Is this really becoming normal for churches? At least there's no young people watching this shit.
Seeing all these boomers indoctrinated this way explains a lot as to whats been going on in this country.

>>511154069 (OP)
Galatians 3:28
>There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus

Christianity was the original proto-globohomo and the West has fallen because of it. Truly the most sickening, pussified, semitic death cult of them all.

>>511154069 (OP)
>least there's no young people watching this shit.
>Seeing all these boomers indoctrinated this way explains a lot as to whats been going on in this country.
Go into any 'church' with a faggot flag and this is what you find.

>>511154069 (OP)
>Is this really becoming normal
No, but you will pretend that it is in order to push your narrative.

>>511154069 (OP)
Jebus sez that to love one's neighbors as one loves themself is the first commandment :)

>>511155575
/thread
It's only a few dying denominations that do this crap.

>>511155415
the entire congregation is 20 dementia ridden hospice patients who dont even know whats going on

>>511155575
idk 2 of the churches in my area have pride flags flying. not a majority but not rare either.

>>511154069 (OP)

>Christ is kang

Daily reminder that nu-pol is 95% shitskin. Nick Fuentes convinced millions of browns that they can become Aryans through worshiping a fictional jewish rabbi and sending him money. That is why they infest all our online spaces, they really think they belong as" brothers in christ".

>>511156731
>Daily reminder
>memeflag
Worthless post.

>>511154069 (OP)

Also keep in mind that a lot of these "TradCath" shitskins are literal sexual deviants/pedophiles. They are either faggots with a sexual fetish for far-right men and/or pedophiles who think this is their best way of gaining access to our children. Try and count the numbers of shitskinned pedophiles that have been in Nick Fuentes' orbit. The number is truly shocking! No exceptions anymore!

>>511154069 (OP)
Most people don't know it yet; but there is a not-so-quiet revolution happening in the Christian churches; one that is almost guaranteed to schism the churches into two main camps.

Here's the issue in a nutshell...
> most evidence suggests that homosexuality is genetic
> the bible has multiple clear prohibitions against homosexual acts.

So now, the churches are forced to answer the question... do we reject otherwise decent people because of a characteristic they probably had no choice in; or do we reject the clear prohibitions of the bible; expunging them from our religion (and eventually), our bibles.

There will be many who line up on both sides; but it's a question that all religions will be forced to go on record answering.

>>511156731
Daily reminder that I will alway be the number 1 chess champion of /pol/, and you will always be a loser. It's all predestined.

>>511154069 (OP)
>christianity

>>511154069 (OP)

Paganism (Asatru specifically) has firewalls built-in preventing shitskins from ever joining.

How can jamal, jose, or rajeesh join a religion that is built around the worship of their Norse ancestors? (of course I'm sure the brown parasites will still try to join, but AFA is white only!).

If you're ethnically European, go join the Asatru Folk Assembly!

My Master is more powerful than all imagination concept.

The world was created just for Me.

>>511157052
the church does not reject homosexuals. it rejects the sin of homosexuality.
if homosexuality is biological, it is a burden that the person must carry and manage, just like people with down's, early onset cancer, etc.
it definitely does not mean the church should enable homosexuality

>>511154069 (OP)
>Is this really becoming normal for churches?
Yeah for the last 40 fucking years, retard.

>>511157284
Which clearly puts you on one side.

So you're basically saying that X% of the population should be forced to live a life without love, companionship, shared finances, etc; all because something they didn't choose is contrary to the beliefs of someone else?

Your response sums up why this will create a schism. There can be no middle-ground on a basic issue; and both answers will result in a destruction of the church's

>>511157107
Look at most antisemites on the left & even here with us on the conservative right. The way they live, their mental conditions, their wealth, their luck...might as well be cursed. Losers, all of them

>>511154069 (OP)
>anti-christian thread #9001
Why do these threads stay up when anti-muslim and kike threads get deleted?

>>511157052
i reject that homosexuality is genetic. This is coming from the same group that said that trans brains were different than cis brains. (which was a lie, the "difference" is only after years of hormones)
and its the same group that said that all races are blank slates with the same intelligence. (also clearly bullshit, even after studies give black kids every possible advantage over whites they're still 10-15 iq points behind)
homosexuality is likely 90% a social contagion. maybe some people are genetically more inclined to fall for the social contagion but still.

"electro-shock" may not work, but i bet giving people state mandated girlfriends would

>>511157512
It's a curse to live and think only about Money. My life is blessed. I don't have to think much about Money.

