app that acts as a database of every male online dating app profile where they can anonymously post the "problems" these men had when they were with them

it's currently #1 on the app store
and luckily, as the #MeToo movement showed, women never ever ever ever ever lie or exaggerate so this won't possibly backfire

They will sort by redflags and the hottest guys will be at the top of the list.
This is ironic. Female deception. They say they hate the men that they can't stop fucking no strings attached. They refuse to fuck "good men" on principle.

>>511072496 (OP)
BRING BACK COALFAX

>>511072496 (OP)
Still waiting for real women to be, themselves, released.

>>511072496 (OP)
We need to create an app called
>bodycount
Men then shit talk women
Discuss which of them are whores
Men can tell each other who’s wife was a massive whore or is cheating

Female empowerment at the hands of corporations for the purpose of higher consumer spending and lower labor wages is killing the entire west and nobody cares. If we released this app the UN and the American Congress would be calling for it to be banned tomorrow. Women cannot be criticized or judged in the same way men can, there will not be equality until their social value in society is slamdunked back to nothing. They cannot be trusted with power they are too self interested, solipsistic, and hypocritical.

>>511072496 (OP)
So should I start using the dating apps now if my online footprint is non existent?

>>511072496 (OP)
Right, but if men do this to women then it's misogyny.

>>511073642
FUCKING DO IT MATE. create.ai is your fucking opening to you or others... inb4 shilling, i just don't have the fucken time anymore. Also, be sure to shit up the app in OP, albeit methinks it's a nothingburger by another 1pbtid jeetbot to brownpill.

bruh how can it now be socially acceptableto upload someone's info to a service without their consent

>>511072496 (OP)
Women only fuck Chad.
Create list of all the Chads.
Women exclude all Chads.
They really can't ever be happy. They really are all going to die single, childless and alone, there is no other future for them.
This is... Gratifying.

>>511072496 (OP)
I wanna go on there and spread positive misinformation on every guy that comes up e.g. "This guy saved some orphans from a burning building the other day," "That guy builds prosthetics for paraplegic kittens in his spare time," etc.

>>511075964
They don't give a shit. Only looks matter.

>>511076115
This. It's not real. If women cared about positive qualities they wouldn't be fucking these guys. All this thing would end up being if it became popular(it wont) is a way for girls to brag to each other about how hot the guys are they fucked.

imagine caring what a bitch thinks

>>511072496 (OP)
Oh so they can have this but we can't have coalfax or nigger neighborhood avoiding apps? When will people get it you have to end the people making legislation against you?

>>511075059

Thanks for sharing.

Good genes correlate with each other.
Attractive people have better personalities because better personalities acquire more attractive mates and vice versa.

>>511076544
Meant for >>511076115

>>511072496 (OP)
Uninstall the jewish date apps
Take the rape pill

>>511072496 (OP)
and we cant have coalfax

>>511073642
>>511074800
we already made coalfax newfags

>>511072496 (OP)
We did it Teasisters!

>>511072496 (OP)
If I were a woman I would purposefully red flag every guy I was interested in to keep other girls away.

>>511073028
I love and appreciate you, russiafag. I always on the lookout for your post in any woman thread. May your prayers be answered and your future days blessed by women with tails.

>>511072698
Women suck, ask Bill boy

>>511076718
Coalfax is weak and not optically sound. You give them ground by being openly racist from the start. Shit was garbage and still is. The shitty revenge porn site that got shut down nearly instantly once the female tears rolled in was better. Nothing here is effective and is only moderately funny which is the main difference between /pol/ now and 4chan then.

>>511072496 (OP)
One word as solution: rape
>thrown to jail because it's crime
catch-22: what is false rape accusation. might as well enjoy the pussy instead of being empty-handed. Death penalty, won't un-rape her back.

I really, really, really, REALLY, really don't care about women anymore, bros

>>511072496 (OP)
Seems like a stupid idea. They are going to get raped with slander and libel lawsuits since there will be more vindictive bullshit on there than actual helpful information that help women date.

>>511072496 (OP)
Who cares almost all adult women are hoes only virgins are worth your time

If you mass reporting it like jewjeets and women do then they will remove it, if not then class action sue the broads who made it and give me 45% for doing your thinking for you.

>>511076115
This. The Golden rule for women is the more attractive you are, the less rules there are. Women don't hate being hit on at the gym or at work, they don't hate men catcalled them. And they certainly don't hate being called whores or sluts. They only hate when unattractive men do it. That's all there is to it. When you're attractive, there are less rules. Hell if you're good looking enough, you can walk up to a woman at a bar and outright ask her if she wants to get bent over in a fucking alley.
You know what the difference is between confidence and arrogance? Shy and awkward? Flirty and creepy? Looks. If she thinks you're attractive, you can do no wrong. If she doesn't, you can do no right.

>>511072496 (OP)
>make profile for myself
>pretend to be multiple fake women absolutely seething at myself
>make up wild stories about how horrible I am
>roasties see this and assume it means I have good dick and hoes mad
>finally get laid

ITS HAPPENING

>an app full of women giving women dating advice
Jesus fucking Christ how horrific. Women give absolutely horrendous advice to each other. This will only make things worse for women. Chad will see no difference.

>>511077629
Holy shit that's genius. Women are ridiculously susceptible to herd mentality. If they see some dude, even if he's average looking, generate a lot of buzz and strong feelings one way or the other, they'll want to try it for themselves.

>>511072926
Cant. Too incel.

It's an absolutely necessary app. Too many violent werdoes out in the wild.

>>511072496 (OP)

This type of app can be sued into bankruptcy in the EU.

How is it legal?

>>511072496 (OP)
App makes you take a selfie to verify you are a woman. Seems discriminatory.

>>511078016
>tranny takes a selfie
>gets denied

>>511077669
These women will create toxic profiles on men to keep other women away and give bad advice to women to sabotage them.

>>511078111
KEK

Does it sort by race or nah

>>511072496 (OP)
that is of absolutely no consequence to me, since I don't date to begin with.
that being said, they'll ignore the advice on there anyway.
it's not like they don't know that shitbags are shitbags, they are just attracted to shitbags and no amount of good advice can keep them away from them.

>>511078524
>that is of absolutely no consequence to me, since I don't date to begin with.
Whaddyado then?

>>511072698
>They say they hate the men that they can't stop fucking no strings attached.
Pretty much.
Never listen to people's words, unless those words match up with their actions.
I can say fucking anything and it costs me nothing, only actions have a real price attached.
And women's actions are basically the exact opposite of their words.

>>511078524
so I can go in there, post billions of red flags on my own profile via several sockpuppet accounts, and start drowning in pussy?

>>511076115
Pretty much. Women treated me like human garbage back when I was a scrawny nerd in HS.
Started lifting afterwards and got /fit/ (not for women because I already hated them at that point), and they couldn't stop themselves from begging for my attention afterwards.
The only time it would ever not be about looks is when you are loaded with money.

>>511077451
This anon gets it. I know this to be true because I seem to straddle the line between those two points. Some women find me attractive while others run for the hills. I've been told that I look like I'm about to drag them into an alleyway and rape them by both groups, the only difference being the group that finds me attractive adds a line like, "and I like that" at the end of it.

At first I thought the two groups would be delineated by their relative levels of attractiveness, however, as I approached more women and got more data, that turned out to be false. I've had objective 3s turn tail and run (well, waddle might be a better term for some of them) and have also had some of the hottest girls I've met be all over me.

It's fucking bizarre to me, since I'd say I'm decidedly average (5 foot 10 40 year old that can't seem to shake the weight around my middle) . I've tried asking them why but I almost always get non answers that make zero sense, so I don't even bother anymore. The closest thing I ever got to an answer was one girl telling me it was my eyes, that they immediately made her think that I was looking at her like she was prey.

tl;dr: Women are fucking retarded.

>>511072496 (OP)
More unbelievable cruelty from women, brought to you by yet another jewish social app

>>511074800
>albeit methinks it's a nothingburger by another 1pbtid jeetbot to brownpill
Wrong

>>511078524
Not gonna save your name from being dragged through it:
Women look up and gossip about people they are not dating too. They are scum.

>>511077451
>You know what the difference is between confidence and arrogance? Shy and awkward? Flirty and creepy? Looks.
Exactly. And that's also why it's so fucking retarded when unattractive people are given advice like
>Just be more confident, bro!
Actually, don't. Because being confident will be seen as arrogant if you're unattractive, and then rather than being ignored, you draw all their spiteful attention and they'll try to fuck you over to punish you for your transgressions.

You can even try it yourself to figure out of it's true.
If you're attractive, copy some of the behavior of someone who is unattractive and see how it suddenly gets interpreted in a positive rather than a negative way.
If you're unattractive, copy the behavior of some Chad who harvested the giggles with his comments and see how it will only reap you looks of disgust.

Men will do the same to some degree obviously, but men can also still see value in someone who is ugly.
Women can't really. Either you are attractive, then you're a good person and no rules apply, or you're not and then you should stop existing.

>>511079376
there are no online profiles for me. there is no material they could slap on there.
I despise women so I keep my interactions with them to a minimum.

>>511079554
Based uncle Ted.

>>511072496 (OP)
>every male online dating app profile
only fags use dating apps

>>511079757
No other way to meet people in 2025.

>>511072496 (OP)
I saw holes on Tiktok bitching how their fellow foids discover that some Chad is a player on AWDTSG, and still go for him 99% of the time.
Vaginas cannot resist Chad Thundercock.

