>$8000 AI baby = good
>$8000 AI wife = bad

>>511340327 (OP)
Where can I buy one?

>>511340327 (OP)
What is even the point of caring about what happens to Westroons at this point? Imagine falling for muh """AI""" to this insane degree.

>>511340327 (OP)
The difference is the doll is a substitute for mens failure to launch. It is a trickle down effect resulting from men having AI wives, porn, etc. You can't see that because you cooked your brain from grooming too much.

>>511340843
>failure to launch
Yeah that sounds like something to say about a woman who regresses to playing with dolls instead of having a family.

>>511340843
>implying women dont goon

>>511340843
>it's always mens fault
Der Ewige Tradcuck

>>511340843
>failure to launch?

>>511341336
I'm convinced that this is probably true and women never have orgasms they are just gooning all the time. The closest thing is maybe when they get pregnant and have their memes.

>>511340474
Most 'intelligence' as its measure today is rote memorization and how quickly you can regurgitate information. IQ, PISA, SAT, ACT, all of these tests are standardized around this purpose alone. So if the modern conception of intelligence revolves around how well you regurgitate information, then AI can sufficiently replace humans as how it did in chess, go, and backgammon. Language is a game like any other, read Wittgenstein.

Does it make women lactate?

>>511340474
If you are a terrorist u can hold the baby hostage for more time.

>>511342851
>retard doesn't know how an IQ test works
>AI can sufficiently replace humans
Pic related: Grok 4 "reasoning AI" trying to solve a simple problem.

>>511340474
Now I know you're a glowie. Probably still a woman anyways.

>>511340327 (OP)
That's not AI baby though, that's a chunk of inanimate plastic, reborn babies have been a trend for more than a decade, it's either that or cats for some bitches.

Besides, what's an AI baby gonna do, cry and shit all day for eternity?

>>511343084
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient

>Unlike Galton, who promoted eugenics through selective breeding for positive traits, Goddard went with the US eugenics movement to eliminate "undesirable" traits.[57] Goddard used the term "feeble-minded" to refer to people who did not perform well on the test. He argued that "feeble-mindedness" was caused by heredity, and thus feeble-minded people should be prevented from giving birth, either by institutional isolation or sterilization surgeries.[56]

>French psychologist Alfred Binet and psychiatrist Théodore Simon, had more success in 1905, when they published the Binet–Simon Intelligence test, which focused on verbal abilities.[37] It was intended to identify "mental retardation" in school children,[38]

I know exactly how it works, it's made to see if someone is retarded. The only capacity it's still used in today in the US military is to filter people out for service. If IQ was sufficient as a measure of higher intelligence they would have started using it for placement. You literally need to train AI, it's like if you took a random person and expect them to be able to do tasks without training. If standardized tests like IQ are the only metric of intelligence AI can surpass humans, the problem isn't 'intelligence' it's the fact that humans can do much more on much less data, AI requires data centers the size of an Amazon warehouse.

>>511343890
>IQ
>rote memorization
>regurgitate information
>I know exactly how it works
Kek.

>AI can surpass humans
Then how come non-retarded humans can see the problem here but not """AI"""? >>511343084

>>511344206
You can increase your IQ by taking tests over and over and over. It's a measure of how well you take tests. You don't regurgitate information when you play chess, but the game is structured in a way that it's solvable.

Right now I just asked GPT I asked CHATGPT what is the significance of this equation, 2x1.0079+15.999=, I didn't give the answer, and told me it can represent a molecule of water because these are the atomic masses. I also used the hyphen and period keys ..-- .- and it told me it was Morse Code. I asked is frame dragging in the gravity probe experiment a weak coupling of spacetime to mass it said yes. It was able to predict what the answer was even with limited context, kind of like how you do the exact same thing on an IQ test when they tell you 'how many triangles do you see' or 'to identify the missing objects'.

>>511340327 (OP)
>paying 8k to get woken up multiple times during the night
y tho

>>511340327 (OP)
Have fucking children, you stupid fucking cunt bags! Women are truly fucking retarded creatures.

>>511344863
>You can increase your IQ by taking tests over and over and over.
Marginally. So?

