Thread 511342095

Imagine you're on a sugarcane plantation in the Caribbean. You need a machete to cut sugarcane.

You're gonna hand 100 ppl that you're supposedly keeping under oppression machetes?

Being a plantation owner had to be very dangerous.

>>511342095 (OP)
I would make them cut those sugarcane stalks down by biting them, no machetes

>>511342095 (OP)
yeah and even you would have guns those would be top loading so you kill one and then 99 niggers make you kebabs

they don't need even those knives to be dangerous

>>511342095 (OP)
And yet we too let the government do whatever the fuck they want to us, because at the end of the day, we're no better than those field and house niggers, we are cowards and collaborators all.

>>511342095 (OP)
African people are the most docile if you treat them harshly

>>511342095 (OP)
Hello burger, everything you've learned about slavery comes from Uncle Tom and worse. How about you pick up a book from the period and read about the actual institution as it actually existed instead of the abstract moral evil it now is?

>>511342095 (OP)
>>511343611
also they already were slaves. Europeans never enslaved africans. Europeans BOUGHT slaves from africans. They were already enslaved.

>>511343626
Ok explain how plantation owners prevented noggers from just rushing them with the machetes they needed to harvest the cane?

>>511342095 (OP)
It never happened. Plain and simple. Whats much more likely is a bunch of kikes told those niggers they could live the good life and then boated them over en masse to start working the fields etc. No chains, no whips, no missing appendages, just the exact same system we have now with NGOs and their corporate leaders. Probably the same families doing it now that we're doing it back then.

>>511343510
THIS. kek retard humanoids are no different than chained slaves except worse because they think they are free, but they know they arn't. So it's this silent fake freedom that people know they don't have that they walk around with.

>>511342095 (OP)
It's almost like the director of that show was lying about stuff.

>>511344034
They didnt have to. They were treated well. Imagine 400 years and not one group of them mounts an meaningful rebellion even once. Meanwhile theyre descendants shoot at everyone every day. It simply does not make sense at all. It simply did not happen.

>>511342095 (OP)
Well anon, what do you think they used to revolt?

>>511344084
They would prefer to go to America because the Americans didn't chop their balls off like the Muslims would.

>>511344034
they had guards with guns? what kind of retard question is this

>>511344034
You don't understand, the slaves just didn't. It turns out it's exceptionally possible to suppress an enormous amount of people with only a handful of armed men. This has been true all throughout history, even in your yeehaw patriotic country. Revolutions are not just rare, they happen when the revolutionaries are supported by very powerful allies. Otherwise they are almost trivial to put down with barely any violence at all, given sufficient will. So the explanation is a combination of how the slaves were relatively content with their lot (compared to violent struggle) and the futility of that same struggle preventing it from even happening. Or TLDR: life wasn't hell on earth, and you dont mob rush a bunch of guards except in hollywood

>>511342095 (OP)
Caribbean sugar plantation slavery was brutal. Most sugar plantation slaves were worked to death within a year or so. Most were underfed and any sign whatsoever of rebellion was met with overwhelming brutality. North American cotton plantation slaves had it relatively easy by comparison. Note that Jamaica alone used up almost a million and a half African slaves while the total number of slaves imported to North America was less than half a million.

>>511344336
Semiautomatic guns didn't exist in the 1700's. You might be able to get off a few shots in a minute, and that's with nerves of steel.

>>511344537
yeah you get a few shots off and the rest just scatter because they dont want to get killed

>>511342095 (OP)
>live happy, worry-free worry life with all your brothas
>even have your own plantation family
>house negroes had it even easier
Why would you throw all that away just to kill whitey and then get caught and hanged for it?

>>511342095 (OP)
Slaves did rebel.
Wagies usually don't rebel.

>>511345027
yeah slavery was outlawed and replaced by wagies because wagies are much easier and cheaper to use instead

>>511342095 (OP)
I think slavery of blacks in America, never happened.
After the covid-19 pandemic we all saw them lie to us and gaslight history, in the present, in real time.
It is even easier to do this with stories from 400 years ago.
Black Americans, (as a group though not every single individual ) are surly, lazy, loud, obnoxious, belligerent and dumb.
They are bad at working.
And think about this. Would you trust blacks yo prepare and cook your families meals? Or to be nannies and raise your children?
None of the story we are told about American slavery adds up.
I call bullshit.