>>511154069 (OP)
Thats not a church. They have driven out God from that space. Also, no Eucharist = no church

>>511157711
>state mandated girlfriends
Most women are not attractive. Doing this can result in a lot of suicide.

>>511157340
I guess I was just in denial, even one of the pretty goth looking churches downtown is waving a gay flag now. sad to see.

>>511157753
shut up memeflag nobody takes memeflags seriously, are you trying to hide israel or india? are you really too poor to just vpn your way in?

>>511157490
state mandated girlfriends would fix this, ban porn and give people girlfriends and 95% of the fags would stop being gay.

>>511157950
I care not about your opinion. I will do what I like. I am the King of the universe, and the only TRUE chosen ONE of GOD.

>>511157490
ok, but you framed the question as if having 2 answers: reject homosexuals, or embrace homosexuality. the catholic and orthodox churches have already answered this question, homosexuals are not rejected, their sin is. just like every other sin.
>should be forced to live a life without love, companionship, shared finances, etc;
everyone has a cross to carry but implying these are impossible without sodomy is a ridiculous assumption.
>all because something they didn't choose
nobody had a choice in the matter. we are all sinners by definition of our fallen human nature. again, homosexuality is only one of many individual struggles that a person might turn to faith to confront.
>is contrary to the beliefs of someone else
contrary to godliness and the tenets of the faith. protestants may be okay with tweaking things because they think they know better, but not every church is like that. the schism between protestant/catholic/orthodox is much older than the homosexual quesion, and the matter is all but settled for the latter 2.

In all Heaven and Earth
In all that existed and will exist for all of Eternity

I, alone, am the chosen ONE of God.

>>511154069 (OP)
We are being overtaken by cancer
Only Varg's fire can save us now
We need to take things back to Formula stage

>>511158308
Start by killing the long nose cunts who dare to declare themselves chosen by God.

The only chosen ONE of GOD is ME

This is why churches are becoming mosques. They are blaspheming God just to attract young people and money.

This is the influence of atheism and secularism, that is the root of neoliberalism.

Look at how old they are. When they die there won't be a congregation to support the church.

>>511158546
how can we successfully psyop muslims into becoming gay like the jews did to us. probably harder now that muslims can see just how bad this shit has been for us

>>511154069 (OP)
Nah, that's just americans being degenerates.

>>511158811
America is destined to fall. So as Israel. It's not wise to go against the tide. You will have to pay for your sins.

>>511158546
>This is the influence of atheism and secularism
Not really atheist and secularist don't go to church my friend.

>>511154069 (OP)
meme "christian" denominations were a mistake

>>511159121
Atheist and secularist want to subvert the church. You posted this shit to attack the church.

Your intention is clear, you hate GOD, and all that is pure and good.

>>511154069 (OP)
Subversion and perversion is a thing. Demons will twist everything they can.

>>511154069 (OP)
I wonder who is behind this.

>>511159281
>Atheist and secularist want to subvert the church
Not really. You lot have your own problems to deal with.
>schizophrenia intensifies

>>511157138
too late

>>511157052
False choice. Homosexuals need to make the choice to turn away from their sins themselves. I'm not a fan of going to buildings to develop my relationship with God but I understand some people do. The church welcomes sinners who want to turn away from sin, not enable it.
You wouldn't expect a church to allow people to shoot up during service.

>>511159679
Who care? God is talking to me while I post the shit I do. It's epic, and awesome.

https://youtube.com/shorts/E3vW1YPk3i4?si=5MdwUNnohuSoGmEY

>>511154069 (OP)
The fact that you had to come here to ask the question is the answer.

>>511159726
Why is it always a jew, even his name is obvious holy fuck. Its probably safer to commune with nature and let God/Gods guide you.

>>511159679
>>schizophrenia intensifies
>>511160122

>>511157585
Demons can't help themselves. Worship anything but the Truth. The Talmud and Quran are not the Truth so they don't care.

