>>511221777
Legally you cannot interfere with most people.
Security is about insurance + providing a goon for someone to kick off at instead of patrons or property.
If the goon kicks back then you can fire him and hire a new one with all legal repercussion being directed at him "Because his mission statement clearly said don't do it".
Local security where I am who can deal with gypsies are required, by law, to get the police to deal with Every. Single. Person. who is a bother. There are several drunk, fat, passed it women who scream and shout and only the police are allowed to remove them from the premises.
>>511221896
>Government issues SIA licenses
Did mine and the Pajeets got extra time on the exam.
Funnily enough they didn't really train us much in the course and were very happy to coach us off-camera (you're filmed when doing the exam, it's like the system is trying to stop corruption on paper but the quotas require it, so everyone pretends it's working as intended).
For some reason the comprehensive paperwork included things like "Woah nuclear apocalypse! It might be (You)r job to do something!" but... the powerpoint had an entire dedicated section for trannies and how you have to let them go into whichever toilet they want. The class I was in was vocal about it, the bloke running the show hung his head and I couldn't tell if he was putting it on or hated it too. We didn't get told what the legal sitch is, just that we can't stop trannies... I don't know why he didn't try to say "Uhhh there's actually no law saying you can refuse entry to the toilets and there might be a law that says you have to let someone like when someone homeless asks for tapwater".
>>511222454
This.
>>511222134
>Is it a requirement to be able to speak English to get an SIA card?
Yes and no. I had to pass handwriting but I don't know if they actually cared.
Had to also agree to my person being recorded because "people" are hired to stand in for someone else halfway into the exam.