Were jews involved in producing media before the 1900s as well?

or is jews in media a relatively recent thing?

GutenBERG

>>511085145
Let's not forget that Titanic was drowned by IceBERG

>>511084778 (OP)
They literally do control Hollywood.

>>511085251
yea, obviously. everyone knows that. I was trying to look for the article that said "of course jews control hollywood" but couldn't find it.

Calling it a "canard" is itself a canard.

>>511085315
>yea, obviously. everyone knows that. I was trying to look for the article that said "of course jews control hollywood" but couldn't find it.
I know the one you mean but I don't have it.

>>511084778 (OP)
Most playwriters actors in old Europe were Jewish.
It worked because they were basically just dancing monkeys while the real important work got done independent of them.
Policies were made by monarchies so the subversive media wasn't as big of a deal.

Then democracy happened, and media technology advanced.
Now the Jews found themselves with power that they should never have been allowed to maintain.

>>511084778 (OP)
An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood is a 1988 non-fiction book whose topic is the careers of several prominent Jewish film producers in the early years of Hollywood. Author Neal Gabler focuses on the psychological motivations of these film moguls, arguing that their background as Jewish immigrants shaped their careers and influenced the movies they made.

>>511085369
I read a recent tweet thread about jews in the media that was saying that even in new forms of media like podcasts, Jews are still on top. Guys like adam friedland are basically entirely organic.

jews are simply good at making media, better than anyone else. the public prefers to consume jewish media. perhaps they are just more confident in putting their shit out there, or maybe they just live in media production superclusters like NYC, or maybe people just enjoy watching them because they are funny

>>511085504
interesting
do you have any idea about when this switch from monarchy -> democracy was happening and what types of media was popular then among the public?

>>511085145
>>511085235
gutenberg wasn't jewish. it's the other way around - jews inherited germanic names like "Berg" and "stein" rather than those names being indigenous to jews.

>>511085628
the guy who owns the rights to power rangers is one of the richest guys in hollywood lmao. Haim Saban.

it's crazy how owning literally ANY famous media property makes you a billionaire. even some stupid fucking shit like power rangers

>>511085315
>>511085369
There's a few different articles like that
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2008-dec-19-oe-stein19-story.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20010504004454/http://www.eonline.com:80/Features/Specials/Jews/index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20120705065748/http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/

>>511084778 (OP)
itsallsotiresome.jpg

>>511084778 (OP)
>Alleged
death to israel I hope its supporters get monkeypox

>

guys please just answer the point of the thread instead of spouting the same shit you post in every other thread

did jews make media before 1900? I know Marx wrote a book on communism is that it?

>>511086853
What is the real reason you made this thread when your answer can be found with a simple web search

https://dhjewsofboston.northeastern.edu/the-social-network-of-the-jewish-press-from-1840-1939/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14687968231184632

this one is in rat scratches
https://www.nli.org.il/en/discover/newspapers/jpress

>>511086853
i think some fellers named martin luther and voltaire wrote on the matter youre inquiring long before the turn of the 20th century

>>511085989
>adam friedland are basically entirely organic.

>>511084778 (OP)
they owned theaters, taverns for centuries. they dominated music and theater thru these industries

>>511088316
the guy has been putting work into his media career for decades, show me people who have been consistently putting shit out for as long as he have who don't have the same results

>>511088316
also friedland is an anti-zionist so there really isn't much reason to not like the guy

>>511084778 (OP)
this is like asking did the chinese? probably bro. ask the russian ash and dirt