psyop: shame so called "incels" as "failures to launch"
logick: you do not have children or x financial status, therefore you are a loser

this is an argument i see on 4chan CONSTANTLY. the only people who make this type of logick, or those who have not actually thought deeply about this subject. today, we put to rest this fallacious reasoning, and as anons adopt this thought process, you will notice these posters will simply disappear, since they will no longer have emotional purchase on anons peace.

a "loser" in a rigged contest, didn't lose to lack of skill. a "winner" under artificial selection (money-based system where housing/shelter is a function of purchasing power which is a function of economic status which is a function of you position within an already existing hierarchy (generational wealth old money elites - rothschilds for example), or your obeisance to that legacy system. therefore, if you succeed under this system, you either had an advantage which was leveraged by the incentive structure, or you simply followed orders for those who belong to the former category.

second point of contention: failure to breed equals genetic impotence or weakness. genetics are expressed in the context of artificial selection, like mice in a controlled experiment. you might be able to deduce information about the mice at a genetic level, but the genetic expression is subdued in the context of the experiment's paramaters. this is also true for human's in modernity, in both directions. failure to breed is not a sign of lack of genetic fitness. success in breeding is not a sign of genetic fitness. just look around to confirm. when you factor in mating strategies relative to time horizons (r vs k selection), the breeding strategies further distort this idea of "more kids equals more success."

You personally should not reproduce, schizophrenia is hereditary. Instead skip ahead and kill yourself.

>>511324610 (OP)
Incel shit is not politics

>>511324610 (OP)
all psyops to shame incels have failed.
nobody gives a shit what vaxxed roasties and their vaxxed NPC asslickers think.

>>511324710
Jews have the highest rate of schizophrenia among any ethnic group.

>>511324610 (OP)
>you will notice these posters will simply disappear
They won't, they're being paid to post here. At most you'll get them to switch to something else

additional component: cultural interpretations
the cultural milieu we find ourselves drowning in asserts that breeding is not zero sum, therefore "incels" have their calculus wrong and therefore are angry for no reason.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9036153/

this is a complete misunderstanding of race and genetics, because certain genetic profiles will simply be wiped out, as they are not able to reproduce with mates similar to them. therefore mating is zero sum once a mate is taken out of the pool, she is not available for another mate (more or less, there is a bit of nuance here like two tier mating strategy - cucking, or alpha fucks beta bucks).

thus, "incels" are perfectly reasonable to be concerned about their opportunities to reproduce their genetics in a way which preserves their racial expression, in other words, having children that look like them, when they observe these trends, as mating is by definition zero sum.

therefore, the impetus to shame "incels" for their "failure to launch" fails on multiple fronts as a valid arguments or thought formation. instead, it betrays itself as a shame based browbeating tactic to shame the primary target of modernity (white men), for daring to tell the truth of what's happening at a level of artificial selection, or the elites intervening in natural human breeding processes, in even more ways than already living in an artificial society causes these patterns to become distorted in their expressions.

tl;dr you cannot be a "failure" for not having kids or making x money since the economy is rigged

being concerned about the racial future is not only rooted in genetics (perfectly natural), but societies' counter to this (breeding is not zero sum) is an invalid rebuttal since breeding is by definition zero sum.

>>511324710
can you point to a logickal flaw in my argument

>>511324724
reproduction of yourself is the most political subject possible
since it is expressed in the context of artificial society
and others placing constraints on you (politics)

>>511324842
good, as they should since they are logickally incoherent
emotional appeals. i am just giving anons more ammo
showing them the emperor behind the curtain is naked

>>511324610 (OP)
you lost, faggot. you feel it every day, that you're an exile, a loser, it looks back at you from every corner. your parents are ashamed of you, your peers laugh at you, the woman you used to like gets an ick from you.
you're oppressed by kikes, niggers, chinks, women, trannies, glowies, faggots, jannies, commies, jeets, CEOs, masons, space lizards, vaxxies. why? because you're stuck being a child, forever. there's only one way out for you, and you know it.

>>511324949
i guess it's easier to be a coward who doesn't leave the house, rather than taking your ass into a bar and talking with girls face to face, that requires effort

>>511325659
>lost
a rigged contest is not only not a legitimate contest
the results are not indicative of participants' skill or fitness

>>511325767
i have a gf. doesn't mean i don't have sympathy
for "incels"
or understanding mechanically the arguments
and their implications

>>511325767
Yea literally never went out, it's gay.

Will cold approach at walmart tho. Bardudes ain't even know what balls of steel is.

>>511325790
but your loss and your misery are real and that's all that matters lol

>>511325767
And what if i am not interested in basic, severely used up whore?

>>511326043
do you have an argument?

>>511324610 (OP)
That's a roundabout way of saying you're an incel, OP.

>>511326230
haha, bet you think breeding isn't zero sum.
why not just redefine reality so that the shaming
of "incels" is dressed in cultural authority
these are supposedly the best and brightest
coming up with a slam dunk scientific argument
against "incels" and it fails in its basic formation.
how much money was lost in this research on
a faulty premise? how much were these retards paid?

>>511326172
argument against what? the childish "it wasn't fair" drivel? lol do you really need me to lay out for you how infantile that is?
you're not making any discussible claims, just crying and coping, so I'm just laughing back at you.

>>511326738

The only relevant question is:
Do you decide for yourself what is valuable to you, or do you let 'society' decide that for you?

it's weaponized conformity they use because incels pose a threat to them. watch the little worms squirm once you stop being cattle easily swayed by social conditioning

>>511326881
to an extent i agree, but what about collective responsibility
isn't it childish and selfish for me to only consider
my own profit? shouldn't i be concerned of the
price all my ancestors' paid and the potential
future benefit of anyone who may benefit from my actions?
isn't "subjectivity" the very reason we are all trapped
in a myopic self serving ahrimanic hell hole?

>>511324610 (OP)
We are all loosers in the end

>>511326916
>:)

>>511327238
if everyone loses, nobody loses
therefore nobody can be a loser
except in someone's diseased "mind"

>>511327215
>collective responsibility
I do not accept it, simple as that.
Ancestors or descendants do not get to decide shit for me.

>>511328189
fair enough, i guess i just feel it's wasteful
to not be a good steward with the gift they gave me
though i can see how ultimately, the individual
chooses their own path

>>511324610 (OP)
shame worked on you because you cared what a bunch of pedophiles thought about you, cuck

>>511328575
but it didn't and my post is giving anons ammunition
to decode these tacticks
if it had worked i would have impregnated a goblin or landwhale
to avoid childishness

>>511328699
childlessness sorry

>>511324610 (OP)
You care way to much holyfuck just live your life you faggot