BTW, these groups were implicated in at least 1 murder:

> Calvin Wang divorced his cheating whore of a wife for cheating.
> She kept stalking him.
> She kept posting him on AWDTSG to find if he is dating again.
> When she found out that he was, she lied that he was a cheater.
> Then she came to his home and shot him twice.
> He died.

Imagine if there was a male group/app like this that murdered a foid.

> Greetings from Kazakhstan!

>>511072496 (OP)
Womenreleased nothing, this is an obese guy gig and he beat me to it, cheeky devil

>>511075059

I'm fairly sure it's also illegal. At least here there are technically strict laws surrounding storing and sharing personal info beyond those people's explicit consent. Also, an app like this one is few slander lawsuits away from bankrupting

>>511072496 (OP)
>are we dating the same man
yes, you are, his name is chad. you`re going to find out he`s a serial manwhore with a dozen other women on the go, many hotter than you are. and you`re going to fuck him anyways.

if i had autism powers i`d be half inclined to review bomb every chad account i see with negative reviews. you could review bomb every beta account with positive reviews but it wont matter, women arent even looking at the bottom 93% of men anyways.

and by women i mean white women. not sure the other races women have become this delusional.

>>511072698
true. women pretty much exist to reward bad behavior.

>>511072496 (OP)
>women need an app optimization like 2010 WOW just to date
meanwhile
>men "she has pussy"

>>511083482
>if i had autism powers
You obviously do.

>>511083482
amendment to the above post

make sure any review bombing of chad isnt about aggression or abuse or bad behaviour since women reward those negatives with more sex. say things like "he`s too clingy" or "he gave me the ick" or "he has a green text bubble because he doesnt have an iphone, ewww" or "he has no friends" or "is bedroom is covered in anime posters" stuff like that

>>511083886
i only have the power of noticing
i can`t code for shit

>>511083482
men aren't known for being the visually appealing gender. plus women have options with makeup and all that, while men can comb their hair and maybe shave or not.

I just tried to download it and the App store doesn’t have it. Presumably not yet available in Ireland? Or does my phone know that I’m a man, and thus prevents me from getting near it?

>>511083988
that doesn`t matter. the point is they don`t know what the average actually is. they rate men who are 8s as 5s and men who are 5s as 2s. the chart should show the average as 5 with a precise mathematical distribution like how men rate women.

>>511072496 (OP)
now do this for women

>>511072496 (OP)
People who use this app are retarded. Stay away from people with abundant levels of retardation. It only makes your life worse.

>>511072496 (OP)
downloaded it, it literally asks for a picture and needs jannie approval to prove you are a woman lol
>durr it's not sexist when we do it?!?!?!
ik

>>511084257
men are ugly. deal with it. it doesn't have to meet your mathematical predeterminations

>>511072496 (OP)
Women will go to any lengths to not have to deal with themselves.

>>511072698
This. "Red flag" guys incite the most emotional stimulation through drama, which is what women absolutely fucking need.

>>511075059
How is there an entire wiki dedicated to documenting Chris Chan? It is the same idea. If it is public info it is no limits.

>>511072496 (OP)
Slander lawsuits

>>511075059
>tfw you never read a single ToS in the last 25 years

>>511073642
we had coalfax but jews went into deathcon 5 to shut it down

>>511078646
Prostitution is legal in Germany, unlike our faggot country.

>>511084682
men are rated relative to other men, women rated relative to other women.

i don`t think you understand the chart. even with men being ugly in general, even if men were all gross balls of pus and slime monsters, the average should still be in the middle, the chart should still look the way men rate women. that it doesn`t means women are delusional and think 93% of men are below average relative to other men and thats not what the word average means

>>511079413
I honestly tell my friends to just work on themselves and act with complete confidence. Because a woman is either going to find you attractive or not, so you might as well just do what you wanna do and say what you wanna say. She'll either eat it up or deny you immediately, and you'll have your answer then and there.

>>511084948
And they trafficked whites to be raped by shitskins.

>>511072496 (OP)
Women are too fucking pampered by society. I don’t even have a dating profile and this is making me cringe

>>511072496 (OP)
>it's currently #1 on the app store
You realize it's just a bunch of 40 year olds bitching right?

>>511072496 (OP)
>it's currently #1 on the app store
but they shutdown coalfax
>>511073028
>Still waiting for real women to be, themselves, released.
with a tail, naturally I suspect.

>>511081234
It's always funny to me when they have these things like "AWDTSG". The intent is to catch cheaters and dissuade women from being with them, but in reality all it does is display men with the ability to play multiple women into the world and give them a practically passive income for more female attention.

>>511072496 (OP)
Can we get an app for used up women covered in tattoos and drowning in debt?

>>511085026
they didn't ask for them to be averaged, they just asked if they were found to be attractive or not. there was no scale involved.
it might be men might take the question as where on a 1-10 scale would you put them while women are just taking it face by face.

>>511072496 (OP)
Seems to be limited to apple users. Chad Android continues to be unaffected.

>>511085027
>a woman is either going to find you attractive or not
>>511085307
>it might be
that's it. women make a yes or no judgement while guys use a sliding scale.
mars and venus

>>511085307
>>511085449
THE LAW OF AVERAGES, MUTT
DO YOU KNOW HOW IT WORKS?

>>511072496 (OP)
That’s fine with me. I gave up on women a long time ago. Enjoy your holes boys

>>511084738
Women actually like men with feminine personality disorders

>>511085488
most women will initially not be interested in most men so you get more "less attractives". simple as. while a guy will say things like, she's worth a pump and dump, or she's wife material etc. guys use a sale and women do yes or no.

>>511081234
> The documents also state that they’re using Christina’s phone as evidence, which she said contains text exchanges between her and Calvin before he died. She also said she typed a message to their 6-year-old son asking for forgiveness, the search warrant states.
Sick bitch.

>>511085627
I wouldn't necessarily call it a feminine personality disorder, since women have absolutely no control over their emotions at all. A man that has no control over himself will cry and break shit all the time and would quickly be thrown in prison if he had the mindset of a woman.

>>511085296
Neither should be disqualifications.

>>511085488
It just means they think "average" is bad.

>>511085307
they were asked to rate men on a seven point scale of least attractive to most attractive. how are you not understanding this? attractive relative to other men obviously or the rating is nonsensical.

if you were asked to rate possums on a scale of least attractive to most attractive would you rate every possum as 2/10 because possums are ugly? no you would rate most average looking possums as 5 because thats the average, thats what average means, and you`re rating the possums relative to other possums obviously or you are beyond fucking retarded and dont even understand the assignment.

>be me
>don't date
>will never show up on one of these apps
>whores who use them will treat me as lesser than verified cheaters and abusers because no social credit score is worse than low social credit score

thank god i'd never even consider breaking my celibacy to date a woman retarded enough to use such an app.

>>511085934
There's no other way to meet people since no one leaves their house anymore.

>>511079413
>Just be more confident
Bro its that easy

>>511085930
It's pretty much if you show me 100 pictures of women, 90 of them are fat and disgusting, 5 of them are ok, and the remaining 5 are gorgeous, you can extract from that that I believe 90% of them are unattractive. Not that they're some kind of new average.

>>511072496 (OP)
Women are incapable of original thought.

>>511085627
This

>>511073642
Don't bother.

The opposite of love isn't hate, it's indifference.

The solution to women creating police state apps is to completely remove your identity from the internet, and to ensure that no one has photos of you.

Disappear completely.

>>511085930
>the rating is nonsensical
this
women don't view mating the same way as men.

>>511072496 (OP)
when every man's bad, no one is. if all women pick up this app, it might just save the west.

>>511086204
LEAST attractive to MOST attractive
relative to what? if your rating isn`t relative to anything it doesn`t make any fucking sense. even if you think 90% of women are fat and disgusting then you give the fat and disgusting women a 5 because they`re the average.

maybe you`re right and thats how every woman answered. in a retarded nonsensical way where nothing is relative to anything else. in which case they`re not just delusional, which can be somewhat forgiven, but they`re literally retarded and should not be allowed to vote or drive or hold a bank account or have a job or even be allowed outside without male supervision. i`m a misogynst but even i dont think women are as retarded as you`re suggesting. i think theyre just delusional about what the average is

how many anons do fake reviews?

>>511084257

The very assumption of your argument is that male attractivness follows the normal curve. However, if it doesn't, If male attractivness is skewed towards the ugly side the women are grading men correctly.

You're seething because women are not grading men the way you want them to but have literally no reason to say it should follow the perfect bell curve. Like, phyisical attractivness is subjective, there is no objective way to prove the male distribution should be a normal one.

If this is how male attractivness is percieved then it's how male attractivness is.

Especially when you consider that a similar graph which would compare the effort men and women put in their appearence would be reversed, with women putting much, much more effort in their clothes, photo editing, make up, cosmetic treatments, hairstyles etc. Most men just take a random photo where they have a clean shirt and expect women to drool over them. Because grooming is for faggots and they are all alpha males entitled to high quality pussy

Don't take my word for it, play with tinder settings to see straight female and straight male photos, with 90% of male photos being "a guy in a t-shirt".

