>>511182800
You literally lost. Tell the Dems to run something other than a poojeetess adulteress subhuman shitskin whore next time. Maybe you'll have a chance.
>>511182406 (OP)
can't a reporter just ask trump if he ever raped a child age 16 or under to put this shit to bed? or trump himself can just say he never raped a child age 16 or under so people stop calling him a pedophile. this isn't difficult
>>511182931
At the very least, I think everyone who was closely connected to Epstein should be investigated.
Trump has never been investigated for this, and he and Epstein were close friends for 15 years.
>>511182406 (OP)
Anon I think you have that backwards. If we're talking about the big hands then they only go up to 12, which according to what you said would mean that he would NOT use his cock on them if they were 12 or younger, meaning he's not a pedophile, or at the very most a hebephile. I strongly urge you to correct this if you repost this thread.