>Our gynocentric society (feminist dictatorship) has forced millions of healthy men out of the dating market
>Forced millions of them into a life of lonely inceldom
>Yet the tradcons are working with feminists to ban all pornography and sexual video games
>This rapidly growing incel population has porn and sexual videos games as their only source of sexual satisfaction
>It won't turn these men into determined studs that go out and get wives
>Most women will still have unreasonable expectations for partners and be too brainwashed to settle down
It won't improve gender relations. I also believe it's going to increase the amount of shitskins raping women in the West.
>Inb4 only kikes defend porn
If you're not willing to make average Western women settle down with average Western guys, then don't bitch about lonely dudes wanking.

Obviously we need to tax single men harder so they go out and get into relationships.

>>511336471
>Obviously we need to tax single men harder so they go out and get into relationships.
They'll try something like that until they realise most of us don't have jobs.

>>511336471
>>511336735
I see a crime wave coming

>cause problem
>people cope with a remedy to problem
>outlaw remedy to problem
>problem remains

>>511336471
If they tac me enough, will my hairline grow back??

>>511338374
No, all the proceeds from the tax will be invested into new abortion methods.

Based.

>>511339088
Tradcons are worse than libshits these days.

>>511336302 (OP)
I'd rather do literally anything than deal with fucking women

>>511336302 (OP)
>life of lonely inceldom
Meanwhile, in the lives of women

>>511336302 (OP)
>The hussies are trying to ban the love between a brother and sister
"Andy, get the body bag"

>>511336302 (OP)
It's funny because leftists have long held the position that porn is good for you and that anti-porn people are all MGTOW misogynist incels. They advertise to the world on a daily basis that they have zero integrity or values of any kind other than what gets them clicks.

>>511336471
>so they go out and get into relationships.
Women do not improve men's lives.
Nor do they want to.

>>511341037
Who said anything about improving men's lives?

>>511336302 (OP)
>feminist dictatorship
This kind of rhetoric just alienates people. If women are so politically incompetent then how are you being ruled by them? Either you are wrong about women's competence or you are even less competent than they are. Either way you are taking a big L.

A much better rhetorical approach is to deny that women are actually in control and that feminism is just a tool that one group of alpha males use to oppress other men and solidify their power.

Women are allowed to think they are running the show to satiate their ego, but they are basically just middle managers in a society where ruling class = 1% of men, middle class = women and lower/working class = 99% of men.

This gets you out of the lose-lose situation above, and can easily be applied to analyze real world phenomena. For example feminists importing fighting age muslim men doesn't lead to a female ruling class, it just replaces one male ruling class with a different one.


One big reason the establishment want women in "positions of power" (which are actually middle management roles in the bigger picture) is that women are more susceptable to media influence. If media controls women and women control all the government, corporate etc positions then media has just gained control of the government and all corporations. These top media executives are still men, and thus feminism isn't creating a female dominated society, it's creating a harem society where women are allowed to rule over 99% of men in order to advance the interests of the ruling 1% of men.

>>511341231
>This kind of rhetoric just alienates people. If women are so politically incompetent then how are you being ruled by them?

We are not directly ruled by them but an ideological system which priortises them at the expense of men and boys (particularly White males). It's also a system that excessively caters to every foid's impulsive whim and wants, because the system knows their unchecked behaviour leads to the destruction of White men and the civilisations they have built.

>>511339695
You have to be fucking retrarded beyond belief 15yo to even say that as a joke.

>>511340954
>porn is good for you
Porn is the only media that shows women making and effort to please men.
Prove me wrong.

>>511340260
That pic needs more cats.

>>511336302 (OP)
Tradcucks are worse the feminists. If I had but one bullet and was faced with a tradcuck and feminist, I would let the tradcuck have it.

>>511342231
>please men
retarded nigger short-term gratification coomer brain mindset.

Girls acting like promiscuous sluts, women becoming whores, rampant adultery, destruction of traditional societal structures and norms is so, so pleasing to Men.

>>511341231
Elites want men subservient to women because it generates more money. Women are retards who spend money on worthless garbage. Same with shitskins but by fucking with relationship dynamics they got men giving women tons more money, voluntarily or not
>british flag

>>511341231
>For example feminists importing fighting age muslim men doesn't lead to a female ruling class, it just replaces one male ruling class with a different one.

More reproductive aged men competing for them = more money for them = more money for jews

All 3D women are whores. Take the 2D + AI pill.

>>511336302 (OP)
Typical white vermin blaming everyone else for the fact that they can’t even go outside, let alone actually talk to someone.

>>511336302 (OP)
Those games were a less-bad outlet than the meatspace alternatives.

There was one study that showed a downward spike of property crime when GTAV was released. That's the phenomenon at play here.

>>511342754
Wypierdalaj stąd matole.

>>511343673
Oh look, retarded polish simp is here. How does her cum-filled pussy taste like, faggot? Polish women are whores who have ~50 bodycount in their teens, not to mention that they're the only race who openly fucks pajeets.

>>511342857
You pakis have arranged/forced marriages because you're that repulsive. You cannot criticise anyone for struggling with women. The islamic world has a bigger incel population, because most of the wealthier muzzrats hoard all of the women (polygamy).
>>511342044
Tradcons will actually enact laws which punish men for being single but will never punish women for being hyper gamous spinsters.
>>511343275
True.
Isn't it better for a guy to jerk it to cartoon girls and waste his energy instead of abusing actual little girl?

>>511341668
>>511342680
>>511342745
Absolutely, but I think it's important to always emphasize that the people on top under feminism are still men, otherwise you end up falling in to the
>how can jews be inferior if they rule the world lmao?
trap, just for women rather than jews. Of course some feminists will say
>well if the people on top under feminism are men then that just means we need even more feminism!
but don't be afraid of this. These kinds of feminists are going to say we need more feminism regardless of what rhetoric you adopt, so don't let anticipation of their response influence your strategy. In the eyes of most sane people, feminism causing evil men to rise to the top is proof that feminism is retarded and self-defeating, not proof that we need more feminism. It's similar to how communist revolutions leading to dictatorships where the entire country is the private property of a single individual is seen by communists as proof that we weren't communist enough (because an evil capitalist hijacked the revolution), but it's seen by most sane people as proof that communist theory is flawed and self-defeating.

Now that I think of it, is there a buzzword for this phenomenon? I mean stuff like this:
>feminism creates conditions that allow bad men to rise to the top
>bad men rising to the top means we need more feminism
>repeat with feedback
or this:
>communist party creates conditions that allow a dictator to monopolize everything
>everything being the private property of one man means we need an even stronger communist party
>repeat with feedback
where an ideology being self-defeating is seen as proof that we need more of it, and getting more of it just enables to defeat itself even harder, leading to a feedback loop + death spiral. It seems very common in dysfunctional ideological cultures and it would be nice to have a catchy descriptive name instead of having to give a wall-of-text explanation every time we encounter an example of it.

>>511343887
>not to mention that they're the only race who openly fucks pajeets.
I know women in my community (the Scottish) who willingly reproduced with chinks. I don't mean wealthy ones, I mean like low skilled workers such as factory workers and dishwashers. I mean imagine fucking bug peasants. Granted Polish women are worse but even French women are worse than them. Katsuni has a French mother and so did Asia carrera lol.

>>511341231
Women are the majority of consumers and run the economy. If you are dating or married, she has final say or purchases without you. If she is single she just splurges. Not only that but men in power rather have subservient femnoids to boss around and do their work then teaching a young buck that may steal their thunder.
>https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/womens-impact-on-the-economy