>>511339228It's worse than that.
>In dividing official from unofficial conduct, courts may not inquireinto the President’s motives. Such a “highly intrusive” inquiry would
risk exposing even the most obvious instances of official conduct to ju-
dicial examination on the mere allegation of improper purpose. Fitz-
gerald, 457 U. S., at 756. Nor may courts deem an action unofficial
merely because it allegedly violates a generally applicable law.
The ruling creates a legal paradox that is intended to prevent the courts from discerning what is official or unofficial. Congrats, presidents are immune to the law.
But that aside, Trump isn't going to do anything about the other imaginary crimes he's accusing whoever of.