>>511343901
Also it was the Jews that were operating the Transatlantic slave trade

>>511342095 (OP)
Word to Tippu...

>>511342095 (OP)
Most slaves were mentally broken (learned helplessness, as shrinks would all it), and in the few cases where they were not, there were slave rebellions and dead slave owners. Those were quickly defeated every time, though, which elad to surviving slaves being even less willing to rise up.
If you read contemporary reports (summed up in kurt saxons "root rot", for example - that old nazi certainly didn't favor blacks in his selection of sources), there's plenty of stories of african slaves being tortured so badly by other africans that they just blindly did whatever they were told to do, up to the point of letting themselves be killed with no resistance.
Add to that that (most) white slave owners, while not exactly friendly, did not kill or cripple slaves for no reason (don't want to damage your tools, after all), and plantations might well have seemed like paradise to first-generation slaves.

Where it gets more interesting is rubber plantations, where indios were enslaved. Those people didn't have a culture of slavery, yet still, the vast majority of them was controlled by only a handful of whites within a few years. Mostly by divide and conquer, allying with one tribe for a while, then subduing them after their former enemies were already brought under control.

>>511342095 (OP)
read a history book, unironically

>>511344537
one officer could carry multiple pistols which he could fire in quick succession. if he timed it right, he could then use his musket to shoot another man before wielding it like a polearm and getting sick counterattack combos

>>511342095 (OP)
Well, imagine having an IQ in the low 70.

You z actually can't really imagine that if you're not clinically retarded.

>>511345879
>Those people didn't have a culture of slavery

In the absence of centralized currency how can you not have a culture of slavery?

>>511346163
You function on an anymal level.
This seems to be the reality for quite a lot of people.

The Spanish and Portuguese were worse than the British but American slaves had a better quality of life than factory workers in the north.

>>511344034
>Ok explain how plantation owners prevented noggers from just rushing them with the machetes they needed to harvest the cane?
The same way completely outnumbered prison guards maintain control of niggers in prisons, you find the head nigger in charge and give him things the other niggers don't get, then in an effort to keep his status the alpha nigger keeps the other niggers in line. The power structure was not two tiers consisting of owner and slaves, there were tiers amongst the slaves with limited room at the top for those willing to benefit off their ability to control the lesser niggers. When this system fails, you get your revolts, be it in plantations of old or prisons today.

>>511346765
Everybody else running slaves made America look like the minor leagues. The muslims were the worst by far. They had no fields to work. They castrated the males and forced them into mamluke divisions in their military to serve as meat waves. The women were to be wives, sex slaves, concubines and maids. They did this for over 1,300 years.

>>511344414
>Most sugar plantation slaves were worked to death within a year
Holy kek
NIGGER

>>511344383
This.
I would also add that if you look at where it did happen - Haiti. It wasn't the slaves that rebelled, it was the large mulatto population, educated and brought up in the white mans world. The slaves where "recruited" into the rebellion, they weren't the instigators.
If you are operating at the bottom of maslows pyramide, you might fight for your life (in the face of an imminent threat) or a meal, but not abstract ideas of freedom.

>>511345901
>unironically

Read a dictionary. Start with the U section.

>>511347088
>The muslims were the worst by far.
This is true. It's honestly hilarious that "salam aleykum/aleykum salam" became a thing for blacktivists. White men fought to put a stop to the arab slave trade by the way.

>>511347246
>>511344383
They talk about this in the book 1984 by George Orwell. It's mentioned that revolutions are always started by the upper middle class, which wants to become upper class, and leverages the lower class to achieve these goals.

If you look at medieval societies, kings usually bend over backwards to appeal to the peasants, and try to pirtray themselves as protecting the peasants from the nobility. This is because the nobility is always at odds with royalty and want to usurp their position. As good as nobles have it, they still want to feel more special.

