>>511309305Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if they did this on purpose.
Ever since the 90s, we've had consistent headlines about child raping killers. Sarah Payne, the Soham girls Millie Dowler, Jimmy Saville, then the Paki gangs. They make out as if porn is the great evil that sexualises kids earlier and makes them easier to groom.
They drive up sentiment where people naturally get angry about a threat to their children, as it could be yours next. Then the government comes in with these online "safety" bills so that your children will be safe and people lap it up. Every time. Most Anons here might be too young to remember them pushing the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, which I mentioned before allows for them to track Internet activity in real time, legally and without higher authorisation. That was also to keep "children safe" and people in this country lapped it up because the thinking was that only nonces would disagree.
Now we're going to have a lot of jeets raping kids and people will want more intrusive Internet and data monitoring so that they can be watched in real time, regardless of where they are and what they're doing. Just wait a few years for another "children's safety act" which will allow anyone, anywhere to have their phones logged and accessed for monitoring