You might as well complain about grading of trannies not following the bell curve like it does for women

>>511072496 (OP)
This is gonna get infested with trannies for the lulz

>>511086572
You're assuming women are actually going to not only take good advice, but give good advice. This app isn't to filter out men that play women, this app is for women to find "red flag guys" that a lot of other women have fucked, so they can fuck them too.
Women absolutely require social proof. If you surround an average guy with beautiful women fawning over him, other women will suddenly think higher of him. This is because he is pre-selected. If other women find him attractive, he must have overcome all of their hurdles to get there, so he's essentially completed 75% of the battle before even talking to a new woman.
This app is just going to have a bunch of women tell other women "yeah we all fucked this guy" which will make anyone that hasn't fucked him intrigued.

>>511086780
they are asked to rate between LEAST attractive and MOST attractive

LEAST RELATIVE TO WHAT?
MOST RELATIVE TO WHAT?

RELATIVE TO OTHER MEN!!!!
or the question makes no fucking sense at all

>>511072698
This, top kek!

>>511085769
That's exactly how faggots with NPD act though

>>511086605
>but they`re literally retarded and should not be allowed to vote or drive or hold a bank account or have a job or even be allowed outside without male supervision
Well yeah, pretty much.
>i think theyre just delusional about what the average is
Women operate on a "hot or not" scale, not a 1-10 like guys do. If you showed them 100 men that men consider "average", they'll say no to a good 95% or more of them.

>>511085769
>>511087057
Our prison systems are filled to the brim with niggers who were exclusively raised by single woman. Take that how you will.

>>511087068
well the question was to rate men on a 1/7 scale of most attractive or least attractive. even if you think 90% of men are ugly then you should still rate most of the men 5 because its relative to other men not relative to... nothing at all. the words most and least imply a relative relation.

They'll rightly get sued into oblivion just like every previous attempt at this. Best of luck in securing early retirement gents.

>>511086780
>seething because women are not grading men the way you want them to
If women don't understand averages and a bell curve then birthrates plummet and most women will die alone to be eaten by their cats. The experiment of women having rights will eventually end.

>>511073642
Honestly
Just accelerate cuz I find it funny

>>511086910

Relative to their own fucking preferences retard, they're grading men from "I would fuck him in front of my parents" to "I wouldn't touch him with a flame torch". It's perfectly valid to overwhelmingly put men to the "unfuckable" side. If you had this sort of test for entire male sex globally it would be even more skewed due to literal billions of jeets and shitskins being deemed unfuckable. In fact I'd be surprised if the "epidemic of male loneliness" isn't largely caused by mass imigration of skinny / fat / smelly / brown manlets, bringing the average down in western countries


Subjective grading doesn't have to follow the bell curve and in fact it often doesn't if it's not rooted in objective measurement criteria. That's the entire reason why the term "grade inflation" exists.

>>511086328
Unfathomably based truke

>>511072926
Hoefax can't exist either in a gynocentric society.

>>511072496 (OP)
>women just released
It's made by a gay Philadelphian man in San Francisco who was inspired by the stories his divorced mom told him about her incredibly shitty dating life.

>>511073642
That's the thing you can't. Because it will be banned. There was a website that tracked mudsharks but it was quickly banned because it was a invasion on privacy. Can you believe it? This app is totally fine, but that was bad. It's a rotten system this misandric society we are living in.

>>511072496 (OP)
whats stopping someone from just botting accounts on this?

>>511073642
Seems there already is desu
Right below the OP’s app in Lifestyle

>>511087250
That's sorta my point. These men weren't ever exposed to healthy masculinity, only unhealthy femininity if you can even call it that since it appears to be moreso an unhealthy attempt at masculinity from a woman. They never understood the point that as a man, you have a responsibility to control your emotions. A man that can't control his emotions at best is a pussy that's pushed around and at worst a literal murderer that'll probably die in prison.

>>511087438
that doesn`t make sense. relative to your own preferences? what? that wasn`t the question.

if you think spiders are ugly and i ask you to rate a bunch of spiders between a and 7 do you give them all a 1?

if you`re right and thats how women approached the question then they are fucking retarded and shouldn`t have rights. they are basically alien retards and dont understand human logic and reason in a way that is not compatible with life on earth

>>511087671
>>511087671
>whats stopping someone from just botting accounts on this?
app onboarding process requires a selfie to prove you're a woman

>>511087647
>divorced mom told him about her incredibly shitty dating life.
>venting to your child about your dating life
Why are women so shit at parenting by themselves? The amount of times i've seen them treat young boys like proto husbands or have them make adult decisions for them is ridiculous

>>511072496 (OP)
can someone with the app installed look up what they are saying about me? my name is Hasan Piker

>>511087253
They imply that for sure, but that's not how a woman's brain will operate. If you ask her this, in her mind she will consider "attractive" to be a 10/10 man, and from 10/10 it becomes a "yes/no".
It's absolutely retarded but this is how their brains work. If you asked a man, he would imagine a 10, but then acknowledge that there's still 8s, 5s, 1s, and everything else. For women, it's a yes/no question. Pretty much to answer what you said before, yes, they are simply that retarded.

>>511087780
That's trivial to produce thanks to AI and google

If necessary I could literally take a photo of a random woman on the street.

You can't be serious lol, this is going to be botted to hell and back

>>511087273

You're the one not understanding distributions retard and why subjective, sociological ones don't have to follow the same proportions as material, objective ones

Also, human population has been dramatically lower through most of history and genetic studies show majority of men didn't get to breed. In fact, wars were largely how societies dealt with surplus of undesirable men

Also

> Oh boo hoo why don't men UNDERSTAND linear correlation, by not finding women fuckable after they lose their eggs - while women find men fuckable as long as they're fertile

> men are stupid and are responsible for female post-wall loneliness epidemic™

>>511072496 (OP)
>currently #1 on the app store
which one
>THE app store

>>511077230
Are you stupid? There are already numerous facebook groups for only women to ask "are we dating the same guy" where plenty of dudes get slandered and dragged through the mud, they have been operational for years. Years. This is simply an app that does the same so it's more organized. Nobody cares bro, shits is already truly fucked. I even think there was a dude trying to sue the people who created a facebook group where he was slandered by a rejected bitter cunt, but the creators could constantly deject responsibility so there is no one to actually sue.

>>511087789
Because women, despite what they claim, absolutely need men to have a semblance of mental stability. They're too wishy washy to actually hold down lifelong friendships with any consistency, so the only thing they can rely on to emotionally comfort them is their man. And when they don't have that, the only relationship that cannot go away is with their children or their parents. The child though is ever-present. So the child will become a quasi therapist to the mother. Or more of an emotional tampon, since she has nowhere else to go.

>>511072698
>They refuse to fuck "good men" on principle

>>511079554

>>511075956
>>511072496 (OP)

Only chads will be listed.
Mid and beta males wont ever be posted.

>>511072496 (OP)
this doesnt affect me at all

>>511072496 (OP)
Why don't they get a husband and stop being cunts?

>>511087865
oh... wow that`s a blackpill
you can`t ask women to rate men relative to other men because they are mentally incapable of understanding the assignment.

>>511087896
if you are asked to rate a bunch of trannies from least to most attractive you`ll give the most passable tranny a 10 even if you don`t find him attractive. that`s how men think.

i think we are just seeing the divide between men and women in that men are rational and women can`t be rational because they`re retarded

>>511087735


> that doesn't make sense. relative to your own preferences? what? that wasn't the question

you're a jeet aren't you? Like, I refuse to believe blond Canadians have degenerated this much

> if you think spiders are ugly and i ask you to rate a bunch of spiders between a and 7 do you give them all a 1?

Yes, because objective attraction doesn't exist you retarded mongoloid. How else would I know to rate spider attractivness "objectively"? What are the "objective" measurements? Who gets to say? Do you think a man into fat chicks didn't put fat chicks above average? Or do you think he went by some "objective scale" where they are below average compared to skinny girls who he wouldn't fuck?

How do you even imagine this testing went, women were given 100 pics of men and asked to sort them by some objective alghoritm? Or they were shown pics one by one and asked to grade how much they're atttacted to them on a scale of 1-10?

>>511086862
that's a lot of assumptions on your part bud, not mine. widespread snitching and blacklisting destabilizes what is currently an inflated yet stable gyno-centric situation. destabilizing the current situation opens the opportunity for new situation.

>>511087789
>Why are women so shit at parenting by themselves?
By design

If you need a partner to stay grounded in the relationship, the relationship will stay together partly thanks to that need. It's a Good Thing (tm)

The real question is why did his mother stop being married

Seems like Sean would have said "after my father passed away" if it wasn't an obvious divorce situation

>>511088188
It's because "good men" are typically boring. Good, normal men do not have the absolutely brutality or experience required to keep a woman emotionally stimulated. And since relationships, for some reason, rely SOLELY on the volatile emotions of the woman, they see "good" as "weak and boring". The red flag men are drama incarnate. That drama emotionally stimulates them, and that sexually arouses them.
I truly believe there is no such thing as "good dick". I believe of a woman finds you attractive or arousing, you're already 75% of the way there to satisfying her sexually. This "Ron Jeremy" archetype of the ugly, short, disgusting creature with ridiculous sexual skills doesn't exist in reality.

>>511088535

No, if I were shown pics of trannies one by one and asked to rate them 1-10 how attractive do I find them I wouldn't pic any as being above 5 because I'm not into trannies. Same goes for most men.