Understanding Protestantism is key to understanding the erosion of decency in society and the perversion of Christianity. First, it's important to see that its not just "gay stuff" that is the issue, it is just a modern unavoidable and controversial issue. Take divorce for example, abortion, blasphemy in society; all these were unavoidable and controversial in their time, and many mainline protestant churches supported (or at least tolerated) those things before gay stuff became a liberal social cause, but now the concrete has dried on the older issues.
"Protestant" means "in protest" (of the Catholic Church), it is not some new word or cause separate from that, it is a protest, and they follow the same groupthink mindset of any protest we see today. Any modern protest full of people who have no attachment to history or understanding of civics can quickly become full of insane ideas and allow crazy people to warp the original intent; in Protestantism (without the Catholic Church's hierarchy and insistence on sacred tradition) anyone can introduce new doctrine/interpretation that eventually perverts the denomination they're in or creates a new sect based on the new idea. That is how we have so many denominations today: a new interpretation grew and made a home. In the early days of Protestantism it was almost manageable as the few small gripes they had were with the Catholic Church and there was some sense of "once they get rid of that then we can all be together again", but it quickly got out of hand and now it is impossible to reconcile even the protestant denominations let alone return home to the Catholic Church.
Protestantism is like a weed, and the denominations are its different strains, and their churches are like gardens. Anyone can develop new strains that will eventually outgrow the old ones and take over their gardens; so you see how easy it is to turn Protestantism into a factory for heresy and social causes.

>>511154258
Racialism and Christianity are incompatible

>>511154069 (OP)
Notice how everyone (but one person who was working the A/V) is a boomer? Liberal mainline Christianity is denying because there is nothing that distinguishes it from left-wing atheism. A lot of the people support (and have had) abortions and didn't raise their children to believe in Christ (because if they did, their children would realize that they were heretics)

>>511160434
Your pope kisses nigger feet.

>>511160399
Millenial atheist who like sex joke, and worship American Pie as a teen. That's you.

>>511160538
Yep, and it's high time whites realize that.

>>511157052
Original sin logic is clear - ALL humans are genetically defective and accepting God means rejecting human nature.

>>511156936
Anon you can tell it's not a Catholic church because it has a cross and not a crucifix. There's no corpus. It's a heretic protty denomination.

>>511154069 (OP)
Subversion and popculture.

In the end of days all of the mainstream church organizations will have to fall together with the human governments of the world.

Christ's kingdom is not of this humanist politcal Roman world.

>>511157138
By your logic no person would convert tô cristianism because christ is jewish.

>>511160538
fuck off jew

>>511160878
the only thing these kikes want to do is mislead people
they seriously are not even trying to be real humans, they are like hellspawn imps

>>511160052
It may be a false choice; but it's the choice that everyone (at least every church) is going to be made to make in public.

What will happen (either naturally or by design), is that there will be another schism; similar to the way the Protestant churches broke off over the issue of Rome (or the pope's) power or (more closely) the second council of nicaea; where the biggest debate of the ages was decided, resulting in a split between those on one side and those on the other.

I'm not saying that the question should be asked, or that it's a good thing it's being asked; or even taking a side either way on the question itself.

I'm saying that just as there were signs as early as the 1830's that the US would eventually face a civil war; so too there are now signs that the church will be forced to choose the lesser of two evils on this question. The revolution is that the question is being asked/forced

>>511159679
>>schizophrenia intensifies
>>511160697

>>511160538
It is if you go to confession

>>511154069 (OP)
churches are satans prime target

when you see tranny shit behind the pulpit you can almost be sure that god will burn that place to the ground in a few months

>>511154069 (OP)
>it's all 80 year old boomers

>>511160649
No that one is dead, and whatever any Pope does is his own business, it rarely changes the established doctrine. The Pope is not an infallible dictator who has the power to remake everything in his own image the moment he takes the seat, but look at how Protestant society has warped your ability to even comprehend the basics of Catholicism. You think we just pick new authors of the faith every time there is a new Pope? Many Protestants see it this way because each sect of Protestantism had its new author.

>>511156936
>>511160729
A Catholic church wouldn't have this anyway because there's no part of the mass where you dance around with things at the front of the church. Free-form masses are a Protestant thing.

Not that Catholics are exempt, the Catholic church is generally LGBTQ positive these days, or whatever else it has to be to put butts in seats.

>>511161454
>The Pope is not an infallible dictator who has the power to remake everything in his own image the moment he takes the seat
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility
You feces colored groypers are the absolute worst.

