>>511196113
Women's desire to climb socially isn't the issue by itself here. The difference is that in the past they married to elevate their status, it wasn't really taken seriously otherwise. Some woman fucks the king, she does not become queen because she spread her legs. Marriage, then children will "lock in" the legitimacy. Whores, mistresses, "flings" whatever you want to call them, never had any legitimacy, even in cases where children were produced.
Women have been fed the lie that they can have their fun and use sex to climb socially without marriage. But then they learn the hard way, that men that don't have to commit, a lot of them just lie to get sex. If she's spreading her legs purely based on words said to her, then men will pick up on the magic words to say. You can try to blame the women here but women really are just fucking retarded when it comes to this stuff. I have dozens of stories, where women try to tell me that this or that happened, like one woman was wearing a black leather jacket she said she got from Noel Gallagher's cousin (and Noel wore it before giving it to him). She slept with this guy naturally. I went to the pub in the UK where she claimed it happened, the guys at the bar laughed and said he'd been doing that trick for years and must've bought about 20 leather jackets.
That's why the tradition was for you to ask for her father's hand in marriage before marrying her too. Because women would do dumb shit like agree to marry a man who was clearly bad for her. In fact if you notice, there's a lot of tropes in popular (((media))) that has tried very hard to normalise the idea of marrying based on feelings, "love" (which is really just lust and "vibe"). The father will be logical about whether it's actually in her interest and that's what kikes hate. Way way easier to just manipulate women and make us all think asking for the father's hand is just some relic of the past and not important anymore.