>>511088549
you rate the spiders relative to other spiders or the question doesnt even make sense since all spiders are ugly

it was a scale of 1 to 7
and they looked at the profiles of men
and they could select LEAST attractive to MOST attractive. the words least and most imply in relative relation to other men. otherwise none of this makes any fucking sense at all.

>>511087896
>In fact, wars were largely how societies dealt with surplus of undesirable men
We 100% agree. Women find men ugly. Women won't breed enough because they think men are ugly. Conflict will be created. Women's ratings won't matter because in conflict they'll be raped and sold by the winners. Either women keep 80% of men happy or they get raped and owned by the 20%. What women want is irrelevant long term.

>>511088756
then you didn`t understand the assignment and you`re fucking retarded

>>511075059
>bruh how can it now be socially acceptable
pic related.. I think you mean 'legal' by 'socially acceptable'.. learn your own fucking language twat.


>>511085885
>Neither should be disqualifications
according to women.

>>511088756
>to rate them 1-10 how attractive do I find them
that wasnt even the question
it was to rate them least attractive to most attractive
obviously the most passable tranny gets a 10 or why even have a scale between 1 to 10 if there is no 10

>>511072496 (OP)
>Tea
Needs a counterpart BAG app...

>>511088535
>you can`t ask women to rate men relative to other men because they are mentally incapable of understanding the assignment
Bingo. They do not understand what that means. Men, even if they have their own preferences, will understand an average woman when they see one. They'll understand the average because they mentally will put it against the extremities and see it lies somewhere in the middle. Women however, see it solely as a "Yes/No". They'll imagine the hottest guy they can, and then ask "Is that guy as hot?". Now, obviously 90% of men won't be, but that's why women consider 90% of men as unattractive.

>>511088756
>because I'm not into trannies.
You're not a man or you're young and raised by a single mom. You're focused on your social place, and your weaknesses, versus any ability for the group to move forward.
>Same goes for most men.
The basis of being a man is objective shared truth. I don’t find redheads attractive but I can fairly rate them. Civilization collapses without this ability.

>>511075956
>>511072496 (OP)
It will result in purity spiralling due to hypergamy in women. So they eliminate all non Chads but now among the Chads 80% no longer count as a Chad so they ALSO get eliminated than the remaining chads get another 80% purged for no longer being a 'Chad' and so forth...

It's what you see in modern dating and online dating, but now most guys have realized the truth and given up. Even many Chads know they won't survive the next purge of 80% and simply cannot keep competing.

>>511072698
I know that most women won’t care but I do wonder if some roasties get redpilled by this and start questioning their life.

>>511086328
>The solution to women creating police state apps is to completely remove your identity from the internet, and to ensure that no one has photos of you.
Even that isn't guaranteed to work. I have no social media, never have, never posted any pictures of myself online. Was still nearly cancelled and doxxed by a random black woman whom I insulted after she provoked me past a breaking point.
She managed to take a video of me, posted it online and tried to get me doxxed and cancelled, but couldn't find me because my face literally didn't exist online, she even accidentally doxxed some other random guy who looked like me.
But eventually I got tattled on by a friend of my sister's, who recognized my face from the video and passed on my name to her.
I got a settlement lawyer, had it all taken down, but still. Shit is fucking bleak, my dudes.

Marija Gimbutas' matriarchal culture is becoming more real by the day and is going to fucking kill us all.

>>511087875
>That's trivial to produce thanks to AI and google

ok then do it faggot

btw when you download Sean's app he gets more famous and his app becomes more valuable

>>511088013
>There are already numerous facebook groups for only women to ask "are we dating the same guy" where plenty of dudes get slandered and dragged through the mud, they have been operational for years. Years.
>This is simply an app that does the same so it's more organized

no, it's an app because you can't "sell" a facebook group to a venture capitalists as a startup exit, but if you reimplement the facebook group as an "app" you can cashout and make $50 million shekels

>>511089082
i get it now. women are literally actually mentally retarded. i thought they were just delusional but this is way way worse.

>>511089082
>Women however, see it solely as a "Yes/No". They'll imagine the hottest guy they can, and then ask "Is that guy as hot?". Now, obviously 90% of men won't be, but that's why women consider 90% of men as unattractive.

#notallwomen are like this btw

>>511089475
according to the chart almost all of them are

>>511073642
Males have not sexual solidarity, they are happy to not disclose known whores, so they can fuck them while their best friend pay. Then they say "it was the girl fault that you wasted your time with her (even if I already knew)"

>>511072496 (OP)
"Im already pulled over! I cant pull over any farther!"

>>511072496 (OP)
Meanwhile sites like coalfox get dogpiled on and shut down, and roasties have been campaigning hard to get pimeyes + facecheck shut down as well so you can't check whether the whore you're dating is a camwhore

Matriarchy in action, folks

>>511089531
>according to the chart almost all of them are
are you talking about this chart? doesn't seem to say anything big dog, just that women like to date men who are closer to 30 years old than they are

>>511087896
no information on who made this chart or what the sample size is. was it Aella "Rachael Slick" Girl with one of her twitter orbiter surveys? what cohort?

>>511089475
Enough of them are to where however many aren't is a negligible number. There is practically nothing I can say that will objectively apply to every single woman down to the last individual. But I'll settle for it applying generally to practically all of them. Only women ever make this "NOT ALL OF US!!!" excuse.

>>511089475
>#notallwomen are like this btw
Maybe 5% aren't. Probably the same 5% that aren't on Facebook or IG. Maybe 20% of women are rational and suitable for marriage. At this point we need the Amish to save us or for the 5% to outbreed everyone else. It's bleak out there.

>>511089771
no, this chart >>511083482

>>511072698
Get a load of pic rel

Roasties are literal schizophrenics when it comes to mating behaviour, they've got a split personality disorder going thanks to their hormones constantly switching up 180 degrees during that time of the month

>>511089804
The only women rational and suitable for marriage are like that because of strong male influence. The amount of women that actually come to the right conclusion solely on their own is infinitesimal.

>>511072496 (OP)
95% of women don't use dating apps, and the ones that do are garbage tier trash women you wouldn't want to date anyway.
None of you faggots are actually meeting up with or having sex or going on dates or getting into relationships or having any sort of interaction with the garbage tier women on dating apps, so why would you even care? You are so irrelevant and sexless that women won't even have a reason to talk shit about you because no one even knows who you are.
Their girl group chats and "Are we dating the same guy" facebook groups already serve the same person that this app is going for, without all of shit integrating dating app profiles.
And it goes both ways. I have a pretty thick dick and every few months I'll fuck some chick and then suddenly start getting tons of unsolicited attention from random girls because apparently the one I fucked immediately started bragging to all of her friends about it. I had one chick take a selfie of us still in bed together the next day and sent it to her girl group chat and within a few minutes my phone was blowing up with messages from girls in the group lol.

>511089880
Note how the high "enemy" percentage correlates perfectly with chad tier facial attractiveness

Roasties love cluster B dark triard machivellian Chads

Roasties are using social media/apps to weed out the non-Chads and warn each other of "creepy" non-Chad men

Their goal is competing for the top 1% of men, and only White Shariah will put a stop to it

>>511089971
heh

>>511072496 (OP)
Roastie Skynet

>>511089880
>thanks to their hormones constantly switching up 180 degrees during that time of the month

doesn't that mean there's a window for every woman where you'd have a shot?

>>511089818
>no, this chart >>511083482
proves my point,

>>511089804
>Maybe 5% aren't. Probably the same 5% that aren't on Facebook or IG. Maybe 20% of women are rational and suitable for marriage. At this point we need the Amish to save us or for the 5% to outbreed everyone else. It's bleak out there.

>>511089796
>Enough of them are to where however many aren't is a negligible number. There is practically nothing I can say that will objectively apply to every single woman down to the last individual. But I'll settle for it applying generally to practically all of them. Only women ever make this "NOT ALL OF US!!!" excuse.

nobody in history except the most degenerate has ever married the entire distribution or the most average out of the distribution

i never understood the crybullying of women in these men's threads. why do you want to date the most statistically mid woman in the middle of the distribution?

why are you expending effort whingeing when you could be conquering and finding the best woman who adores you? do you feel entitled to just win automatically without trying?

it's amazing really

Jeetcel Thread! Let's fucking go!!!

>>511088768

How exactly would you differentiate a spider which is a 7 from a one which is an 8? I'm genuinelly curious and entertained by this point

>>511089116

There is no objective attractiveness you stupid fuck and no reason to assume the distribution would be normal even if it were. If majority of women would OBJECTIVELY rate bald men as unnatractive and you showed them a sample of 60% bald men you wouldn't get a normal distribution of their "objective attractiveness to women"

What you and the other 2 retards are talking about is RANKING a sample of men on objective criteria which isn't the task of "how would you rate these men one after the other in regards to how attractive you find them"

I'm off to bed I'm not wasting my time on low IQ jeets

>>511089971
>95% of women don't use dating apps, and the ones that do are garbage tier trash women you wouldn't want to date anyway.

and if you sign up for these apps you are joining the dead pool. there's literally no point

>None of you faggots are actually meeting up with or having sex or going on dates or getting into relationships or having any sort of interaction with the garbage tier women on dating apps, so why would you even care? You are so irrelevant and sexless that women won't even have a reason to talk shit about you because no one even knows who you are.

