>>511132705 (OP)Democracy is flawed and overrated.
Fascism is more practical but stigmatized.
they're both forms of collectivism, with Fascism being a more secure, consistent and reliable form of it. and thats because the flaws in democracy can lead to undesirable and regrettable results. for one, the majority isn't always right. and also because a homogeneous collective doesnt need to vote on every last thing because they are already in agreement with each other and share the same interests, needs, concerns etc. they can focus more on synergy than the divisive nature of democracy. and democracy doesnt work as well with broader demographics because the differences between the various people are too many to the point that it causes more dysfunction and turmoil.
democracy is not "the best we got" by a long shot. it in theory would only be IF everyone voting wasn't a misinformed retard or some dishonest piece of shit. its for mature, wise, knowledgeable, people. the problem is theres too many people that dont know whats best for themselves or others, and their votes are often misguided and made for the wrong reasons with the wrong expectations and they dont even get what they want. Democracy is just frustrating bullshit. its not driving progress like people would like to pretend. if anything it makes everything more stressful and conflicted. its a great idea though.. self governance, lateral power or control distributed amongst the people. but nope.. some people are stupid, or they dont know better, and its superior to manage large collectives from the top down instead of having everyone running around trying to control whats happening.
yes i'm an elitist. but only because i'm smart enough to see why the smart people should be in control more so than the masses. as long as those smart people aren't evil. so dont mistake me for someone who shares the same views as Mr. Peterson with his pareto distributions rhetoric.
the democracy pill is blue after all.
