Whites are responsible for 90% of child abuse in UK.

>nooo, i didn't rape child. It was bloody immigrants.

Go on /pol/ defend white pedophiles now.

>Excludes defendants whose ethnicity was not recorded
That would be most of them

>>511121854
/thread

>>511121768 (OP)
post you fkn dirty brown hand

>>511121768 (OP)
You're a complete retard memeflag. The UK is still (somehow) predominantly white, so guess what; there are more whites in the nation than any other race. If 2% of whites in the country commit child abuse and 90% of ethnic minorities in the country commit child abuse, it exposes an underlying problem

>>511122316
Which is why the report only uses percentages. In principle a totally valid approach. However, in the small print they say that cases are excluded where no ethnicity is recorded. Which will be most of them, because it's fucking illegal to do so when it's not relevant to the case.

>>511121768 (OP)
All statistics are false.

>>511121768 (OP)
So why did they omit the cases that had no assigned ethnicity altogether? Why are we allies with such a down low scummy nation that releases propaganda at every turn?

>>511122316
80% whites committing 90% child abuse. Read the fuckin table first.

>>511122556
>>511121854
Fucking faggots, read the table first. Other minorities (whose ethnicity was not mentioned) responsible for 1% , It was also included in the perchantage.
Pol will never highlight crimes of their own.

>>511121768 (OP)
We know

>>511121768 (OP)

>>511121768 (OP)
.

>>511121768 (OP)
,

>>511121768 (OP)
/

>>511121768 (OP)
'

>>511121768 (OP)
90% of reported child abuse. Non-white crime is never supported. Police don't even go into non-white areas. Laws only apply to white people.

>>511121768 (OP)
;

>>511121768 (OP)
]

>>511121768 (OP)
Obligatory its legal and not reported to rape kids if your non white.

>>511121768 (OP)
>0%

>>511124938
>>511124910
>>511124877
>>511124860
>>511124827
>>511124809
>>511124777
wtf, I support white genocide now!

>>511121768 (OP)
This image has been thoroughly debunked on X multiple times. Not worth a thread on here, fuck you Paki.

>>511125505
>debunked on Xitter
Mutt brain
https://www.csacentre.org.uk/app/uploads/2025/03/Child-sexual-abuse-in-2023-24-Trends-in-official-data.pdf

>>511124910
Been searching for this for a while. Can you give me the link

>>511124910
Oh finnally found it.
As always /pol/ never verifies, believes everything they agree with.

Go check it yourself: https://sor.dps.texas.gov/PublicSite/Search/Rapsheet?Sid=01586575

>>511121768 (OP)
You niggers still don't understand what per capita means. Furthermore, family courts are very accommodating when women claim during a divorce that their husband abused their children. They don't even require proof, and it all goes into the statistics.

>>511127546
The registry counts his race as black now. But has it not occured to you that they could change what his race is listed as between when the screenshot was taken and now? archived snapshots of that page exist and it says the same as the screenshot

https://archive.ph/gIxcS