100%

>>511072496 (OP)
is this legal?
it's aggregating information on people who haven't agreed to the privacy policy and terms

>>511072698
>They refuse to fuck "good men" on principle.
You aren't actually a good man. You are really just LARPing and pretending to be a good, honorable, chivalrous, gentlemanly guy who conceals his true sexual intentions from women because you (wrongly) think this strategy will help you get into their panties. You see girls as nothing more than a means to your end goal of sex.
You aren't good at all, you are extremely morally corrupt and just being manipulative but failing because you are bad at it.
You seethe over all of this stuff because you were only pretending to be good because you thought it would eventually lead to you getting the girl. When that doesn't happen, you get supremely butthurt about all of the time and energy and effort you put into pretending to be nice and good that ended up being wasted.
I know that you aren't a truly good, honorable, chivalrous, gentlemanly guy, because a guy who was legitimately like that wouldn't seethe when those actions don't lead to sex, because that isn't why he was being like that.
Unlike you, Chad the asshole fuckboy is at least open and honest about his sexual intentions.

>>511072496 (OP)
so basically another platform where women lie to and backstab each other over men?

>>511090397
maybe he is a good man, you don`t know him.
you just made up a bunch of weird shit out of nowhere and pinned it on him

>>511085134
is that Eliot Rodger?

>>511072496 (OP)
Cool. Never used a dating app, never will.

>>511090326
I was wondering something similar. Defamation of character, slander, etc

>>511088768
They were only rating the men they saw on OKcupid, and comparing them to the men in the general population. The men who are desperate enough to actually resort to dating apps like OKcupid overwhelmingly tend to be the less attractive ones. The fact that they assessed most of the men on OKcupid to be below average makes perfect sense, because the men who use OKcupid ARE below average men.
Also, the 10 point isn't some based statistics or some autistically perfect distribution or anything like that.
The different numbers have different meanings, it's not like 7/10 means someone is in the 70th percentile or anything like that.

>>511080006
>> >every male online dating app profile
>> only fags use dating apps
> No other way to meet people in 2025.

TRUE if you never leave your basement

>>511090326
>is this legal?
Not in the EU.

>>511090172
>why do you want to date the most statistically mid woman in the middle of the distribution?
Because not everyone is Chad. In the 1950s the vast majority of women were marriage material. Most were kids. Most helped create a good family.
>conquering and finding the best woman who adores you?
There's few women I think much of. There's not much to conquer and little to be won.
>do you feel entitled to just win automatically without trying?
If most women are this retarded then civilization will collapse. They'll try to import jeets but even that will likely eventually fail. Because if average men are not entitled to average women with minimal effort then the men will give up. Men will vote for far more extreme politicians than Trump.

>>511090889
>>is this legal?
>Not in the EU.

hence why they only operate in USA

>>511089082
>Men, even if they have their own preferences, will understand an average woman when they see one.
Without googling, please describe the "Average Woman" in terms of age, height, weight, ethnicity, marital status, income, etc.
Or even just what you would consider reasonable, average, normal criteria for the kind of woman you want.

>>511072496 (OP)
Looks like we need to update and modernize coalfax

>>511090397
>pretending to be a good, honorable, chivalrous, gentlemanly guy who conceals
Only incels do this or say this. A modern good man does none of these or even tries. Are you a woman.
>think this strategy will help you get into their panties.
Being a dick is a far better strategy.
>You see girls as nothing more than a means to your end goal of sex.
This is all most are worth.

>>511090397
>You aren't actually a good man.
Stopped reading. Don't care.

>>511084882
QRD?

>>511090574
>maybe he is a good man, you don`t know him.
No, I know without a doubt that he is not, because a legitimate good man wouldn't be so upset about women refusing to fuck good men.
Truly good men are good men because that's who they are, not because they think it should result in pussy.
That anon is just LARPing as a good man, while is motivations for doing so are not good at all.

>>511090397
>retarded blathering
Ah yes the old
>I was right to treat him like shit even though he was a nice person because he was only being nice to have sex with me and secretly is actually definitely a very evil person thus retroactively justifying my actions in treating him like shit
>i can't lose teehee!

>hurr durr you only act polite and respectful because you expect others to treat you with respect in return!
>so ur not really polite and respectful!
>if you're a genuinely good person you have to keep being polite and respectful no matter how rude and cuntish everyone acts towards you in return!
>otherwise you were never really a good person!
What the fuck kind of retarded cunt logic is this? Stupid faggot.
Yes. When people accord themselves in a manner conducive to civilised society they expect others to show them the same treatment.
That's not ''''''entitlement''''' or ''''''not actually being a good person'''''. Fucking retard.

Let's say I have a nice, friendly, kind dog and I repay its behaviour by starving and kicking it repeatedly instead of giving it pets and treats.
It turns into an asshole dog that growls at me and bites me.
>HURR DURR SEE YOU WERE ONLY BEING NICE TO GET STUFF SO YOU WERE NEVER REALLY A GOOD DOG
>SO I WAS RIGHT TO KICK YOU
Woman logic
Kill yourself.

>>511090817
chads can get laid so easily with dating apps
non-chads get nowhere and give up and delete their accounts after swiping yes on a thousand plus women and getting nowhere. for chad a dating app is like uber eats for ordering sex. every chad i know is on tinder and meeting up with new chicks every week. this boomer assumption that only desperate loser ugly incels use dating apps is from the 1990s or some shit

>>511075964
That shit will make their pussies dry up like the Sahara desert.
Better to spread rumors about you being a serial killer.

>>511090936
>Because not everyone is Chad. In the 1950s the vast majority of women were marriage material. Most were kids. Most helped create a good family.
why are you so sure of this? you're telling me you don't believe you're Chad?

why live?

>>conquering and finding the best woman who adores you?
>There's few women I think much of. There's not much to conquer and little to be won.
see, there you assumed I was talking about conquering women, but I meant conquering the world kek

>>511090936
>Because if average men are not entitled to average women with minimal effort then the men will give up.
average men who go outside are entitled to average women who go outside. men who sit inside all day are not entitled to women

>>511090936
>If most women are this retarded then civilization will collapse.
picrel

>>511091322
>a legitimately good man wouldn't be upset about women rewarding awful criminal scum behaviour instead of decent society-building behaviour
How fucking retarded are you?
Anyone with a brain should be upset about that.

>>511072496 (OP)
Feels good to be an unloveable incel chud

>>511091374
It's still true. Remember we used to make fun of nerds? Now 90% of the populace is addicted to the internet. Lots of losers, especially on the dating apps. A new girl every week is nothing compared to having pussy and a warm meal every night.

>>511091322
>Truly good men are good men because that's who they are, not because they think it should result in pussy.

Men should only be motivated to pursue women because of chivalry and social respect and if wanting pussy ever remotely crosses their minds they are Literally Harvey Weinstein

meanwhile on the right

Men should literally only be pursuing women because sex is sacred under God. also it's totally fine to be a pedophile because teenage girls are genuinely hotter than adult women! This is all totally normal

>>511077629
Great minds think alike

>>511091322
>a legitimate good man wouldn't be so upset about women refusing to fuck good men.
Hon, we're talking about the collapse of western civilization in our lifetime. Any man, or man with children, should be very upset by these trends. Some will beat the odds and find a good wife but the vast majority won't.
>Truly good men are good men because that's who they are
These get friend zoned then abused by women. You want an incel simp.
>not because they think it should result in pussy.
Most men talk to you to see if you're dtf. You've got nothing else interesting to say. You want a simp then don't want to put out. Gtfo.

>>511091233
>A modern good man does none of these or even tries.
You don't do that stuff, but that's because you aren't actually the good man that you think you are.
>Are you a woman.
No, of course not. There are no women on the internet you retard. I denounce all roasties and feminism worldwide, and fuck the jews too.
>Being a dick is a far better strategy.
It is a more effective strategy to get laid, but the fact that you are thinking in terms of which strategies are best to manipulate girls into fucking you shows that you are far from being a good man.
>This is all most are worth.
Again proving my point that you aren't a good man.

>>511091644
>Remember we used to make fun of nerds? Now 90% of the populace is addicted to the internet.

every white person's favorite tap dancing Negro
> I would never live my life on a computer
> IG'll get you life for a chikabooya

>>511078111
Just say you're gender fluid.
If they deny you, sue.
Win-win.

>>511091453
>but I meant conquering the world kek
Did you just graduate high school.

>>511091074
we just know an average woman when we see one from having seen millions and millions of women over the course of our lives. for proof that men know what the average is just consult the perfect curve on this chart

This isn't /pol related

>>511078287
Women aren't smart enough to make up shit that would actually work, like "He cried about his dead dog. Ick!"

>>511077057
stfu, newfag. coalfax was funny, your idea isn't. go get your guy fawkes mask and protest on a corner somewhere you fucking queef

>>511091322
or maybe he has seen countless example of men who treat women like shit being rewarded with sex and it has made him bitter

>>511072496 (OP)
holy shit! women are fucking evil creatures!!!!! but coalfax was bad

>>511091819
>because you aren't actually the good man that you think you are.
Good men are labeled incel simps and treated that way by women. Modern good men don't hit their girl and don't bring a STD home. You're stuck in the 1950s. Don't ask for a 1950s "good man" if you're not a 1950s "good girl". You're on a board talking about sex and dating with men. We know you a ho.

>>511090397
>because i said so
Not an arguement, thats not how it works.

>>511075956
Only the top 10% of guys will even be on this. The ugly guys won't even register for the women. So it's gonna be the guys that fuck these women then can't deal with their shit or just treat them as what they are: whores.