>>511161035
Absolution requires repentance

>>511160917
I'm catholic, full member of the church bud

>>511162756
Die jew

>>511161626
I am white and I am not a groyper, but since you mentioned that lets go into it:
There has been an infiltration of Catholic Youtube in the same way that the alt-lite corrupted the original alt-right positions. It operates similar to Protestant warping of doctrine that I have already outlined. The idea of upholding traditional values, latin mass, and the past is great and hardly any Catholic disagrees with that - so what did they do? Created a sub-sect of "radtrad" within the traditional catholic movement to try and pervert the original intent, sound familiar? Where we had Richard Spencer the traditional catholic scene has a slew of "recent converts" and e-celebs who operate as "hype artists" and create new redlines in order to drag those who get drawn into their bullshit away from understanding the complexity involved in modern Catholicism. As I've said, it starts small, its about the unavailability of latin mass for instance, but it quickly gets out of hand and now we have people who have no understanding of Catholic doctrine leading Catholics to a new Catholicism of their own design that they have cloaked in based terms. E-celebs are never to be trusted, even if they are honest about their goals they support a network of other e-celebs who introduce pitfalls for the movements they concern. Instead of waiting for Catholicism to submit itself based on the catalog of neo-beliefs your #community has developed (thanks to infiltrators and bad-actors) join your local Catholic Church and challenge yourself to develop the mercy and virtue needed to understand the faith as a whole. If you think "I should never have to accept anything but what I think is right" realize how many times you have already bowed down to e-celeb doctrine in disguise.

>>511163240
Yeah I'm not ignoring that you literally don't know your own church doctrine. >>511161626 fucking christkikes are worse than kikes.

>>511163402
>you literally don't know your own church doctrine
How so? Enlighten me, 1pbtid.

>>511163516
>>511161454 hurry durr the pope can't change doctrine
>>511161626 yes he can
>>511163240 oh um err *2000 word essay on nothing in a desperate attempt to distract*
Go kys christkike

>>511163240
This is actually a really good point. There is irony in the tradcaths touting traditional dogma when they seem to completely eschew the facet of Catholicism that is, put your mind away and receive only sound Vatican doctrine. They think they can make the rules, comes from a weak will.

>>511163743
The Pope does not change doctrine. Popes have spoken "ex cathedra" (from the seat) which means infallibly only twice in history, and only to settle a dispute:
>Immaculate Conception of Mary
>Assumption of Mary
Papal Bulls help explain new societal issues or standards but are not infallible teaching. Whatever the Pope says is his own opinion, also not infallible. We are not required to be his mind-slave or whatever Protestants might think based on "lies my Pastor told me". The doctrine of Catholicism has not changed at all despite all the bullshit you hear, not on gays, not on women-priests, nothing has changed.
>>511163938
What is worse is the fact that some of the most popular Catholic e-celebs (in the normie realm, i mean) are "recent converts" and 90% of what they promote are new ways to be dissatisfied with the Church based on each news story or viral moment. They have grown new anti-Catholic ideology from the original foundation of being dissatisfied with Vatican II. They sew new seeds of dissent daily and are paid to do it.

>>511154069 (OP)
>praising gay sex closet doors
yes i remember this part of the bible

>>511163938
The Fuentes strain is a bit different, more like gatekeepers, and their propaganda efforts are based on us entirely. All the spokesmen that become popular in their camp are of the various shades of what /ourguys might look like: How to keep the men who notice from finding a home in the Catholic Church and thus the ability to stand on solid ground. Like I've said, there may be a few who are noble in Fuentes sphere, but they either become swept into promoting the new ideas that become associated with the network (because you are either "based or not based" depending on "what you think of new thing"), or are unable to stand on their own and get lost in the crowd and labeled groypers even if they are not. As far as Catholics in our specific situation; they would rather keep us all enthralled by based ultimatums that stand in the way of our ability to connect with the Church.

everyone slow down

question:

is it possible to bring the "rainbow" symbology back into Christianity? I'm not really super Christian. But I find it an interesting challenge, considering that the rainbow was initially part of the Christian faith. Could we get people to take back the rainbow, and even build a solid foundation that respects it's origin in Christianity?

>>511161546
The church is not LGBTQIALMNOP+- ^2 leaning in any way, shape, or form. Get real.

>>511154069 (OP)
Why are they like this

Notice how the antagonistic element of the thread vanishes when the problem is addressed instead of giving in to debate with those who hate you. If you outline what they do they will stop posting and wait for the thread to die. I'm sure many of you are aware: the "pagans" here are not pagans, and should not be trusted or given any credibility.
>>511166873
The rainbow as a sign from God is best standing on its own, it is good to see God everywhere in nature and not to separate yourself from that by thinking that the man-made world and its symbolic landscape is where you belong or were made to exist. As far as its Catholic use it is somewhat, but not directly, represented in the various colors of stoles/vestments that the priests wear for the different liturgical seasons.
>green - life, hope
>purple - penance
>red - God's love, blood
>white/gold - purity, light
>blue - Mary, joy
>rose pink - anticipation
>black- mourning
They cycle throughout the year and are used to define the theme of the liturgy. Some colors are used more often than others, and in modern times nobody really thinks about what they mean anyway, its somewhat of a minute aesthetic detail. This is why Protestant priests use it on their own "rainbow scarf".