You see the same kind of envy among university students. Who goes to universities? The children of the rich and upper middle class. And those same students blather on about inequality and worker's rights, as though they've ever done an honest day's work in their life. In reality, they are trying to achieve two goals: Avoid the wrath if the proletariat, and direct said wrath at their class enemies (either the upper class or the potential usurper).

You would think the lower class benefits from such an arrangement, but in reality, these policies only end up hurting everyone because they're all divisive and braindead handouts, if not outright purges.

>>511343611
Afro-anon is right. I hate to say it, but the real problem with American niggers isn't that they live in fear of cops or klansmen, it's that they DON'T live in fear. The reason why every African government runs the way it runs is because it has to.

Blacks who sold other blacks even warned white buyers to keep them well-whipped. Arabs had the good sense to castrate their slaves.

>>511344034
>>511344034

Smart blacks got promotions. House slaves and overseers, the smartest and most morally upstanding of blacks, were treated well and put in command of the field niggers. So anyone who did try rebelling would have the smarter and braver element of their own people fighting against them.

This is why terror is inherent to slavery. If you're not constantly terrorizing and buck breaking your slaves, you are a DEAD slave owner.
The "benevolent slave owner" narrative is a meme.
The institution of slavery is just simply a bad deal, they vastly outnumber you, are mad as hell and have nothing to lose, that is too much for cheap labor. The Greeks knew that, the Romans knew that, and the Southerners were about to learn that too. Had it not been for the war, the South would have experienced a massive chimp out that they would not be able to contain. It would've been Haiti 2.0.

>>511344084
Haiti?
There were slaves revolts across the South too but it's hard to communicate and form a movement beyond one plantation when theyre all illiterate.

>>511342095 (OP)
They never tell you about what happens to a slave that's no longer young and strong enough to works the fields either. Because they don't want you to know they basically set them free around the age of 50 or so. And then continued to feed, cloth, house, and provide medical care for them (like they did for all their other slaves) for the rest of their natural lives.
Don't be mistaken, slavery was bad. But it was infinitely better to be one in the colonies/early America than to be one in the Caribbean/South America, or any of the Arab states.

>>511347294
amazing reply btw

>>511347294
Underrated

>>511348320
>This is why terror is inherent to slavery. If you're not constantly terrorizing and buck breaking your slaves


If it was so bad? How did their population explode? If you're getting pussy your life can't be that bad.

>>511342095 (OP)
Another ignored fun fact there were millions of Africans vs a few thousands of colonists who were very vulnerable due of the logistics and distance, Africans had all the advantages beside the technological one which without logistics is useless yet still lost and got enslaved with millions and not even when they were next to weaponry that could've capture they failed to do that

70 well equipped/trained/paid men can keep hundreds of men in submission in the right circumstances. When you can effectively control the borders and keep your workers in a constant state of exhaustion, you can create a prison with no walls. Add control of food, medicine, and a healthy bit of reward for snitches, and your inmates will police themselves.

>>511349584
Lol
>Why did people breed their livestock, are they dumb?

Servility.

>>511350947
Damn so you're saying incels have it worse than slaves even?

>>511348190
>the real problem with American niggers isn't that they live in fear of cops or klansmen, it's that they DON'T live in fear
I always thought that to be the case. And that racial motivated white-on-black violence and Klan violent incidents pale in comparison to what blacks do on a regular basis.
This exaggeration of "muh triple K" and white cops shooting blacks by the mainstream media, and the fact that the media also does everything it can to hide the black-on-white crime reality, shows that blacks are not as oppressed as one is led to believe, and that it is the average white fella who fears for his life whenever he is walking the streets.

>>511349584
>>511351262
>How did their population explode?
I was just answering that bit. Makes sense to expand operations whenever you can.
>incels have it worse than slaves
To my thinking, if you gave an incel the opportunity to be a Haitian sugarcane slave, but they get to breed the other slaves, they'd take that deal.

there were over 250 slave revolts and over 100 rebellions or uprisings in the USA since 1619 but America just hides this information and doesnt talk about it much. You ever had even 1 chapter of your American history textbook dedicated to slave uprisings?