>>511091233
>incels this incels that
Either feral turdworlder or batshit insane leftist.

>>511091819
>you aren't actually the good man that you think you are.
And thats not up to you to decide.

>>511091368
>When people accord themselves in a manner conducive to civilised society they expect others to show them the same treatment.
Being polite and respectful to other people and then expecting them to treat you with respect in return is NOT at all the same as acting polite and respectful to other people because you think it will lead to them fucking you, and then being all butthurt because she decided to fuck someone else.
>That's not ''''''entitlement''''' or ''''''not actually being a good person'''''.
No, that is exactly what it is. You think the fact that you were superficially nice and polite to a girl means that you should be entitled to sex with her. You think she owes it to you.
Someone who is nice to other people because they actually are a good person doesn't have this mindset you have at all. Unlike you, they weren't just being nice because they thought that it would eventually lead to some kind of transactional reward for them. The truly good person was being nice because they are a good person, not because they were trying to get something from the other person.
>Let's say I have a nice, friendly, kind dog and I repay its behaviour by starving and kicking it repeatedly instead of giving it pets and treats.
No one ever did anything like starving or kicking you. A girl not wanting to fuck you even though you acted nice to her is not mean or cruel or wrong. A girl deciding to fuck some other guy instead of you is not mean or cruel or wrong.
>It turns into an asshole dog that growls at me and bites me.
You were always the asshole, you were just being dishonest and concealing your true intentions and purposes for being nice. You were never truly nice or friendly or kind because you motivation for acting that way was always morally corrupt.

>>511092573
>acting polite and respectful to other people because you think it will lead to them fucking you,
nobody does this. its a fantasy boogieman you made up.
>You think the fact that you were superficially nice and polite to a girl means that you should be entitled to sex with her.
nobody thinks this

whats happening is that nice guys, actually guys that are just nice, are looked down on by women. while guys that act like aggressive psychopaths have no trouble getting laid. thats all. all that shit you made up about men feeling entitled to sex is mythical nonsense

>>511092183
>rewarded with sex
Again, the fact that you think of it in these terms just shows how morally corrupt and retarded you are.
Imagine being at a bar or party or some other similar kind of social event. And some cute girl approaches you and strikes up a conversation. She's being flirty and laughing at all of your jokes and finding reasons to touch you and all of that.
And after a while, she asks if you will buy her a drink, and you do. Then as soon as she has it, she says that she is going back over to hangout with her boyfriend.
Would you be upset by that? Do you think her behavior in pretending to be interested in you just to get something out of you is "good" because she was doing nice things to you in a superficial way?

There was a site like this before called "Woman Savers" it was a bit cumbersome, but did much the same thing. I bet this app will be 1million times better.

>>511092573
>acting polite and respectful to other people because you think it will lead to them fucking you
My polite and respectful is worth a coffee date. If you ask for more I expect to later see your head down and ass up. It's not polite or respectful to lead a man on past $10 or 30 minutes.
>you were superficially nice and polite to a girl means that you should be entitled to sex with her.
If she took anything including my time without bring truthful with her intentions then that's on her.
>they weren't just being nice because they thought that it would eventually lead to some kind of transactional reward for them.
Women constantly do this. You've described most women.
>The truly good person was being nice because they are a good person
This rarely ends without someone being taken advantage of.
>You were never truly nice or friendly or kind because you motivation for acting that way was always morally corrupt.
This is exactly how we feel about most modern women.

>>511092537
>And thats not up to you to decide.
I am not deciding anything, just stating the undeniable facts.
If a guy is being nice, polite, respectful to women just because he thinks it will somehow result in him getting pussy, then he is objectively NOT a good man. He is morally corrupt and just trying to be manipulative. The fact that he constantly fails because he is retardedly trying to use such an ineffective, obsolete strategy doesn't mean that his attempt to be manipulative was any less bad or corrupt than when it is when some Chad dirtbag says all kinds of bullshit to women to manipulate them into sex but it actually works.

>>511072496 (OP)
women are obsessed with men
men quiet quit the dating scene
women spend their days scrolling tik toks of single women giving advice on finding men
we are not the same

>>511093121
asshole men get laid because they`re assholes
everyone has noticed this
yes, they are being rewarded with sex for being terrible people

meanwhile women cant tell the difference between a man wanting something and feeling entitled to it. because women feel entitled to everything they want.

if a man is nice to a woman, while at the same time hoping for sex, not expecting it but hoping. its not the same as a man being nice to a woman because he thinks being nice will get him sex. no man thinks being nice will get him laid, nobody thinks that. we want to be nice because we are nice, and we lament that being nice puts us at a disadvantage.

>>511077057
>You give them ground by being openly racist from the start.
cuck faggot

>>511072496 (OP)
LOL all 10 guys they actually date will be on there. This is an app for taking a ticket and getting in line to be creampied by the same group of tools.

>>511092881
>nobody does this.
There are numerous anons here who are butthurt and arguing with me because I am saying that they aren't good men when they do that stuff. They don't deny that they do it.
>nobody thinks this
Most of the guys posting in this very thread, and in every other thread on the internet about how girls are so bad for fucking bad guys instead of nice guys does that.
>actually guys that are just nice, are looked down on by women.
No, women actually love the guys who are just nice to them without expecting or acting entitled to getting something in return. If you were a truly nice guy, you would know that.
What women despise are the guys who pretend to be nice guys who don't want anything in return, but are really just hoping to eventually weasel their way into their panties.

>>511090397
>Just-world fallacy
typical

>>511093315
>he is objectively NOT a good man
Every book and Disney movie says otherwise. Men want sex. Naive good men want sex and to be a good polite and respectful man. That's what society told them to do. Eventually they find that fails. They still want sex. They're still good men. Now they're just far faster in kicking women out. The fact that you can't understand is why you're a woman.

>>511093336
Went into town the other night for the first time in years, it was lesbian night literally everywhere. You can laugh at men for being at home on a Friday night playing vidya, but I'm not sure that was any better. It was like ritualised cargo cult behavior.
Something has gone seriously wrong. Something complex and sociological for them, £5 a pint for us, a complete joke.

>install app
>look myself up
What will I find?

>>511072496 (OP)
What happened to the "WOMEN WANNA SHARE CHAD" cope incels?
No they don't.

>>511093626
you can`t stop projecting things on to men that aren`t true.

why would a guy who thinks women prefer assholes, try to get laid by being nice? it doesn`t make sense.

women like bad guys
guys who are not bad are understandably frustrated by this. thats it. thats all.

>>511092177
spoken like a true newfag

>>511093828
>women like bad guys
until they get pregnant by the bad guy
then they want the bad guy to marry them and mellow out and become a good guy
if he does, they become bored and disgusted by him being a good guy
so they look for a side dick who is a bad guy
and the cycle begins anew

>>511073642
some autists on pol used to run a coal burner database, coalfax I think.

>>511093626
>how girls are so bad for fucking bad guys instead of nice guys does that.
This is a universal truth. Women nearly universally dislike "good men". Good men become raging assholes or pedo priests. Women did this.
>No, women actually love the guys who are just nice to them without expecting or acting entitled to getting something in return.
You want a simp.
>If you were a truly nice guy, you would know that.
Simps dont get actual relationships. Women abuse men by appealing to be treated well and giving nothing back. Women like this are morally corrupt.
>What women despise are the guys who pretend to be nice guys who don't want anything in return
Men are gay or want to fuck you if you're not that ugly. Single moms need to explain this.
>but are really just hoping to eventually weasel their way into their panties.
Dogs want steak and men want sex. They're still good dogs and good men.

>>511086328
way ahead of you

>>511093301
Being a beta bucks simp is still doing the exact same thing, where you are trying to transact your way into getting sex without being transparent about what you really want or the terms of this unspoken deal that you are trying to force on the other person.
I personally never take girls out on dates or spend money on them or anything like that unless I am currently in an actual relationship with them. But otherwise no more than the de minimus stuff I would do for my male friends without expecting anything in return, like buying the next round of shots or paying for a game of pool or letting them crash at my place if they can't get home.
>If she took anything including my time without bring truthful with her intentions then that's on her.
I get that you are trying to flip this around on women to make them seem just as culpable, but it doesn't really work. If a woman is having a conversation with you, getting attention and validation and entertainment from you, she wasn't really concealing her attention. She wasn't secretly trying to manipulate you into giving her something else, her true intention was to get attention and validation and entertainment from you.
If you were straightforward and direct and honest with women and explicitly said something like
>Just so you know, the only reason I am being nice and talking to you and taking you out to dinner is because I want to fuck you and am exchanging my timer and attention for sex from you. And that's the only reason I am doing this and if I knew for sure I was never going to get sex from you, I would never be nice tp you or talk to you or take you out to dinner.
If you said something like that and were honest about your true intentions and motivations, that would be perfectly fine. You are both honest about your intentions and what you expect and want, and both have the opportunity to agree to the terms or walk away.
But that isn't what you do.

>>511093626
You approach with your sexual intentions in front:
>omg men are such pigs they only want one thing, how dare you, you sex pest
You approach with your sexual intentions in the back:
>omg men are such dishonest weasels, he was only being nice to fuck me, how dare you, weasel
can't win, can you

>>511094655
don`t pretend you`re a man please, we all know we`re arguing with a woman because of all the chick logic.

