>>511276333 (OP)Revision is part of history. Archaeologists have proven themselves retarded and wrong time and time again. There is always an initial period of pushback for all new theories which is fine, there absolutely should be. However the absolute faggotry that has come from the archeological community (calling Hancock a racist etc.) has really been their undoing. If they just acted slightly less autistic and condescending it wouldn't drive people away from the conventional narrative.
This is the equivalent of two guys that both acknowledge that they don't have all the answers arguing instead of working together. The best way to shred Hancock's credibility would be to investigate his claims in good faith but noooo they insist that despite not excavating massive amounts of the earth that their samples are enough. I understand the logistical constraints of that undertaking but I think Hancock will eventually conceptually (as in there were massive civilisations that we didn't previously know about) be proven right and the modern academics will continue to defend their incredibly closed minded attitudes despite admitting to massive assumptions in most of their own work.
I work with academics, they are the slimiest, smarmiest most disingenuous cunts I have ever had the displeasure to be around and academic consensus means fuck all when you consider the amount of them that care more about fudging data for their shitty studies in order to get grants than actively trying to seek the truth.