>>511328537
the effects of the declaration of the french revolution translated into anglo/germanic comprehension will forever haunt us as the most disastrous thing to have ever happened for those comprehensions naturally consider all men and women to be inherently the same in all aspects.
And yes simps are currently the majority of men, and the only way to manage some kind of reform that is not outright violent is to ensure women are disgusted with the simp takes and go into supporting some meme take on the non simp male position.
this however will not happen until the finances for simps and women go broke. util the taxman cannot squeeze anymore and the governmental paymaster is forced to say: no more money, i do not see much changing.
Sparta could not get out of spinster women owning all property, demoralizing men and eventually not able to export military officers to their allies, Rome did not manage to reign in female whoredom and generate native legions,
the Caliphate of Bagdad did not manage to get women in control and out of mens jobs until its successor reformed after the fall to the mongols....
Uncle Adolf did some stuff on that front but for some reason i am hesitant to say it would have succeeded since it did not last more than one generation to see its results. And even so, part of his success can be linked to extreme levels of poverty and degeneracy.
tl;dr until there are no more money and hunger pains start to make a reappearance in a significant double-digit percentage of the population, the population will insist upon keeping the status-quo.
Even now, the Argentinians had to have some almost 43 %or 34% extreme poverty to consider not being socialists like it is usual for Latinos.
So imho, until we have those numbers in absolute shit, without coups, radical change won't have the necessary support. Hell, even with coups, you need a somewhat similar hard core of popular support to keep your new shiny seat.