>>511093416
>asshole men get laid because they`re assholes
Asshole men don't get laid because they are assholes most of the time, they get laid because of the other 1% of the time when they are actually nice and sweet and romantic with their girls.
It's rare and hard to acquire, and things that are rare and hard to get are valuable. Things that are easy to get and always available for free, like a simp's niceness, are cheap and worthless.

>>511092104
god you're a fucking retard
women live for this shit, all women do is make up shit like this

>>511094863
ok so be an asshole 99% of the time and then be nice 1% of the time thats the winning formula

too bad i dont give a fuck and will continue to be nice even if though it gets me nowhere because its just not in me to be a piece of shit asshole.

and im nice to everyone because its just easier and comes naturally but im not simping. im just not being an asshole. even though i know women would love me if i was but fuck that and fuck you.

>>511093729
>Every book and Disney movie says otherwise.
Books and fucking Disney movies aren't the basis of morality, you stupid retard.
>Naive good men want sex and to be a good polite and respectful man.
No, they act like good polite and respectful men because they think it will lead to pussy. They aren't actually good polite and respectful men, they were just acting like that because they thought that's how to get laid.
>They're still good men.
No, and you never were a good man if you were being nice because you wanted sex.
>The fact that you can't understand is why you're a woman.
I obviously understand all of this stuff far better than you. I'm not a woman, I am a man who isn't a retard stuck in the "what do I do to get girls to fuck me" stage of thirsty inceldom like you.

>>511075059
>I think of a man, then take away reason and accountability.
Probably the best line of any media, ever.

>>511085908
Average IS bad with mating. How many fat, porn addicted losers want an “average” chick? Every White kid that grows up in the Western world is fed delusions of grandeur their whole lives. EVERYONE thinks they are exceptional in some way, even people with outwardly low self esteem. The men who want average women are BELOW average men. Marriage and relationships are basically a lifestyle choice now. If you aren’t hot enough to play ball you basically get left on the sidelines. Low value would rather gamble on getting rich than settle for some ugly roastie.

>>511093828
>why would a guy who thinks women prefer assholes, try to get laid by being nice? it doesn`t make sense.
You only started thinking that women preferred assholes after your "pretend to be nice to get laid" strategy failed over and over.
And then after you made the "realization" that women prefer assholes, you were probably just still too inhibited and uptight and weak to start being an asshole, so you instead started seething about women preferring asshsoles over supposedly nice guys like you.

>>511072496 (OP)
Easy lawsuit.
Defamation of character.

>>511095248
so the naturally polite and respectful guy who also wants pussy should just cut his losses early
if being naturally polite and respectful seems to put you the friendzone, move on (politely and respectfully)
thirsty guys overinvest their time, effort, money and then complain about bad ROI

>>511073642
make it, pretty good idea since there is so much info about women online
it could actually be a big thing
all that information is publically available

>>511095248
>No, they act like good polite and respectful men because they think it will lead to pussy
NOBODY THINKS THIS

women just gaslight themselves into believing this is true because the alternative is admitting to themselves that they are shitty people who prefer assholes.

does he want sex? of course. ALL MEN DO
is he being nice? yes, well, he`s probably just nice. it doesn`t mean he`s being nice because he thinks it will get him laid. but it does mean he will be bitter when he sees that guys who arent nice at all get everywhere with women.

>im not a woman
yes you are. because no man thinks like this. your posts are dripping with chick logic and the kind of assumptions women make about men because they dont understand men at all

>>511095445
it was never a strategy
being nice to get laid does not even make sense. im nice to my grandma am i trying to fuck her too? im nice to everyone. its who i am its not a strategy

>>511076718
coalfax had horrible optics for public release
you could slip in racial history under a bodycount type app and racial preferences

>>511072496 (OP)
https://hoefax.com/

>>511094655
>beta bucks simp is still doing the exact same thing
It only works if women are honest about taking stuff in exchange for sex. You're not entitled to my wallet.
>her true intention was to get attention and validation and entertainment from you.
If shes entitled to this then men are entitled to sex. Your argument is that women have no agency and are completely oblivious to the dog wanting a bone.

>>511077057
>opticsfagging in the year of our lord 2025
LMAOOO
Time really does go in circles.

>>511072496 (OP)
Just report it to the ADL for being antisemitic. It will be gone by sunrise.

>>511095248
>they act like good polite and respectful men because they think it will lead to pussy.
Men start wanting pussy and wanting to be polite and respectful. These aren't incompatible thoughts. Then they turn 13.
>They aren't actually good polite and respectful men
Your actions define you. Not your thought crimes. Woman logic.

>>511089181
ngmi

>>511096193
>Just report it to the ADL for being antisemitic. It will be gone by sunrise.

>>511095236
>too bad i dont give a fuck
Sure seems like you give a fuck. Otherwise you wouldn't be all butthurt and seething about women fucking assholes instead of you.
>and will continue to be nice even if though it gets me nowhere
>gets me nowhere
You should be nice to other people for its own sake, not because you want to get something out of it.

>>511089181
Wishful thinking, I strongly doubt it. What makes you think that could be a possibility?

>>511072496 (OP)
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/behead-all-satans-mnm-dr/1122270988

>>511095445
>"pretend to be nice to get laid"
I've watched actual nice guys completely fail to get anywhere. Nice doesn't work with women past middle school. They were nice to me so I trust they weren't trying to sleep with me. They still wanted sex. They still were good guys. Women take advantage of this.

>>511096534
yes, i should be nice to other people for its own sake, not because i want to get something out of it. AND I AM. the issue is that i`m being penalized for being nice while being an asshole would get me rewarded instead.

i give a fuck in the sense that i am bitter about it but not in the sense that im going to change my behavior and start acting like an asshole to impress women.

>>511093121
> morally corrupt
Yeah, you’re a gash. If you were a man you’d simply call that other anon a pussy or chickenshit. Women have to turn things into a moral defect so they feel virtuous by enforcing the social norms.

>>511095529
>if being naturally polite and respectful seems to put you the friendzone
If you were genuinely polite and respectful, you wouldn't be upset about ending up in the friendzone.
The real reason women don't want to fuck you isn't because you are naturally polite and respectful, it's because they can tell that you are only being nice because you secretly think it will help you get laid.
You are the male version of girls saying "oh, I'm not like other girls" when they really are just like those girls.
>Oh, I'm not like those assholes who just want to fuck you, I am genuinely polite and respectful
>REEEE, why do girls fuck assholes instead of me?!?!

>>511095543
>doesn`t mean he`s being nice because he thinks it will get him laid.
But he'll drop her if she doesn't reciprocate, like pay for drinks, or if either catches feelings. Then by chick logic he was never a good guy.

>>511097007
>you wouldn't be upset
who says I'm upset
I do a thing, thing doesn't work, I stop doing thing and move on
if the girl requires asshole behavior because that's how she's wired, then she's not for me
I'm not going to fake being an asshole for the entirety of the relationship, that's just stupid and tiresome

>>511095543
>NOBODY THINKS THIS
(You) literally think that.
>he will be bitter when he sees that guys who arent nice at all get everywhere with women
The ONLY reason that makes you bitter is because you were in fact just being nice because you thought it would get you laid. Then when it doesn't happen, you seethe.
If you were honestly being nice for its own sake, then you wouldn't be bitter about nice guys not getting laid.

>>511096534
>You should be nice to other people for its own sake, not because you want to get something out of it.
Please explain this to women. They don't understand.

>>511072496 (OP)
>find yourself on there
>send takedown notice to app developer
>sue app developer for defamation
>subpoena hole who put you theres information
>sue hole for defamation
Ezpz

>>511090397
They hated him because he spoke the truth

wonderful. nobody outside of government records knows who the fuck i am.

>>511096937
>change my behavior and start acting like an asshole to impress women.
You act like an asshole to show that women have no power over you.

>>511089181
lmao, no

>>511090397
most guys were actually "good men", to a T. The true sexual intentions used to ALWAYS BE IMPLIED until women weaponized their orbiters as emotional tampons during the introduction of social media.

The idea of legitimately liking a woman and also wanting to have sex with them used to be the DEFAULT. YES THE WHOLE POINT OF BEING NICE TO WOMEN IS TO TRY TO FUCK THEM AND THEN GET INTO A RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM.

no woman ever flat out asks their beta orbiters if they want to fuck them because they already know the answer, which is yes. so feminism runs cover for this female behavior as plausible deniability so that women can maintain higher social status by saying "teehee i didn't know he wanted to fuck me what a shitty niceguy lolol"

so women can get all of the

>>511095625
>it was never a strategy

>being nice to get laid does not even make sense.
It's a stupid strategy that doesn't work, but many men like yourself still try to use that strategy even though you won't admit it.
>im nice to my grandma am i trying to fuck her too?
You don't get upset about your grandma not fucking you because you weren't just being nice because you were trying to fuck her.
You do get upset when girls you are nice to don't fuck you because you were just trying to fuck them.
If you were nice to girls for the same reason you are nice to grandma or your male friends, you wouldn't be mad about girls not fucking you, in the same way that you aren't mad about your grandma or your male friends not fucking you.

>>511090744
>>511090326
>>511097242
Ok, so which guy is gonna get the ball rolling in terms of an expensive lawsuit?
Oh, right, none of them, because half of dating market age men are dropouts/NEETs who don't actually have an income.