>Right now I just asked GPT I asked CHATGPT...
Stopped reading. Don't care. See >>511343084 for an example of """AI""" trying to solve a simple problem. It's not replacing anyone at anything.

>>511345254
Definitely not marginally. All tests are trainable and that's exactly how 'AI' works it takes neural networks and has them compete in a certain game until it gets better and better. The only problem with it is that it takes an immense amount of data while humans take very little.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7709590/

>When standard deviations of the initial test and 2nd retest were pooled in the calculation of the effect sizes, the experimental group’s performance was 10 IQ points higher on average than that of the control group. Further, with the properly defined measures of fluid and crystallized intelligence, the experimental group showed a 15 IQ points higher increase than the control group.

This is exactly how AI works it keeps running the same tests and improves its dataset. You now have AI speedrunning games, not TAS, actual AI. It works exactly the same for IQ, your one example of taking a completely untrained module that's basically a glorified search engine and expecting it to be perfect is the same thing as taking a random person and expecting them to be a competent engineer. Did they not make you read Timaeus in school? Remember when Plato takes the slave boy and makes him do geometry, the boy screws up and Plato trains him how to double a square by just asking questions? Even though he screws up constantly he eventually gets the answer if the subject is pressed enough.

>>511346233
>an IQ increase of seven points ... at the end of the three-years’ training

>This is exactly how AI works
Holy shit, you're actually, clinically retarded. 70 IQ max.

>>511340327 (OP)
Yes, the John is always in the wrong

>>511346574
Yes AI only gets marginally better as it plateaus, like any single other test. Standardized tests, without exception have a ceiling, the people who started this test were already educated it takes longer to get better at the tests consistently just like it takes longer to go from reducing running a mile in 6 minutes to 5 than it does reducing a 15 minute mile to 10. Chinese peasants had an average IQ of like 85 the ones in the cities are measured in the 100s. Even in Europe and the US 80 years ago nearly everyone would be clinically retarded by modern standards because the agricultural sector was still massive and compulsory education wasn't so absolute, it's called the Flynn Effect.

>>511347439
Not even reading your schizobabble. Go do whatever magical training you think can get you from 70 IQ all the way up to 85 IQ. Then learn how an IQ test actually works. Then learn how """AI""" actually works. And then maybe I can talk to you in simple terms I would use to talk to an average nigger and have you grasp a thing or two.

>>511340430
You can visit a gypsy caravan and pick up a real one for less than $8k

>>511342500
That means that your rocket doesn't get up, because it sucks.

>>511347698
Holy shit do you not see the issue? 'AI' only works with tests that are already established, you CAN'T go from 70 to 80 IQ because the entire point of the test is selecting out retards. You CAN go from 85-100+ because the test doesn't mean anything past that point it's already served its function. Otherwise you'd be hard pressed to explain how Europe and Asia went from being near clinically retarded to 95+. How the fuck do people worship this metric and not even know how it works? It was created to sterilize retards almost all of IQ's genetic coefficient is scaled toward the low end of testing because that's what it was designed for: eugenics.

>>511348435
What I see is that you don't understand how an IQ test works and that you get your opinions from whatever leftist tabloid covers trash by (((Lazar Stankov))).

>>511340327 (OP)
OP here I shouldve said robot baby and robot wife not AI

>>511348971
There's memory tests, solving patterns, verbal tests. They usually separate it by crystallized and fluid both are less than 50% heritable with the vast majority of inheritance coming from the lower end, which isn't surprising because almost word for word this is what the test was created to look for. When you ask AI to reason that would fit the fluid category, fluid intelligence is linked to things like strategy games (chess) and learning skillsets. I don't know how you interpret this any other way, yes there's people with severe mental disabilities that physically can't do abstraction at all (like most niggers), but there's also lazy people who don't want to perform. The purpose of the test is to see if you can abstract at all, it doesn't measure anything more than this. Even leftist rags will say that when someone is clinically retarded you can't help them much like how you don't expect someone with muscular dystrophy to run a marathon.

>>511350057
>both are less than 50% heritable
Didn't read the rest. Completely delusional.

>>511341336
only the femcels do

>>511340474
>doesn't know how machine learning operates
no surprise given that flag, you're probably the only one with access to internet

>>511352892
You're seething and yet you can't explain how that picture is wrong.