>>511097007
>>511097180

>If you were genuinely polite and respectful, you wouldn't be upset about ending up in the friendzone.
why not? why wouldn`t he be upset by that? he`s not being nice to get laid, he`s being nice because he is nice. yes he would like to get laid but that`s not why he`s being nice. that`js what you don`t understand. he`s spending time around you and near you because he would like to get laid, same as the asshole. but the asshole isnt being an asshole as a tactic to get laid, and the nice guy isnt being nice as a tactic to get laid either. nevertheless the asshole will get laid because he`s an asshole. and the nice guy will be frustrated and bitter about it.

>>511097342
>so women can get all of the
spit it out, anon, we know you have bucketfuls of cum in your mouth to share!

>>511078016
Use thispersondoesnotnexist.com. Make a bunch of accounts. Use them for shenanigans.

>>511097007
>you wouldn't be upset about ending up in the friendzone.
Friend zoned men are nearly universally taken advantage of. A man can be nice and polite with other men and they'll be actual friends.
>The real reason women don't want to fuck you isn't because you are naturally polite and respectful
Yet every man that turns into an asshole increases his chance of getting laid by 1000%. Women simply do not respect nice.

>>511091453
>but I meant conquering the world kek
You can keep your world of ashes, I want little from it.

>>511078386
are the guy who plays on 24/7 skial harvest? The moonman player?

>>511097180
>just being nice because you thought it would get you laid.
You can't comprehend that most men are initially nice until women force them to change.

>>511097419
see
>>511097464
read it again and again and again and dont respond until you actually understand

>>511097455
never heard of class action before?

>>511088549
>you're a jeet aren't you?
KEK Caught red handed. I didn't even have to read to know the reply was going to say this.

>>511097342
>The true sexual intentions used to ALWAYS BE IMPLIED until women weaponized their orbiters
Modern women completely fail to understand men. Men understand women far more.

women are just incapable of understanding men and incapable of understanding that they`re incapable of understanding men. so they make up all kinds of horrible shit about us projecting their own psychology on to our behaviors, but that doesn't work.

>>511097419
>but many men like yourself still try to use that strategy even though you won't admit it.
Being nice and wanting sex are different things.

>>511096018
>women are honest about taking stuff in exchange for sex.
Women aren't taking stuff in exchange for sex. You are freely offering them stuff without being honest that you are really only giving them stuff because you hope to exchange your stuff for sex
>You're not entitled to my wallet.
No, and you aren't entitled to sex from them.
>If shes entitled to this then men are entitled to sex.
No one is entitled to anything.
>Your argument is that women have no agency and are completely oblivious to the dog wanting a bone.
Not at all. Women aren't oblivious at all, they know exactly what you are trying to do, which is why they don't fuck you.
They aren't taking advantage of you or anything like that, you offered them stuff in the guise of it being a gift freely given because you are just such a nice genuine guy, but really in your head you did have strings attached and were only giving them stuff because you thought it would entitle you to get sex from them in return.
It is hard enough to enforce oral contracts that both parties have verbally agreed to. You are basically trying to form a secret contract where you silently set the terms and conditions entirely inside your own head, then getting mad because the girl is breaking the imaginary contract that only ever existed inside your own mind.

>>511098130
>Women aren't oblivious at all, they know exactly what you are trying to do,
>imaginary contract that only ever existed inside your own mind.
do you not see the contradiction?

if he offers to buy you a drink, and you`re not interested in him, then don`t accept the drink. because you both know whats going on here

>>511089771
>no information on who made this chart
"their" told me all i needed to know about the tardo who made that chart

>>511072496 (OP)
How does this work? Does it strip portfolios from other apps?

>>511098130
>Women aren't taking stuff in exchange for sex.
They do constantly. Even as friends they want attention yet never reciprocate.
>secret contract where you silently set the terms and conditions entirely inside your own head, then getting mad because the girl is breaking the imaginary contract
Every girl I've ever met does this. If a girl doesn't reciprocate you ghost her. Friends pick up tabs and help.

>>511098130

>>511096289
>These aren't incompatible thoughts.
They shouldn't be. The problem is that you fags think that being polite and respectful should entitle you to sex in return.
If you were truly polite and respectful, you wouldn't get butthurt when it doesn't lead to sex.
>Your actions define you.
You motivations matter just as much, if not more, than your external actions.
Doing superficial, seemingly "good" things when you are really only doing them to try to get the other person to do something that personally benefits you isn't good at all. It's literally just manipulative behavior.
You are completely morally retarded.

>>511097455
If I found myself on there, I absolutely would start a law suit. I'm not poor like you who has to consider the costs. Also, I left out:
>sue apple for knowingly allowing an application designed to defame and harass, considering they vet and approve every single app on their app store.
This shit is going to pay off big to anybody who is on there and can be bothered suing the shit out of all parties involved.

>>511098539
>The problem is that you fags think that being polite and respectful should entitle you to sex in return.
NO WE DON`T

we think we shouldn`t be at a disadvantage for being polite and respectful BUT WE ARE

we think being an asshole shouldn`t be an advantage. BUT IT IS

>>511098539
>being polite and respectful should entitle you to sex in return.
If a man is an asshole you completely understand and accept he probably wants sex. If a man is a nice guy you're outraged that your simp is overstepping. You don't own him.
>It's literally just manipulative behavior.
This describes 99% of women's actions and your argument.

>>511096937
>not because i want to get something out of it. AND I AM.
>i`m being penalized for being nice while being an asshole would get me rewarded instead
The fact that you think of "not getting sex" as a penalty for your behavior vs "getting sex" as a reward for an assholes behavior shows that you do in fact want to get something out of it.
If you were being nice for its own sake, you wouldn't give a fuck about that shit, because that wasn't why you were being nice.

>>511098539
No one thinks this much about sex you weird fucking hole. We just want someone who loves us instead of the shit we have to deal with now

My grandfather was kind
My father is kind
Me being kind gives the ick
Get fucked

>>511098539
>What are transactional relationships

All interactions are transactional, you faggot

>>511098539
so you're just saying the naturally non-assholes should start faking being assholes
since that's the way to get laid these days

>>511096908
>nice guys completely fail to get anywhere
>Nice doesn't work with women
Phrasing it like that shows that you aren't really thinking about genuine niceness for its own sake, you basically just see "nice" as just an alternate strategy to pickup artist bullshit, and that the problem is that the strategy doesn't work.

>>511098803
i am being nice for its own sake
thats why i continue to be nice even though i know it puts me at a disadvantage

i am frustrated that being nice puts me at a disadvantage while being an asshole would give me an advantage

its clear you dont understand men and never will and will continue projecting nasty sexist strawmen on to every guy who is nice and also interested in you assuming that his niceness is some kind of tactic. its not. you`re just fucking retarded and doomed to a life of being pump and dumped by chads until you`jre too old for any man to want you anymore.

Has anyone gotten into the app?

>>511072496 (OP)
I really was born with the worst life in the worst timeline
I'm never going to have a family and that really fucking sucks

>>511099010
no. he is tired of being nice putting him at a disadvantage while knowing that being an asshole would put him at an advantage. thats it.

>>511097164
Fair enough. The real solution for men is to set good boundaries and don't simp. Be honest and straightforward about your true intentions and don't get overly invested in any particular woman because you are trying to win her over or whatever.

>>511098546
and my dad works at nintendo. it's easy to talk about what you "would" do, but there are still defamation apps targeting men no one has challenged.

Holy fuck it lets you doxx with a phone number

>>511099192
>Be honest and straightforward about your true intentions
"hello i would like to have sex with you"
thats creepy
you wouldn`t like that
"hello can i buy you a drink?" if youre interested in maybe exploring whether youre into him or not then accept. if you already know youre not then decline. that way men youre not attracted to dont need to make themselves and you uncomfortable by straight up asking for sex. nobody does that

>>511099192
>trying to win her over
yep this never works
attraction is either (almost) immediately there or won't ever be

>>511072496 (OP)
>Libel: The App
You’re looking at this wrong. This app IS Coalfax but even better! Take every bitch that talks shit on you to court for libel and make them prove the claims. The real “tea” will come out in discovery.

Lawyer up fellas, this is a gravy train for one of you Chads.

>>511072496 (OP)
>women just released
No they didn't, kys.

>>511097342
>The true sexual intentions used to ALWAYS BE IMPLIED
You were mindfucked by all of the #metoo toxic masculinity rape culture must get affirmative written consent indoctrination.
It was understood that men wanted to fuck girls, but more importantly, men didn't try to hide it (and the men who actually get girls today still don't try to hide it). It's expected that a man will try to push things forward and push for sex and be aggressive and constantly try to convince the girl to give in and fuck him.
The disconnect today is from men who want to have sex with a girl, but try to conceal this intent because they are avoiding doing anything that could result in them getting rejected sexually.
Woman meets a guy, and assumes that he is like every other heterosexual guy and wants to fuck her. But the guy, through his words and actions, communicates the exact opposite. He doesn't aggressively push for sex, he isn't constantly trying to grope her or feel her up or make out with her or sexualize everything she says.
When you do the Nice Guy™ shit, you are effectively telling the woman that no, you don't just see her as a sex object. You are telling her that you are fine with and want to hang out and talk and do things together and give her attention and time and gifts and validation and emotional support, even though she isn't fucking you. You basically do everything to make it seem like you *want* to be in the non-sexual friendzone...until one day she fucks some other dude and then suddenly you aren't ok with it and reveal that the whole time you secretly did just want to fuck her, but were too much of a pussy to be honest about it.